“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label forced exams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forced exams. Show all posts

How to Disappear a Family (Without Ever Losing Their Number)

 🧾 SWANK Dispatch: I Didn't Relocate — You Just Lied

🗓️ 24 October 2020

Filed Under: false relocation claim, sexual abuse cover-up, social worker evasion, psychological evaluation, truancy distortion, homeschool retaliation, DSD negligence, environmental trauma, institutional gaslighting

“They touched my children without consent.
Then claimed they couldn’t find us.
While calling me on the same number I’ve had since 2016.”
— A Mother Who’s Been ‘Relocated’ Without Ever Moving House

This 6-page memorandum to Mark Fulford of F Chambers is a bombshell of misconduct, denial, and bureaucratic revisionism.

In it, Polly Chromatic traces the systematic erasure and distortion of traumatic incidents, including:

• Sexual abuse of her children during an unconsented medical examination
• Fabricated claims of relocation to excuse DSD’s abandonment of the case
• Contradictory timelines from official reports and emails
• A full rebuttal of false educational neglect claims
• Evidence of DSD’s continued harassment despite full compliance

🧠 I. The “Relocation” Myth

Despite being present, reachable, and compliant, DSD repeatedly claimed:

  • “The family had relocated”

  • “They were unable to complete assessment”

  • “They could not locate the mother”

Meanwhile:

  • She was living at the same Palm Grove address

  • She had the same phone number since 2016

  • She was home ill during 2018 — not missing

  • DSD had previously visited her there — on record

“If they couldn’t find me, why didn’t they call me?”
“They did. Many times.”

👩‍⚖️ II. What She Documents

  • Medical assault of her sons with no consent and no privacy

  • Clear motive to cover up this by claiming an incomplete investigation

  • Constant homeschool obstruction, despite written approvals

  • Threats to inspect children’s notebooks — even though all learning is digital

  • Mould-related illness from uninhabitable conditions in Providenciales

  • Interference in home renovations used to justify safeguarding action

  • Fabricated safeguarding concerns based on sightings during "school hours"

  • One-sided “psychological evaluations” that were never returned

⚠️ III. Why This Letter Exists

Because institutional memory loss is not a clerical issue — it is a weapon.
And this letter ensures that:

  • Every lie is dated

  • Every contradiction is documented

  • Every abuse is followed by a name and a timestamp


No comments:

She Refused to Close the Curtain. We Filed the Light.


⟡ Nine Adults, Three Sons, and One Curtainless Examination ⟡

Filed: 8 November 2020
Reference: SWANK/TCI/2020-CTMC-FORCED-EXAMS
📎 Download PDF — 2020-11-08_SWANK_TCI_CockburnCTMC_MedicalMalpractice_ForcedChildExams_ABenjamin.pdf

I. They Called It Examination. We Called It Violation.

This complaint was filed after Dr. A. Benjamin of Cockburn Town Medical Centre allegedly performed:

  • Forced physical exams on multiple children

  • Without curtains

  • Without parental consent

  • With multiple unrelated adults present

  • While the mother, a disabled foreign national, was ignored and intimidated

What began as a welfare check devolved into institutionalised medical trespass.

The children were not ill.
The doctor was not accountable.
And the parent — was documented.

II. A Timeline of Medical Horror in Plain Clothes

This record documents:

  • The absence of written consent

  • The presence of nine adults and a single minor patient

  • The removal of clothing without procedural justification

  • A doctor who refused to stop

  • A hospital administrator who later claimed the incident "did not happen"

The complaint was submitted to the Ministry of Health.
It was never answered.

So SWANK answered for them.

III. The Secondary Violations

Beyond the trauma of the exams themselves:

  • Medical records were withheld for months

  • No safeguarding report was ever produced

  • The hospital refused to confirm how many staff were in the room

  • The experience caused lasting distress — for both the children and the mother

This was not a misstep.
It was a state-enabled bodily breach.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not believe trauma must be televised to be real.
We do not require institutional permission to define violation.
We do not consider Caribbean neglect culturally exempt from accountability.

Let the record show:

  • The complaint was written

  • The names were preserved

  • The trauma was real

  • The file — is permanent

This is not defamation.
This is documented procedural violation with a SWANK header.




No comments:

Documented Obsessions