“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Disability Disengagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disability Disengagement. Show all posts

You Were Not Ignored. You Were Archived.


⟡ “I’m Not Explaining This Again. I Already Filed It.” ⟡
An elegant jurisdictional withdrawal from all written and verbal contact with Westminster Children’s Services, RBKC, the NHS, and legal counsel. In this message, Polly Chromatic formally exits institutional dialogue and activates a public record archive. Medical disclosures, legal boundaries, and documentation strategy are outlined — not to be understood, but to be observed. This is not a sign-off. This is evidence.

Filed: 5 December 2024
Reference: SWANK/MULTI/EXIT-00
📎 Download PDF – 2024-12-05_SWANK_Email_Disengagement_MultiAgency_JurisdictionalShift_PublicArchiveNotice.pdf
A multi-agency disengagement notice sent to safeguarding leads, clinicians, legal counsel, and advocacy services. Verbal and written communication is formally withdrawn. Public record jurisdiction is activated through SWANK and Instagram (@pol.lychromatic). Institutional silence is pre-acknowledged. Consent to correspondence is revoked. This is the boundary before litigation.

I. What Happened

Polly Chromatic wrote:

  • “I never want to have to explain anything again, verbally or written.”

  • “I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.”

  • “I prefer to communicate telepathically… however email is fine.”

  • “Documenting everything on Instagram @pol.lychromatic.”

  • “Thank you for putting up with my emails.”

The recipients included:

  • Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena (Westminster)

  • Gideon Mpalanyi (RBKC)

  • Dr Philip Reid (NHS)

  • Simon O'Meara, Laura Savage (legal)

  • Harley Street Mental Health

The tone was kind. The boundary was clinical. The shift was total.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That disability-based withdrawal was made with medical clarity

  • That public record jurisdiction replaced private correspondence

  • That every agency was notified of the transition

  • That this is not disengagement — it’s realignment

  • That this message serves as a timestamped proof of closure

This email doesn’t ask to be respected.
It just proves you were warned.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because documentation is safer than conversation. Because repeated medical disclosure to non-listening institutions is trauma replication. And because when you say: “This is my last message,” and they keep talking — that’s not safeguarding. That’s breach.

SWANK archived this because:

  • It is the primary disengagement notification across all agencies

  • It proves you gave them every opportunity to comply

  • It replaces the inbox with the record — and makes silence your legal witness

  • It starts the evidence timeline for post-withdrawal contact violations

IV. Violations (If Contact Occurs After This)

  • Equality Act 2010 –
    • Section 20: Adjustment refusal = unlawful communication pressure
    • Section 27: Disability retaliation via continued contact

  • GDPR / DPA 2018 –
    • No lawful basis to engage post-withdrawal without updated consent

  • Human Rights Act 1998 –
    • Article 8: Psychological and family interference through unwanted contact

  • SWE / NHS Professional Codes –
    • Violation of explicit boundary = misconduct

V. SWANK’s Position

You don’t get to act like she disappeared. You were copied in. You don’t get to escalate after she opted out — that’s not care, it’s coercion. And you definitely don’t get to pretend this email never happened. It’s filed. It’s timestamped. It’s public. And from this point forward, everything else is just... evidence.

SWANK London Ltd. classifies this document as the foundational disengagement archive notice, and the jurisdictional handover point from private contact to public documentation.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments: