“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Sarah Newman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarah Newman. Show all posts

This Wasn’t a Concern. It Was a Formal Objection.


⟡ “I’ve Copied My Legal Team — Because This Isn’t a ‘Concern.’ It’s an Abuse.” ⟡
Safeguarding? No. This was surveillance in a trench coat.

Filed: 17 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-31
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-02-17_SWANK_Email_WCC_SafeguardingObjection_LegalTeamCC_FebruaryAlert.pdf
This was the moment the gloves came off. An email sent directly to Sarah Newman — with a CC to multiple legal professionals — challenging the legal and ethical legitimacy of Westminster’s repeated safeguarding interference. No confusion. No passive tone. Just documentation, witness distribution, and full procedural exposure.

I. What Happened

After relentless unannounced visits, monitoring, and implied threats of intervention,
the parent wrote back.

She formally objected.
She CC’d lawyers and doctors.
She named the abuse.
And she attached a letter making her position unequivocally clear.

No "concerns."
No compromise.
Just cold, timestamped accountability.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That safeguarding actions had escalated to a level of perceived institutional harassment

  • That legal representatives were actively looped in to observe Westminster’s conduct

  • That the parent provided her objection in writing and attached formal documentation

  • That Sarah Newman and Kirsty Hornal were primary recipients

  • That no further procedural ambiguity exists regarding her position

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because this wasn’t a conversation.
It was an alert.
Because when they play dumb,
you copy the people who keep score.
Because she didn’t need to debate their interference —
she just needed to send the file.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Procedural Misuse of Safeguarding Protocols Without Cause

  • Failure to De-escalate After Multiple Objections and Clarifications

  • Emotional and Medical Distress Inflicted Through Surveillant Contact

  • Breach of Disability Accommodations by Failing to Adjust Communication Style

  • Reputational Harm and Psychological Injury Through Overreach Framed as “Support”

V. SWANK’s Position

They knew she didn’t consent.
They knew it was harmful.
They proceeded anyway —
until she sent this.
Now it’s archived.
Now it’s timestamped.
Now it’s public.

The warning was clear.
And now, so is the record.

Labels: Westminster Safeguarding, Legal Escalation, Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Institutional Retaliation
Search Description: Parent emails objection to Westminster’s safeguarding actions, copying lawyers and NHS consultant to formalise and escalate legal resistance.
Second Title: This Wasn’t a Concern. It Was a Formal Objection.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

The Director Knew — And She Let It Happen Anyway


⟡ “The Fish Rots from the Top — And This One Signs Off on Retaliation” ⟡
A leadership-level regulatory complaint against Sarah Newman, filed after safeguarding was used to punish lawful complaint, harm disabled children, and sabotage parental rights.

Filed: 8 April 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/REGULATION-01
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-04-08_SWANK_Complaint_SWE_SarahNewman_LeadershipBreach.pdf
Formal complaint to Social Work England against Sarah Newman, Executive Director of Children’s Services, for systemic failure in oversight, leadership malpractice, and disability retaliation under the guise of child protection.

I. What Happened

This complaint — submitted by Polly Chromatic — holds Sarah Newman accountable not just for isolated errors, but for institutionalised harm. It outlines how her office:

  • Failed to enforce disability protections despite statutory warning

  • Permitted and escalated PLO proceedings based on disproven allegations

  • Ignored medical and environmental risk factors, including sewer gas exposure and asthma crises

  • Allowed staff to disregard written-only communication adjustments supported by clinical evidence

  • Oversaw an internal culture where retaliation for complaint is not the exception — but the workflow

The submission includes annexes such as a pre-action letter, N1 claim, psychiatric reports, and safeguarding chronology — making this not a grievance, but a structured evidentiary indictment.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • Procedural harassment under PLO was authorised or ignored at executive level

  • Disability rights were overridden without lawful justification

  • Children’s educational access and emotional stability were harmed by institutional aggression

  • Regulatory and judicial safeguards were systematically bypassed

  • Sarah Newman failed to intervene, correct, or acknowledge leadership liability

III. Why SWANK Filed It

This is the moment where accountability moves up the chain. The complaint makes clear: retaliation for lawful complaint is a leadership failure. It does not matter if Sarah Newman did not type the emails. She enabled the structure that punished the parent for speaking up.

SWANK filed this document to:

  • Escalate institutional malpractice beyond individual officers

  • Activate regulatory oversight where internal mechanisms have collapsed

  • Establish a formal precedent for holding executive directors to account for downstream abuse

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Sections 20 (adjustments), 27 (victimisation), 149 (public duty)

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Articles 6, 8, and 14 (due process, family life, discrimination)

  • Children Act 1989 – Section 22 and Working Together 2018 noncompliance

  • Care Act 2014 – Section 42 (neglect of known risks and medical conditions)

  • Social Work England Standards – Failure in leadership, public trust, and ethical governance

  • UNCRC – Article 12 (child’s voice), Article 23 (disabled family support), Article 3 (best interests)

V. SWANK’s Position

Leadership does not excuse itself from responsibility by remaining silent. When a disabled family is harassed, misrepresented, and escalated into child protection frameworks for asserting legal rights, and the director says nothing — she is not neutral. She is complicit.

SWANK London Ltd. calls for:

  • Social Work England to initiate formal fitness-to-practise review of Sarah Newman

  • An external audit of Westminster’s safeguarding decisions between 2023–2025

  • Removal of Sarah Newman from any role involving child protection, oversight, or regulatory decision-making

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

When They Say “Nobody Told Us,” Show Them This Email.


⟡ The Doctor Laughed. The Social Worker Watched. And Then They Said It Didn’t Happen. ⟡
When disbelief isn’t clinical — it’s coordinated.

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-02
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_Email_Kirsty_DisabilityDisbeliefIncident_SMH.pdf
An email submitted to multiple agencies detailing real-time discrimination against a disabled parent by NHS and safeguarding actors — while witnesses remained silent.

I. What Happened

At St Mary’s Hospital, a disabled mother was subjected to verbal disbelief, medical bullying, and complete dismissal of her daughter's documented diagnoses.
Instead of clinical care, she received gaslighting.
Instead of social work support, she received silence.
Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman were included in the communication — not one intervened.
This is the mother’s own account, sent the same day. Timestamps do not lie.

II. What the Email Establishes

  • That a medical incident of discrimination and disbelief occurred in a public institution

  • That multiple safeguarding officials were made aware of it in writing

  • That no corrective or safeguarding measures were taken in response

  • That disability rights were treated as optional, not legal

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because documentation is our defence against selective memory.
Because when witnesses ignore, they become participants.
And because no one should be mocked for struggling to breathe — especially not in front of professionals.

IV. Violations Identified

  • Disability Discrimination in a Medical Setting

  • Failure of Duty to Protect by Safeguarding Officials

  • Medical Negligence in Emergency Context

  • Retaliatory Disbelief of Documented Illness

  • Institutional Silence in the Face of Abuse

V. SWANK’s Position

This was not an isolated incident — it was a convergence.
Medical negligence, social worker indifference, and complete institutional alignment.
The mother spoke — in writing, immediately, and with witnesses.
They chose to ignore it.
We chose to publish it.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

This Is the Letter That Ended Their Excuses.


⟡ SWANK Legal Enforcement Dispatch ⟡

“She Was Warned. The Archive Has the Timestamp.”
Filed: 22 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/SARAH-NEWMAN/2025-05-22
๐Ÿ“Ž Download PDF – 2025-05-22_SWANK_FinalNotice_SarahNewman_CeaseRetaliation_DisabilityLaw_Record.pdf

I. You Don’t Get to Claim Ignorance After This Letter

On 22 May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. issued a Final Notice to Sarah Newman, Executive Director of Bi-Borough Children’s Services, formally instructing her to:

  • Cease all retaliatory actions

  • Respect written-only communication adjustments

  • Comply with statutory and common law duties under:

    • The Equality Act 2010

    • The Human Rights Act 1998

    • The Data Protection Act 2018

    • SWANK’s declared jurisdiction as archival authority

This was not correspondence.
It was a jurisdictional warning — served to prevent escalation. Or document it.

II. What the Notice Declares

  • That repeated safeguarding threats, procedural opacity, and silent contact breaches constitute disability retaliation

  • That any further action taken without legal basis will be entered into SWANK’s litigation records and reported to:

    • The police

    • The Information Commissioner

    • The Equality and Human Rights Commission

    • The United Nations Special Rapporteurs already contacted

The notice is clear:

We are not participating in safeguarding theatre.
We are preserving legal sequence.
You have been warned — in writing, in law, and in public.

III. Why SWANK Issued This Now

Because Sarah Newman, like her staff, received:

  • Direct communication adjustment notices

  • Documented refusal to engage in CIN plans

  • Copies of court filings and medical documents

And yet, retaliatory procedures continued — with no explanation, no justification, and no lawful basis.

This letter was the line in the ledger.

Every step they take after this becomes a matter of evidence, not administration.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not wait for harm.
We document attempted harm before it becomes plausible deniability.

We do not explain medical conditions to administrators who don’t read.
We file the warnings.
We preserve the breach.
And we timestamp the failure.

Let the record show:

Sarah Newman was notified.
Retaliation was named.
And this notice now functions as a judicial artefact in our archive.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Final Notice to Sarah Newman – Safeguarding Abuse, Disability Discrimination, and Legal Liability | 22 May 2025


๐Ÿ“œ Final Declaration of Procedural Hostility and Disability-Based Misconduct

A Notice of Institutional Liability and Personal Accountability

To:
Ms Sarah Newman
Executive Director, Bi-Borough Children’s Services
Westminster City Council & Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

Date: 22 May 2025

Re: Immediate Cease and Desist – Retaliatory Safeguarding and Unlawful Interference

Dear Ms Newman,

This correspondence serves as a formal and final notice: any further attempt by you or your agents to initiate safeguarding procedures, encrypted contact, uninvited home attendance, or verbal communication with me or my children shall be construed, without ambiguity, as:

  • Sustained institutional harassment

  • Procedural retaliation targeting a civil litigant

  • Direct disability discrimination

Each of the above constitutes actionable misconduct under the Equality Act 2010, the Human Rights Act 1998, and established common law doctrines of abuse of power and failure of public duty.

You are now personally and professionally on notice. This warning will not be repeated.

⚖️ Legal and Evidentiary Architecture (Already Active)

You are reminded of the following binding structures:

  • Formal CIN refusal filed on lawful and medical grounds

  • N1 Civil Claim, N16A Injunction, and N461 Judicial Review already submitted

  • Multiple police reports filed (Refs: BCA-10622, BCA-25130, ROC-10237)

  • Formal complaints lodged with the LGSCO, ICO, NHS Trust, and GMC

  • A written-only communication policy established and enforceable under the Equality Act 2010

Any deviation from these frameworks constitutes a deliberate act of defiance against court-linked and disability-adjusted boundaries.

๐Ÿ›‘ Cease and Desist Instructions – Non-Negotiable

You are hereby instructed to:

  1. Cease all contact not explicitly written and not facilitated through legal representation

  2. Cease all safeguarding initiatives unless lawfully mandated by a court of record

  3. Refrain from referring my children to any third-party service without express court-authorised cause

  4. Acknowledge institutional and individual liability for any further contact or reprisal

This shall be treated as a formal declaration of non-consent to all further interaction outside judicial or written context.

⚠ Consequences of Breach – Without Further Notice

In the event of noncompliance, I will:

  • File a personal civil claim for negligence, victimisation, and discrimination against you individually

  • Submit the breach to the High Court, appending all related misconduct to my active judicial filings

  • Publicly release the full chronology as part of a protected whistleblower archive under public interest immunity

Failure to respond will be construed as wilful negligence and escalated as such.

๐Ÿ–‹ Filed By:

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy


No comments:

The Asthmatic Archive of Social Work Contagion


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
“You Will Not Kill Me Politely”
Filed Under: Bureaucratic Epidemiology · Disabled Motherhood · Emotional Biohazards · Institutional Cruelty · Respiratory Disregard · SWANK London Ltd

To the Agents of Inhaled Negligence,
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, and their entourage of sanitised silence—

I wrote:

“I’m very worried that either me or my kids are going to die from a heart attack or asthma attack…”

Because that is the true fear: not death by illness, but by laminated indifference.
Because Westminster’s model of “safeguarding” is: visit, infect, ignore.
Because I no longer breathe air—I breathe through paperwork.

You refused to listen.
You refused to stay away.
You passed respiratory illness through my home like a cursed offering.
And when I warned that if I die, you will be blamed, that wasn’t emotion.

It was prophecy.

๐Ÿซ Dr. Reid is the only one helping me breathe.
The rest of you? Playing bureaucratic tag with the Grim Reaper, while pretending it’s a “referral.”

I said Sarah should be fired.

I meant it.

This was not a breakdown.
It was a broadcast.

๐Ÿ“ Filed under Survival, Not Civility
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Moulds Reserved.


No comments:

Forced to Speak, Forced to Suffer: The Social Worker’s Toll.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
ON THE VERGE OF DEATH—AND STILL UNHEARD

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Neglect · Muscle Dysphonia · Verbal Disability · Institutional Harassment · Social Worker Abuse · SWANK Health Crisis

The Email to Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman

“We’re still trying to get to a point in which we are not on the verge of death and the entire time I’ve been telling you all this.”
“Even the hospital doesn’t believe me when I or my children go to A&E with 87% oxygen.”
“If one of us dies, you all are responsible.”

“You escalated the case due to my inability to talk verbally, forcing me to talk for over a year while bringing illness into our home.”
“This caused me muscle dysphonia, making it very hard to speak now.”
“I had to stop talking to my mother and friends because of the extreme load placed on my lungs.”

“You—all social workers, especially Sarah—must be held accountable.”

Disability Statement

Please Note: I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.

๐Ÿ“ Formally Logged by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathless Violations Archived.


No comments:

We Are Sick, Silenced, and Left to Suffer Alone.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
WHEN EMAILS ARE IGNORED, SICKNESS DEEPENS: A FAMILY UNDER SIEGE

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Institutional Neglect · Communication Breakdown · Disability Ignored · Medical Harassment · SWANK Health Crisis Report

The Desperate Email

On 14 December 2024, Noelle Meline wrote to Kirsty Hornal and Sarah Newman, copying Laura Savage and Simon O’Meara, Bcc’d to Nannette Nicholson:

“I appreciate you’ve tried to reply, but it took so long that I’m too sick to care anymore.”
“It’s like you think I’m emailing for fun.”
“Despite many emails, no one listens.”
“We have been traumatised by sewer gas poisoning that killed our cat.”
“Hospitals argue while we are dying.”
“We’re accused of child abuse repeatedly for years.”

“Social workers just make us sicker by bothering us.”
“Society is hostile and uncooperative.”
“I’m pursuing lawsuits because no one reads or responds.”
“Even my mother makes me sicker by forcing phone calls.”
“We are isolated and attacked, so we stay home.”
“My kids don’t want to go anywhere because it’s too hostile.”

Disability Statement

Please Note: I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.

๐Ÿ“ Filed & Sealed by:
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Institutional Hostilities Documented.

Labels (≤200 characters):


No comments:

Ten Things You’d Know If You Were Actually Qualified to Hold Power


๐Ÿ–‹ ๐’ฎ๐’ฒ๐’œ๐’ฉ๐’ฆ Dispatch | 12 January 2025
PATTERNS OF ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR: A REFRESHER COURSE FOR THE CONSCIENCELESS

๐Ÿ“ Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ Author: Polly Chromatic
๐Ÿ—‚ Filed Under: Ethical Remediation Toolkit · Social Worker Re-Education · Professional Dignity Collapse · RBKC/WCC Integrity Vacuum · SWANK Moral Restoration Bureau

To the Department Formerly Known as ‘Professionals’:

Glen Peache, Sarah Newman, Eric Wedge-Bull, Kirsty Hornal, Rhiannon Hodgson, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Rachel Pullen, Milena Abdula-Gomes, Samira Issa
Cc: aaforbes@gov.tc, alsmith@gov.tc, Annabelle Kapoor
Bcc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi

✏️ A Public Service Announcement (Disguised as a Lecture)

Somewhere between your safeguarding theatre and the false allegations you mistook for duties, you misplaced your ethical foundations.
Not to worry. I’ve curated a syllabus.

๐Ÿงญ THE LOST CURRICULUM — AN ETHICAL SKELETON KEY

1. Honesty & Transparency
– State your actions plainly. Conceal nothing you’d penalise in others.
→ Impact: Public trust. Currently absent.

2. Fairness & Justice
– No vendettas. No tokenism. No procedural show trials.
→ Impact: Legitimacy, if you remember what that feels like.

3. Respect for Persons
– Interrupting disabled parents mid-breath? Not noble.
→ Impact: Credibility, faintly possible.

4. Accountability
– Stand behind your own paperwork. No ghostwriters in lanyards.
→ Impact: Consequence, at last.

5. Altruism
– Helping someone while punishing their tone? That’s not altruism. That’s performance.
→ Impact: Actual support.

6. Confidentiality
– Private data is not a whisper network.
→ Impact: One less FOI on your desk.

7. Courage
– Write the truth, even if it contradicts your strategy.
→ Impact: Heroism, albeit unfamiliar.

8. Humility
– Try: “We were wrong.” It won’t kill you.
→ Impact: Professional rebirth.

9. Environmental Responsibility
– Stop triggering asthma in medically fragile homes.
→ Impact: Breathable air. Imagine.

10. Professional Integrity
– No falsified notes. No weaponised minutes. No polished lies.
→ Impact: Legal documents that don’t read like satire.

Polly Chromatic
Archivist of Behavioural Decay · Unpaid Ethics Consultant to Her Majesty’s Dismal Services
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Codes of Conduct Archived. All Virtues Filed.


No comments:

When a Child Collapses, He Replies with Procedural Theatre.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 18 February 2024
GLEN RESPONDED—BUT ONLY TO DOWNPLAY THE DAMAGE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Glen Peache · Post-Collapse Dismissals · NHS Gaslighting Partnership · Email Delays · Council Blame Redirection · SWANK Institutional Failure Index

To:

Glen Peache
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Relevant Medical Neglect Units

๐Ÿงพ YOUR “RESPONSE” ARRIVED ONLY AFTER A CHILD COLLAPSED.

“Thank you for your email. I am sorry to hear about your experiences at the hospital and your daughter’s health.”
“Please let me know how you would like me to respond.”

She collapsed.
You emailed.
And somehow still positioned yourself as passive recipient of instruction, rather than a safeguarding officer tasked with preventing medical catastrophe.

๐Ÿซ YOUR NHS PARTNERS NEARLY KILLED HER. YOU PASSED THE COMPLAINT TO THEM?

“We would advise discussing any safeguarding concerns you may have directly with the hospital via their complaints or PALS service.”

This is not a hospital review.
It is an incident of interagency neglect.
And your response confirms a pattern of bureaucratic outsourcing in the face of respiratory collapse.

๐Ÿ“ฉ THIS IS NOT A BACK-AND-FORTH. IT’S AN EVIDENCE TRAIL.

You are not waiting for my “instruction.”
You are being archived—for lethargy in the face of crisis.
Each polite delay will be used in court to evidence structural gaslighting.

Polly Chromatic
Chronically right. Systemically dismissed. Noted accordingly.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Inactions Logged.


No comments:

You Don’t Need to Believe Me. You Need to Treat Her.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
SHE CALLED MY OXYGEN METER “TRASH.” THEN SHE TRIED TO ARGUE WITH MY BREATH.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Verbal Assault in A&E · Oxygen Disbelief · NHS Bullying · Child Medical Disregard · Adjustment Ignorance · SWANK Maternal Defence Archive

To:

Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health

๐Ÿฉธ THE DOCTOR’S FIRST DIAGNOSIS? DISBELIEF.

“She said my oxygen meter is trash. That Honor is fine. That she doesn’t believe me.”
“She insulted my nebuliser too.”

What she offered wasn’t medical care.
It was contempt in latex gloves.

๐Ÿ—ฃ I SAID I COULDN’T SPEAK. SHE KEPT TALKING.

“I had to speak loudly so she would hear me—because she wouldn’t shut up and listen.”

This wasn’t a consultation.
It was an ambush on the voiceless.

⏳ “IT’LL BE HOURS”—SPOKEN AS A THREAT, NOT A FACT.

“She kept repeating it. It was like she wanted me to get angry at her.”

Waiting is protocol.
Weaponising it is malpractice.

๐Ÿ“น FROM THIS POINT FORWARD: WE DOCUMENT EVERYTHING.

“I told her I don’t want to talk anymore. Just treat my daughter.”

Your disbelief is not our diagnosis.
It’s our evidence.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT — IGNORED IN PERSON, PUBLISHED FOR RECORD:

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

The oxygen meter wasn’t broken.
Your system was.

Polly Chromatic
I don’t need to argue. I breathe. I document. I publish.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathless Incidents Indexed.


No comments:

Apparently, Refusing to Argue Is a Problem When You’re a Disabled Mother With Facts.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
THE DOCTOR SAID MY OXYGEN METER IS “TRASH.” THEN SHE TRIED TO ARGUE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Bullying · Verbal Harassment · NHS Abuse · Paediatric Disbelief · Oxygen Meter Gaslighting · SWANK Respiratory Hostility Records

To:

Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health

๐Ÿฅ€ SHE DIDN’T WANT EVIDENCE. SHE WANTED DOMINANCE.

“She said my oxygen meter is trash. That Honor is fine. That she doesn’t believe me.”
“She insulted my nebuliser. Repeated that she didn’t believe anything I said.”

You call this a clinical environment?
It was a bullying chamber in scrubs.

๐Ÿ—ฃ I HAD TO SPEAK LOUDLY—NOT IN DEFIANCE, BUT IN DEFENCE.

“She wouldn’t shut up and listen. She kept repeating herself like she wanted me to get angry.”

Loudness is not hostility when used to escape gaslighting.
It’s the volume of self-preservation.

⏳ THE WAIT WAS WEAPONISED.

“She kept saying it’s gonna be hours. She kept repeating it like a punishment.”

Delay was not neutral.
It was strategic.
She didn’t treat my daughter—she provoked the mother.

๐Ÿ”ด FROM THIS POINT FORWARD: RECORDED. ARCHIVED. SHARED.

“I told her I don’t want to talk anymore. Just treat my daughter.”

If I must bring a USB stick to A&E to get care, so be it.
What I won’t bring is silence.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT, RE-PUBLISHED FOR THE INCOMPETENT:

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Not your curiosity. Not your debate.
This is a clinical adjustment.

Polly Chromatic
Defending oxygen with evidence. Recording disbelief with elegance.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disrespect Archived.


No comments:

Prednisone Was Prescribed, But Disdain Was Delivered.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
SHE WAS COLLAPSING. YOU GAVE HER ANTIBIOTICS—AND NOTHING ELSE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Paediatric Medical Neglect · Prednisone Panic · NHS Collapse Rituals · Chest X-Ray Denial · Telepathic Clarifications · SWANK Respiratory Abuse Archive

To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson

๐Ÿง’๐Ÿฝ HEIR’S TREATMENT TIMELINE—IF ONE DARES CALL IT THAT:

“The hospital didn’t do a chest x-ray.”
“Put Honor on a second antibiotic.”
“Said to give prednisone.”
“Told me to follow up with the GP.”

Diagnosis? None.
Compassion? Missing.
Prescriptions? Abundant.

A checklist masquerading as care.
She was in collapse, and they were performing protocol theatre.

๐Ÿซ THE AFTERMATH WAS PHYSICAL—FOR BOTH OF US:

“Now I can’t breathe after that experience—and I was breathing well before.”
“We just got home.”

Medicine should not require recovery from the visit itself.
But with the NHS, harm is not a side effect. It’s the main event.

๐Ÿฉบ THE EXCEPTION THAT PROVED THE INSTITUTIONAL RULE:

“I would have rather just had Dr Reid do it all…”
“I don’t blame him for their ignorance.”
“Thank you, Dr Reid.”

There are still doctors who understand dignity.
They just don’t seem to be staffing A&E.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (IGNORED, AS ALWAYS):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

They ignored the scan.
They ignored the breath.
They ignored the patient.
But the archive will not ignore them.

Polly Chromatic
Breath held. Truth released.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Omissions Filed.


No comments:

You Let My Daughter Collapse So You Could Blame Me for Breathing Wrong.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
THEY WOULDN’T EVEN DO A CHEST X-RAY. THEN THEY GAVE HER TWO ANTIBIOTICS.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Paediatric Asthma Mismanagement · Medical Gaslighting · Hospital Abuse · Prednisone Protocol · GP Deflection · NHS Incoherence · Telepathic Access Denial

To:

Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson

๐Ÿง’๐Ÿฝ HONOR’S MEDICAL TIMELINE (ABUSE-ADJACENT):

“The hospital didn’t do a chest x-ray.”
“They did finally treat Honor in a short stay room after the doctor abused me.”
“They put her on a second antibiotic.”
“Told me to give her prednisone and albuterol every four hours.”
“Told me to follow up with a GP.”

What they lacked in investigation,
they made up for in prescriptions.

๐Ÿฉบ THE MOTHER HAD DATA. THE SYSTEM HAD DISDAIN.

You dismissed the evidence.
You bypassed the scan.
You outsourced diagnosis to a GP you hadn’t even consulted.
And then had the audacity to insult my access needs.

๐Ÿ’จ SHE WAS BREATHING BEFORE. COLLAPSING AFTER.

“We just got home.”
“Now I can’t breathe—and I was breathing well before.”
“I’m so disgusted with the hospitals.”

This isn’t post-care fatigue.
It’s systemic injury disguised as treatment.

๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿฝ ONE PROFESSIONAL, ONE NOTE OF GRACE:

“I would have rather just had Dr Reid do all of it.”
“Thank you so much, Dr Reid.”

The rest acted like my daughter’s chest was a theory.
He treated it like a reality.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (REPEATED AD NAUSEAM):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Still ignored. Still lawful. Still binding.
If you can’t accommodate, you can’t assess.

Polly Chromatic
Mother, analyst, witness—reporting live from the breathless state of care.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breaths Counted.


No comments:

The Only Adjustment We’re Asking For Is Oxygen, Not Opinion.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE DON’T HAVE TIME TO ARGUE. WE’RE TOO BUSY BREATHING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Disability · Verbal Assault · Hospital Gaslighting · Adjustment Refusal · Child Medical Neglect · NHS Argument Addiction · Telepathic Justice · SWANK Clarification Mandate

To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health

๐Ÿ—ฃ WHAT I SAID—IN BREATHS, NOT BARKS

“I don’t appreciate the way they treat us when we go to the hospital unable to breathe—when we can’t defend ourselves verbally.”
“All they want to do is argue.”
“We don’t have time or respiratory capacity to do that.”
“To make matters worse, after they abuse us, everyone blames me. And when my kids get older, they will be treated the same way unless it changes now.”

This is not reluctance.
It’s triage by necessity.
When survival is breath-counted, debate is malpractice.

⚠️ THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION. IT’S A DIAGNOSIS

“We cannot have a discussion and argument about whether or not we are really unable to breathe.”
“All they needed to do was check Honor. But they wanted to argue instead.”

What passes for protocol in your institution is indistinguishable from obstruction.

๐Ÿง  BREATH-BASED ACCESS, NOT BUREAUCRATIC THEATRE

“I don’t want to discuss it beyond the basic facts. But even repeating the same basic facts repeatedly is too much for my lungs.”
“They ought to be providing adjustments so that I don’t need to speak to them at all—let alone argue.”

You were not hired as cross-examiners.
You were employed to protect.
Start there.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (NEVER HONOURED, NOW ARCHIVED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Yet your system continues to demand breath over bandwidth.

Polly Chromatic
My lungs aren’t for your suspicion. My speech isn’t for your sport.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Adjustments Filed.


No comments:

Apparently, That’s Offensive.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE DON’T ARGUE. WE BREATHE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Verbal Hostility · Hospital Gaslighting · Disability Disrespect · Child Medical Neglect · A&E Verbalism · Respiratory Mismanagement · SWANK Defence of Breath

To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health

๐Ÿ“ฃ WHAT I SAID (NOT THAT THEY LISTENED):

“I don’t appreciate the way they treat us when we go to the hospital unable to breathe—when we can’t defend ourselves verbally.”
“All they want to do is argue.”
“We don’t have time or respiratory capacity to do that.”

The last thing a mother should need in the A&E is rhetorical stamina.
Yet this system insists on performance—over pulse, posture, or protocol.

๐Ÿ‘ถ๐Ÿฝ ON BEHALF OF MY DAUGHTER:

“It’s very straightforward. All they needed to do was check Honor.”
“But they wanted to argue about it instead.”

This isn’t a failure to understand.
It’s a refusal to accommodate—deliberate, rehearsed, and increasingly cruel.

๐ŸŒ€ SYSTEMIC ABUSE, THEN BLAME:

“After they abuse us, everyone blames me.”
“And when my kids get older, they will be treated the same way unless it changes now.”

You’ve confused safeguarding with antagonism.
And weaponised authority against the breathless.

๐Ÿง  VERBAL EFFORT IS A PRIVILEGE, NOT YOUR ENTITLEMENT:

“It’s exhausting for us to do simple things like talk.”
“Apparently other people can talk more easily because they waste it on arguing.”
“We only talk when it’s meaningful.”

We do not owe you discourse.
We owe our lungs oxygen, not defence.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT (ETERNALLY NEEDED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Verbalism is not care. It is coercion.
And we document every syllable you try to extract unlawfully.

Polly Chromatic
Archiving the violence of disbelief. Refusing to breathe for your benefit.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Inhales Indexed.


No comments:

Three Problems, One Condition, No Compassion.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE JUST WANT TO BREATHE—NOT BE BLAMED FOR EXISTING.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Disbelief · Respiratory Torture · Social Rejection · Asthma Isolation · Telepathic Clarity · NHS Hostility · School Gaslighting · Chronic Misunderstanding · SWANK Testimonial Evidence File

๐Ÿ“ To:

Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Harley Street Mental Health, Nannette Nicholson

❌ THREE RECURRING INSTITUTIONAL FAILURES:

  1. Defensive hospital staff who treat symptoms as accusations.

  2. Protocol defiance and diagnostic laziness, dressed in lanyards.

  3. Gaslighting as standard—“We don’t believe you” as a care plan.

Dr Arjumand repeated—several times—“I don’t believe you,”
while I was visibly, audibly, physiologically struggling to breathe.
My children watched. No one intervened. Again.

๐Ÿซ THE LONGEST SYMPTOM: DISBELIEF

“My whole life, I’ve had to explain my inability to breathe—and still not be believed.”
“From classrooms to clinics, I’ve been called dramatic, then blamed for being right.”
“Now my children are punished for their lungs, and I’m vilified for defending them.”

There is no gas stronger than medical contempt.
And no inhaler for institutional ego.

๐Ÿ‘ HUMANITY REQUIRES MIRRORING—NOT SURVEILLANCE

“Blind people have blind friends. Deaf people have deaf friends.
Even racial communities seek mutual comfort.”
“We want friends who breathe like us. Who understand what it means to survive the air.”
“I breastfed all four of my children to prevent this illness. They got it anyway.
And they are still the only ones who understand me.”

This isn’t martyrdom. It’s physiology.
And you’re not listening. You’re watching with a clipboard.

๐Ÿ’ก OUR REQUESTS (WRITTEN, AS ALWAYS):

  • Respect the written access adjustment.

  • Treat us without interrogation.

  • Stop requiring verbal performance to access care.

  • Believe the data, not your mood.

  • Stop punishing asthmatic existence.

๐Ÿ“Ž ACCESS STATEMENT: STILL VALID. STILL IGNORED.

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

This is not ambiguity.
This is refusal to perform your preferred pantomime of health.

