“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label CTMC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CTMC. Show all posts

The Records Went Missing. The Harm Did Not.


⟡ SWANK Clinical Misconduct Archive – TCI ⟡
“They Called It Concern. Then They Examined My Children Without Consent.”
Filed: 8 November 2020
Reference: SWANK/TCI/CTMC-INTERHEALTH-MEDICAL-ABUSE-01
📎 Download PDF – 2020-11-08_SWANK_TCI_CTMC_InterHealth_MedicalMisconduct_Complaint.pdf
Author: Polly Chromatic

I. This Was Not a Clinical Encounter. It Was Institutional Harm With a Stethoscope.

Filed in November 2020, this complaint names Cockburn Town Medical Centre (CTMC) and InterHealth Canada in a coordinated act of medical misconduct against a disabled parent and her children.

At the centre of it:

  • Non-consensual genital examinations

  • Eight to nine adults present

  • No safeguarding threshold met

  • No paediatric emergency declared

  • No written consent obtained

  • And no clinical justification offered — other than vague “concern”

What happened in that room was not a misunderstanding.
It was institutional access disguised as assessment.

II. What the Complaint Documents

  • Children examined without prior disclosure, without legal basis, and without medical context

  • No paediatric specialist involved — despite the nature of the procedures

  • Multiple staff present, observing, without necessity or explanation

  • No documentation provided after the exam

  • A complete refusal to release medical records following the event

  • A consistent pattern of data concealment and narrative shaping, coordinated across state and hospital actors

This wasn’t safeguarding.
This was procedural theatre conducted on minors.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because medical consent is not optional when the state is involved.
Because child protection is not performed in silence and shame.
Because when a parent asks for records and is told “they don’t exist”,
— we file the refusal as evidence of its own misconduct.

We filed this because:

  • Institutions used “concern” as access and record suppression as strategy

  • The medical harm was not incidental — it was documented, denied, and repeated

  • This event was a blueprint for future abuse — and SWANK archives blueprints

Let the record show:

There was no emergency.
There was no consent.
There was no explanation.
And now — there is no silence.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept “checking” children as a state-sponsored entitlement.
We do not accept eight professionals in a room pretending consent was implied.
We do not accept silence where trauma was caused.

Let the record show:

The state was watching.
The clinic was participating.
The mother was alert.
And SWANK — wrote it all down.

This wasn’t medicine.
It was colonial safeguarding with latex gloves.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions