Racial Identity Isn’t Optional. Ignoring It Is a Violation.

---

⟡ “We’re Not White. We’re Not Ignoring That Anymore.” ⟡

A mother issues a formal multi-agency submission detailing racial erasure, linguistic suppression, and cultural exclusion within a PLO process meant to assess “family needs.”

Filed: 19 April 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-09
📎 Download PDF – 2025-04-19_SWANK_Email_PLO_RacialDiscrimination_LanguageAccess_SocialWorkEngland.pdf
A formal email to Westminster and RBKC officials, copied to NHS, the Metropolitan Police, and Social Work England, documenting concerns around racism, misrepresentation of the children’s father, and systemic refusal to accommodate cultural or language needs.

---

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic issued this email to over twelve institutional contacts after repeated efforts to schedule a PLO meeting devolved into racial mischaracterisation and disregard for the father’s linguistic and cultural identity.

The email included:

• Concern over how her children’s non-white background was erased

• Objection to forced English-only communication despite known barriers

• Complaint about the refusal to provide cultural or linguistic accommodations

• A formal cc to Social Work England and the Metropolitan Police

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• Institutional refusal to acknowledge ethnic and linguistic needs

• Systemic misrepresentation of the father’s role and origin

• Hostile, mono-cultural framing of a cross-cultural household

• Patterned sidelining of both parent and paternal identity

• Multi-agency record of escalation, sent to medical and legal oversight bodies

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because saying “he’s not white, he’s not English, and you’re ignoring that” is not inappropriate — it’s the only honest thing left to say.
Because when a mother documents the erasure of her children’s identity, and no one replies —
that silence becomes part of the record.

---

IV. Violations

• Equality Act 2010: racial discrimination and cultural exclusion

• Human Rights Act: interference with private and family life

• Language Access breach: failure to offer translation or accommodate

• Ethical misconduct under Social Work England’s framework

• Institutional gaslighting of lived ethnic identity

---

V. SWANK’s Position

Polly Chromatic was never asking for special treatment.
She was asking that her children’s origins not be deleted for bureaucratic convenience.
This letter proves the request was made —
and the silence was deliberate.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

The Quiet Collapse of Duty: NHS Watches While the Parent Schedules the Rescue.

---

⟡ “Three Children. One Mother. No System.” ⟡

The hospital never called. So the mother emailed — again — to offer all available times.

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-06
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_Email_Reid_DisabledChildrenRespiratoryConcern_VisitCoordination.pdf
An exhausted but composed email to Dr Philip Reid reveals ongoing respiratory concerns in three of the author’s disabled U.S. citizen children, and institutional reliance on her willingness to self-schedule crisis care.

---

I. What Happened

On 21 November 2024, Polly Chromatic emailed Dr. Reid requesting an appointment for three of her children: Heir, Kingdom, and Prerogative — all showing signs of respiratory distress.

• Heir had been in critical condition earlier

• Kingdom was deteriorating

• Prerogative, though improving, remained unwell

The tone was calm. The message was clear:

“I can come in whenever you want.”

The email ended with a reminder that she would take them to A&E if needed — a threat disguised as grace.
She copied Kirsty Hornal and Laura Savage for accountability.

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• Escalating respiratory symptoms in three vulnerable children

• Lack of proactive scheduling by the consultant

• Reliance on the mother’s flexibility and silence

• Documentation of worsening conditions and clinical concern

• Continued disregard for parental disability and family burden

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because one mother shouldn’t be scheduling her own child’s emergency care.
Because she shouldn’t have to follow up — again — when her children can’t breathe.
Because this isn’t parenting — it’s triage.

---

IV. Violations

• Duty of care breach by NHS (Reid) through delay and non-response

• Passive safeguarding neglect by WCC (Hornal)

• Breach of disability recognition protocols (verbal exemption ignored)

• Systemic failure to implement proactive health interventions

• Undue burden on a disabled caregiver to manage three vulnerable patients alone

---

V. SWANK’s Position

There is no drama in this email.
Only danger.

It documents three children at risk —
and a mother offering to make herself available
at any time
on any day
to a system that refuses to call her back.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Kingdom Couldn’t Breathe. The Hospital Couldn’t Be Bothered.

---

⟡ “He Couldn’t Speak. They Still Said No.” ⟡

The NHS emergency room refused to assess a breathless disabled child — again.

Filed: 22 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/ER-REFUSAL-02
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-22_SWANK_Email_Reid_KingdomDeniedCare_ERNeglect_DisabilityHarm.pdf
Time-stamped documentation of Westminster and RBKC’s knowledge of ER refusal, as a disabled U.S. citizen child (Kingdom) is denied urgent medical assessment for respiratory distress and speech loss.

---

I. What Happened

On 22 November 2024, Polly Chromatic brought her son Kingdom to the emergency room. He could barely talk, was visibly unwell, and had been pre-cleared by Dr Reid for observation.
They refused to see him.
No triage. No medication. No evaluation.

This was the second time — Heir had also previously been refused.
The pattern was unmistakable. The email documented everything.
It was sent to:

• Dr Philip Reid (NHS)

• Kirsty Hornal

• Sarah Newman

• Fiona Dias-Saxena

• Gideon Mpalanyi

And bcc’d to protected evidentiary contacts.

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• ER refusal to assess a disabled child with severe symptoms

• A repeat pattern of medical rejection after earlier complaints

• Escalation of risk (Kingdom could not speak, was visibly deteriorating)

• Documented need for steroid and antibiotic consideration

• Immediate notification of Westminster and RBKC officials

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because refusing to see a child who can’t speak is not a triage decision — it’s premeditated neglect.
Because no parent should ever have to write,

“They are hateful and leave us unable to breathe for months.”
Because institutional cruelty thrives in silence — until it’s posted.

---

IV. Violations

• Clinical negligence by ER

• Passive collusion by Westminster safeguarding

• Section 20 Equality Act violation (parent’s verbal disability ignored)

• Breach of duty under Children Act 1989 (refusal to examine sick child)

• Patterned retaliation for previously filed complaints

---

V. SWANK’s Position

This was not a misunderstanding.
It was a message.

Kingdom was unwell.
Heir had been denied before.
Polly Chromatic is disabled herself.
And still — no duty of care, no response, no accountability.

So now this too is public.
For Kingdom.
For Heir.
For court.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

He Was Gasping. They Were Ghosting.

---

⟡ He Couldn’t Breathe. They Didn’t Care. ⟡
When a disabled child named Kingdom is turned away from emergency care, and every professional stays silent.

Filed: 22 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-22_SWANK_Email_Reid_EmergencyCareRefusal_KingdomBreathingCrisis.pdf
An urgent email documenting a child’s medical crisis, refusal of care by A&E staff, and the calculated indifference of every safeguarding and NHS professional copied — including Philip Reid, Sarah Newman, Kirsty Hornal, and Gideon Mpalanyi.

---

I. What Happened

Kingdom couldn’t breathe.
The A&E staff refused to treat him — just as they had previously refused his sister.
There was a visible pattern: disability + documentation = denial.
The mother, herself medically vulnerable, sent the warning shot.
She explained the hatred. The refusal. The ongoing risk.
She cc’d everyone.
Not one responded with urgency.
Not one intervened.

---

II. What the Email Establishes

• That a disabled child was refused emergency medical care

• That the refusal followed a pattern affecting other siblings

• That Westminster and NHS officials were formally alerted in writing

• That no safeguarding escalation occurred despite known risk

• That this is not neglect — it is coordinated omission

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because when a child says “I can’t breathe,”
and an institution says “we don’t believe you,”
someone else needs to start writing things down.
Because medical racism and disability erasure don’t always scream —
sometimes they just ignore.

---

IV. Violations Identified

• Refusal of Emergency Medical Treatment

• Disability Discrimination Against U.S. Citizen Children

• Racial and Familial Targeting Within NHS Settings

• Non-Response from Safeguarding Authorities Despite Crisis

• Procedural Normalisation of Medical Neglect

---

V. SWANK’s Position

This was not a mistake. It was a method.
They’ve ignored every diagnosis. Every exemption. Every report.
And when Kingdom couldn’t breathe —
they didn’t panic.
They proceeded.
Now so do we.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Communication Is a Choice—So Make It, or Step Aside.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 15 December 2024
“Replying to Emails: I Don’t Rush, and You Can Choose to Listen or Not”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Verbal Disability · Communication Protocol · Email Access Rights · Selective Reading · Legal Misunderstanding · SWANK Clarity Dispatch

---

✉️ My Communication Philosophy

“I don’t like being rushed and I don’t rush anyone.”
“If they ignore me, I just move on with my life due to incompatibility.”

Communication is not a demand—it is a choice. I respect yours. Kindly return the favour.

---

🧠 Refusal to Read Is a Form of Misconduct

“Human motto: ‘I misunderstand and I refuse to listen so I continue to misunderstand.’”

