⟡ “The Court Moved the Date — But Not the Evidence” ⟡
Crown Court Confirms Rescheduling of March Hearing and Acknowledges All Prior Correspondence Has Been Submitted to the Judge for Review
Filed: 11 March 2025
Reference: SWANK/COURT/EMAIL-04
📎 Download PDF – 2025-03-11_SWANK_Email_CrownCourt_HearingReschedule_JudgeNotesCorrespondence.pdf
Summary: Inner London Crown Court confirms the 7 March hearing has been vacated and reset for 4 April 2025. All correspondence from Polly Chromatic has been received and will be considered.
I. What Happened
On 11 March 2025 at 10:57 AM, Polly Chromatic sent an email reply to the Inner London Crown Court confirming receipt of a new hearing date. This followed an earlier message from the court which:
– Vacated the hearing previously set for 7 March
– Reset the matter for hearing on 4 April 2025
– Affirmed that the judge has reviewed all past communications and submissions
– Directed further replies to the court’s official mailbox
The chain also confirms that Polly forwarded additional materials and marked the original service attempt to Mark Rowley (Met Police).
II. What the Record Establishes
• Your appearance requirement was officially altered
• The court now has formal possession of your communications and evidence
• This prevents future denial of submission visibility
• Your document trail remains uninterrupted and timestamped
• It shows responsible engagement on your part, including direct police notice
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because judicial memory starts with documentation.
Because every delay, vacated date, or judge’s note needs to be tracked — with precision.
Because this email proves the court saw you — and your archive.
SWANK logs procedural compliance — and confirmation of judicial review.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that hearings vanish without documentation.
We do not accept that evidence can be unseen once acknowledged.
We do not accept that judicial notice is informal when the archive exists.
This wasn’t a date change. It was judicial receipt.
And SWANK will document every courtroom door that opened — or tried to close.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.