This is not miscommunication. It’s strategic ignorance.

---

🤝 How Communication Works in My Life

“My boyfriend reads my emails and then we talk—verbally, but only after reading.”
“This is how everyone respectful in my life handles it.”

Read first. Speak after. That’s the adjustment. That’s the law.

---

⚠️ A Request for Legal Respect

“It makes no sense for me to email my lawyers about my case only for it to be ignored or treated like it’s ‘for fun.’”
“I think it’s weird.”

So do I. And so would any tribunal.

---

📍 Communicated Clearly by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Messages Measured.

---

The Curriculum Was Fine—Until Social Workers Became the Subject.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 30 January 2025
CHILDHOOD INTERRUPTED: A TEN-YEAR LESSON IN HOW TO UNLEARN TRUST

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Homeschool Disruption · Social Work No-Shows · Authority Distrust · Routine Sabotage · Disability Communication Refusal · SWANK Educational Corrosion Index

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Philip Reid, Laura Savage, Gideon Mpalanyi

---

📘 THIS ISN’T A CASE. THIS IS A CLASSROOM.

“It’s been very disruptive to homeschooling to have social workers disrupting our day for ten years for no reason…”

This is not child protection.
This is pedagogical vandalism.
You have not observed—you have interfered.
Ten years of unsanctioned intrusion is not diligence. It is dysfunction, draped in lanyards.

---

⏱ MISSED APPOINTMENTS. MISSED CHILDHOOD.

“…and all the no shows are irritating to us all.”

You no-show.
You reschedule.
You forget.
And yet you call it professionalism.

A child learns something from every encounter.
Yours have taught mine that time doesn’t matter, and promises are ornamental.

---

📎 STILL NOT VERBAL. STILL NOT YOUR PROBLEM?

“Please Note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

This is not an aesthetic preference.
It is a medical mandate.
Failure to comply is not inconvenience—it’s discrimination.

You cannot assess when you refuse to listen.
You cannot safeguard when your presence endangers the lesson plan.

---

Polly Chromatic
Too literate for your interruption. Too elegant for your theatre.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Lessons Interrupted, All Absences Logged.

---

Ten Years of Educational Sabotage Masquerading as Child Protection.

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 30 January 2025
YOUR VISITS TEACH NOTHING EXCEPT HOW TO RESENT AUTHORITY.

📍 Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
🗂 Filed Under: Homeschool Disruption · No-Show Social Workers · Bureaucratic Interference · Learning Environment Sabotage · SWANK Education Interruption Register

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Philip Reid, Laura Savage, Gideon Mpalanyi

---

📚 THIS IS NOT SCHOOL SUPPORT. THIS IS SYSTEMIC OBSTRUCTION.

“It’s been very disruptive to homeschooling to have social workers disrupting our day for ten years for no reason…”

You have contributed nothing to our curriculum but delay, doubt, and distrust.
Where there should be algebra, there is agenda.
Where there should be books, there is bureaucratic blather.
Your presence is neither requested nor required—nor, apparently, ever properly scheduled.

---

🕰 NO-SHOWS AS A FORM OF DOMINATION

“…and all the no shows are irritating to us all.”

No-shows are not neutral.
They are passive-aggressive power plays masquerading as oversight.
You schedule. You vanish.
And we are left explaining your absence to children more punctual than the state.

---

📎 VERBAL REFUSAL REITERATED (FOR THE RECORD YOU NEVER READ)

“Please Note: I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”

Still valid. Still ignored.
Still filed under: Institutional Ableism.
Failure to honour a basic medical adjustment is not a slip-up. It is a statutory breach.

---

Polly Chromatic
Headmistress of the Unbothered. Historian of Harassment.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Absences Accounted For.

---

Prednisone Was Prescribed, But Disdain Was Delivered.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
SHE WAS COLLAPSING. YOU GAVE HER ANTIBIOTICS—AND NOTHING ELSE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Paediatric Medical Neglect · Prednisone Panic · NHS Collapse Rituals · Chest X-Ray Denial · Telepathic Clarifications · SWANK Respiratory Abuse Archive

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson

---

🧒🏽 HEIR’S TREATMENT TIMELINE—IF ONE DARES CALL IT THAT:

“The hospital didn’t do a chest x-ray.”
“Put Honor on a second antibiotic.”
“Said to give prednisone.”
“Told me to follow up with the GP.”

Diagnosis? None.
Compassion? Missing.
Prescriptions? Abundant.

A checklist masquerading as care.
She was in collapse, and they were performing protocol theatre.

---

🫁 THE AFTERMATH WAS PHYSICAL—FOR BOTH OF US:

“Now I can’t breathe after that experience—and I was breathing well before.”
“We just got home.”

Medicine should not require recovery from the visit itself.
But with the NHS, harm is not a side effect. It’s the main event.

---

🩺 THE EXCEPTION THAT PROVED THE INSTITUTIONAL RULE:

“I would have rather just had Dr Reid do it all…”
“I don’t blame him for their ignorance.”
“Thank you, Dr Reid.”

There are still doctors who understand dignity.
They just don’t seem to be staffing A&E.

---

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (IGNORED, AS ALWAYS):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

They ignored the scan.
They ignored the breath.
They ignored the patient.
But the archive will not ignore them.

---

Polly Chromatic
Breath held. Truth released.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Omissions Filed.

---

You Let My Daughter Collapse So You Could Blame Me for Breathing Wrong.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
THEY WOULDN’T EVEN DO A CHEST X-RAY. THEN THEY GAVE HER TWO ANTIBIOTICS.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Paediatric Asthma Mismanagement · Medical Gaslighting · Hospital Abuse · Prednisone Protocol · GP Deflection · NHS Incoherence · Telepathic Access Denial

---

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson

---

🧒🏽 HONOR’S MEDICAL TIMELINE (ABUSE-ADJACENT):

“The hospital didn’t do a chest x-ray.”
“They did finally treat Honor in a short stay room after the doctor abused me.”
“They put her on a second antibiotic.”
“Told me to give her prednisone and albuterol every four hours.”
“Told me to follow up with a GP.”

What they lacked in investigation,
they made up for in prescriptions.

---

🩺 THE MOTHER HAD DATA. THE SYSTEM HAD DISDAIN.

You dismissed the evidence.
You bypassed the scan.
You outsourced diagnosis to a GP you hadn’t even consulted.
And then had the audacity to insult my access needs.

---

💨 SHE WAS BREATHING BEFORE. COLLAPSING AFTER.

“We just got home.”
“Now I can’t breathe—and I was breathing well before.”
“I’m so disgusted with the hospitals.”

This isn’t post-care fatigue.
It’s systemic injury disguised as treatment.

---

🫶🏽 ONE PROFESSIONAL, ONE NOTE OF GRACE:

“I would have rather just had Dr Reid do all of it.”
“Thank you so much, Dr Reid.”

The rest acted like my daughter’s chest was a theory.
He treated it like a reality.

---

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (REPEATED AD NAUSEAM):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Still ignored. Still lawful. Still binding.
If you can’t accommodate, you can’t assess.

---

Polly Chromatic
Mother, analyst, witness—reporting live from the breathless state of care.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breaths Counted.

---

Three Problems, One Condition, No Compassion.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE JUST WANT TO BREATHE—NOT BE BLAMED FOR EXISTING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Disbelief · Respiratory Torture · Social Rejection · Asthma Isolation · Telepathic Clarity · NHS Hostility · School Gaslighting · Chronic Misunderstanding · SWANK Testimonial Evidence File

---

📍 To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Harley Street Mental Health, Nannette Nicholson

---

❌ THREE RECURRING INSTITUTIONAL FAILURES:

1. Defensive hospital staff who treat symptoms as accusations.

2. Protocol defiance and diagnostic laziness, dressed in lanyards.

3. Gaslighting as standard—“We don’t believe you” as a care plan.

Dr Arjumand repeated—several times—“I don’t believe you,”
while I was visibly, audibly, physiologically struggling to breathe.
My children watched. No one intervened. Again.

---

🫁 THE LONGEST SYMPTOM: DISBELIEF

“My whole life, I’ve had to explain my inability to breathe—and still not be believed.”
“From classrooms to clinics, I’ve been called dramatic, then blamed for being right.”
“Now my children are punished for their lungs, and I’m vilified for defending them.”

There is no gas stronger than medical contempt.
And no inhaler for institutional ego.

---

👁 HUMANITY REQUIRES MIRRORING—NOT SURVEILLANCE

“Blind people have blind friends. Deaf people have deaf friends.
Even racial communities seek mutual comfort.”
“We want friends who breathe like us. Who understand what it means to survive the air.”
“I breastfed all four of my children to prevent this illness. They got it anyway.
And they are still the only ones who understand me.”

This isn’t martyrdom. It’s physiology.
And you’re not listening. You’re watching with a clipboard.

---

💡 OUR REQUESTS (WRITTEN, AS ALWAYS):

• Respect the written access adjustment.

• Treat us without interrogation.

• Stop requiring verbal performance to access care.

• Believe the data, not your mood.

• Stop punishing asthmatic existence.

---

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT: STILL VALID. STILL IGNORED.

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

This is not ambiguity.
This is refusal to perform your preferred pantomime of health.

---

Polly Chromatic
Mother of four. Truth-teller by breath. Refuser of bureaucratic delusion.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disbelief Cross-Examined.

---

The United Kingdom of Respiratory Resentment.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE MOVED HERE TO SOCIALISE. YOU MADE US SICK.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Asthma Stigma · Social Exclusion · Disability Discrimination · Verbal Adjustment Ignored · Hostility by Health Status · Snobby Expat Observations · SWANK Sovereignty Log

---

💬 FROM THE RECORD (AND STILL NOT READ):

“We felt isolated in Turks and Caicos and came here because we love the people and socialising…”
“…however people here don’t like that we have asthma.”
“It’s like you are all angry at us for having asthma. Period. That’s how we feel.”
(But we feel better now that you are all helping.)

How British.
The nation that prides itself on queues, etiquette, and empathy—
couldn’t stomach a child with a nebuliser.

---

🇬🇧 A VERY BRITISH IRONY:

We left the tropics for community.
Instead, we found shame with side-eye.
Here, you’re punished not for speaking too loudly—
but for breathing too audibly.

Asthma became our accent.
And you made it foreign.

---

🧠 ACCESS STATEMENT (REPEATED IN EVERY EMAIL, IGNORED IN EVERY ROOM):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

But in Westminster’s elite social script:

– Inhalers are uncouth
– Telepathy is impolite
– Email is invisible
– And asthma is a personal offence

We asked for community.
You offered performance notes.

---

Polly Chromatic
Moved for connection. Received bureaucracy. Documenting every exhale.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Stigmas Archived. All Illnesses Public.

---

If You Refuse to Treat Us, At Least Do It Quietly.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I CAN’T ARGUE. I’M BREATHING. PICK ONE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Endangerment · A&E Hostility · Medical Gaslighting · Child Treatment Refusal · Verbal Disability · NHS Bullying · SWANK Pre-Litigation Catalogue

To: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Doyenne of Telepathic Correspondence

---

💬 THE LINES THEY STILL PRETEND NOT TO HEAR:

“No one will tell me what the ‘erratic’ behaviour was, given that I’ve only said I want treatment and can’t argue due to respiratory strain.”
“When a woman in the waiting area was abusing me, they blamed me.”
“All the hospitals share the same hatred and ignorance of asthma.”
“They refuse to treat my kids more than they refuse to treat me.”
“I’m going to sue them. It’s child neglect.”

---

🧠 VERBAL AUSTERITY STATEMENT:

I do not argue.
I breathe.

If you want to help—help.
If you don’t—move.
I will not waste oxygen proving my suffering to those who monetise disbelief.

---

🧬 ACCESS STATEMENT (STAMPED, SENT, IGNORED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Every refusal is now a receipt.
Every conversation denied is a case number pending.

---

📎 PRE-SUIT REMINDER:

You refused access.
You denied medical care.
You blamed me for needing it.

And now you’re logged.
Publicly. Permanently. Procedurally.

Polly Chromatic
Gaslit, blamed, untreated—and now suing.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com

---

Search Description:
A&E refused to treat asthmatic mother and children, then blamed them for needing care. Polly Chromatic files pre-litigation documentation.

Labels:
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Philip Reid, NHS asthma refusal, St Thomas’, St Mary’s, Chelsea & Westminster, A&E abuse, verbal disability, child neglect, SWANK legal threat file

You Don’t Have to Believe Me. You Just Have to Treat Me.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I’M NOT AVOIDING THERAPY. YOU’RE AVOIDING ACCESS.
Also titled: “When Silence Is the Only Accommodation You Won’t Offer.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Therapy Denial · Access Sabotage · Disability Discrimination · Community Exclusion · Verbal Adjustment Refusal · SWANK Procedural Harm Index

To: Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara

---

🩺 THE STATEMENT THEY RECEIVED—AND STILL REFUSED TO UNDERSTAND:

“I’d love to go to therapy but no one will provide adjustments for my disability needs...”
“It is not our problem. It is your community’s problem.”
“You keep expecting us to behave like people who don’t have a disability—and we can’t.”
“Someone needs to call the mental health practice and explain that I can’t explain everything verbally.”

You didn’t misunderstand.
You simply didn’t care to translate accommodation into action.

---

🧠 FOR THOSE ALLERGIC TO DIGNITY, HERE’S A TRANSLATION:

I asked for therapy.
You offered a trapdoor lined with expectations.

I required written communication.
You insisted on performance.

I named the exclusion.
You punished the diagnosis.

This is not “non-engagement.”
It’s exclusion, dressed up in procedural couture.

---

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (IGNORED, AS EVER):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Your refusal is now formal.
Your evasion is now archived.

---

Polly Chromatic
Denied services. Denying your excuses.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com

---

When Silence Is the Only Accommodation You Won’t Offer.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I’M NOT AVOIDING THERAPY. YOU’RE AVOIDING ACCESS.
Also Titled: “When Silence Is the Only Accommodation You Won’t Offer.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic, Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Filed Under: Therapy Denial · Institutional Inaccessibility · Verbal Disability · Community Exclusion · Communication Barriers · Mental Health Discrimination · SWANK Correctional Filing

To: Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Curator of Access Denied

---

💬 THE MESSAGE YOU RECEIVED—AND STILL FAILED TO DECODE:

“I’d love to go to therapy but no one will provide adjustments for my disability needs, and this limits my ability as well as my kids’ ability to integrate into the community at all.”
“It is not our problem. It is your community’s problem.”
“You keep expecting us to behave like people who don’t have a disability—and we can’t.”
“I think someone needs to call the mental health practice and help them understand that I can’t explain everything verbally, since they couldn’t understand when I told them, apparently.”

---

🧠 TRANSLATED FOR THE VERBALLY DEPENDENT, ACCESS-ILLITERATE PROFESSIONALS:

I requested therapy with adjustments.
You offered verbal performance instead.
I disclosed my communication needs.
You pathologised my precision.
I named exclusion.
You escalated it.

---

🗣 ACCESS STATEMENT—STILL UNREAD, STILL UNMET:

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You offer assessments with no access.
You offer support with no structure.
And then you call us “noncompliant.”

---

📎 CLOSING NOTE FOR FUTURE TRIBUNALS:

This isn’t therapy avoidance.
It’s documentation of access denial masquerading as care.
Your system resents the quiet.
Mine will publish it.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

Polite Enough to Be Ignored: When Calm Requests Precede Procedural Retaliation

---

⟡ “It’s Like They’re Angry I Brought My Children to the ER” ⟡
A Polite Appointment Request That Also Serves as a Micro-Complaint Against NHS Hostility

Filed: 22 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS/EMAIL-04
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-22_SWANK_Email_Reid_KingAppointmentRequest_DisabilityDisclosure_NHSDismissal.pdf
Email to GP Dr. Philip Reid requesting an appointment for one child and noting NHS hostility toward emergency care requests. Quiet, careful, and legally relevant.

---

I. What Happened

On 22 November 2024, Polly Chromatic sent a measured request to Dr. Philip Reid regarding her son, King. She expressed flexibility with scheduling and confirmed she would continue to monitor his condition at home until seen.

But embedded in this simple note is a quiet alarm bell:

“It’s like the hospital staff are angry at me for even bringing my kids to the ER.”

The message, copied to social worker Kirsty Hornal and Bcc’d to a legal contact, also restated a disability-related boundary: written-only communication due to verbal impairment.

This is not a crisis email. It’s a record of calm concern delivered to an indifferent system.

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• Medical responsibility was proactively exercised by the parent

• The request was reasonable, timely, and deferential

• NHS staff had already displayed animosity for accessing care

• Disability disclosure was restated for the record

• The sender’s composure stands in contrast to any later claims of escalation or non-engagement

---

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is what parents are told to do: ask nicely, accommodate the system, and remain flexible.

And it still didn’t work.

SWANK logs this as a baseline evidentiary marker — one that neutralises future accusations of hostility or avoidance. It also forms part of the longer chain of written-only declarations that were ignored or dismissed.

This is the politeness that came before the rage.
And it was ignored, too.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

This wasn’t aggression.
It was responsible concern — treated like an inconvenience.

We do not accept that reasonable medical requests should be punished with suspicion.
We do not accept that written-only disability notices must be repeated endlessly to matter.
We will document every moment calmness was used against the vulnerable — and every record that was too soft to be taken seriously.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.