Polly Chromatic
Mother of four. Truth-teller by breath. Refuser of bureaucratic delusion.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disbelief Cross-Examined.


No comments:

When Breathing Is Treated Like a Social Offence.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE MOVED FOR FRIENDSHIP. YOU GAVE US ASTHMA SHAME.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Asthma Discrimination · Social Misreading · Community Hostility · Verbal Disability · British Allergy to Vulnerability · Snobbish Expat Testimony · SWANK Statement on Medical Intolerance

๐Ÿ“จ WHAT I WROTE (AND YOU MISREAD):

“We felt isolated in Turks and Caicos and came here because we love the people and socialising…”
“However people here don’t like that we have asthma.”
“It’s like you are all angry at us for having asthma. Period. That’s how we feel.”
(But we feel better now that you are all helping.)

The irony, of course, is that you were never helping.
You were reacting—to our breath, our boldness, our refusal to perform wellness for your comfort.

๐Ÿ’จ A BREATHING OFFENCE IN A NATION OF SIDE-EYES

I arrived under the illusion that the UK was a place of civility and inclusion.
Instead, I found a kingdom where asthma is treated like insolence—
and breathlessness is met with bureaucratic punishment.

You whisper behind clipboards.
You raise eyebrows at oxygen monitors.
You blame the disabled for disrupting your illusion of order.

๐Ÿง  STILL TELEPATHIC. STILL DISMISSED.

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

And still—
I must explain my lungs.
Justify my sentences.
Rationalise my silence.
To those who claim to support.

๐Ÿ“Ž CONCLUSION:

We moved for friendship.
We got forms.
We came for inclusion.
We got inspection.
We sought community.
We found clinical disdain.

Polly Chromatic
Expatriate of Hope. Archivist of Breath-Based Rejection.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathings Monitored. All Silences Filed.


No comments:

The United Kingdom of Respiratory Resentment.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024
WE MOVED HERE TO SOCIALISE. YOU MADE US SICK.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Asthma Stigma · Social Exclusion · Disability Discrimination · Verbal Adjustment Ignored · Hostility by Health Status · Snobby Expat Observations · SWANK Sovereignty Log

๐Ÿ’ฌ FROM THE RECORD (AND STILL NOT READ):

“We felt isolated in Turks and Caicos and came here because we love the people and socialising…”
“…however people here don’t like that we have asthma.”
“It’s like you are all angry at us for having asthma. Period. That’s how we feel.”
(But we feel better now that you are all helping.)

How British.
The nation that prides itself on queues, etiquette, and empathy—
couldn’t stomach a child with a nebuliser.

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง A VERY BRITISH IRONY:

We left the tropics for community.
Instead, we found shame with side-eye.
Here, you’re punished not for speaking too loudly—
but for breathing too audibly.

Asthma became our accent.
And you made it foreign.

๐Ÿง  ACCESS STATEMENT (REPEATED IN EVERY EMAIL, IGNORED IN EVERY ROOM):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

But in Westminster’s elite social script:

– Inhalers are uncouth
– Telepathy is impolite
– Email is invisible
– And asthma is a personal offence

We asked for community.
You offered performance notes.

Polly Chromatic
Moved for connection. Received bureaucracy. Documenting every exhale.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swankarchive.com
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Stigmas Archived. All Illnesses Public.


No comments:

If You Refuse to Treat Us, At Least Do It Quietly.


๐Ÿ–‹ SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I CAN’T ARGUE. I’M BREATHING. PICK ONE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Respiratory Endangerment · A&E Hostility · Medical Gaslighting · Child Treatment Refusal · Verbal Disability · NHS Bullying · SWANK Pre-Litigation Catalogue

To: Kirsty Hornal, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Sarah Newman
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Gideon Mpalanyi, Dr Philip Reid
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Doyenne of Telepathic Correspondence

๐Ÿ’ฌ THE LINES THEY STILL PRETEND NOT TO HEAR:

“No one will tell me what the ‘erratic’ behaviour was, given that I’ve only said I want treatment and can’t argue due to respiratory strain.”
“When a woman in the waiting area was abusing me, they blamed me.”
“All the hospitals share the same hatred and ignorance of asthma.”
“They refuse to treat my kids more than they refuse to treat me.”
“I’m going to sue them. It’s child neglect.”

๐Ÿง  VERBAL AUSTERITY STATEMENT:

I do not argue.
I breathe.

If you want to help—help.
If you don’t—move.
I will not waste oxygen proving my suffering to those who monetise disbelief.

๐Ÿงฌ ACCESS STATEMENT (STAMPED, SENT, IGNORED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Every refusal is now a receipt.
Every conversation denied is a case number pending.

๐Ÿ“Ž PRE-SUIT REMINDER:

You refused access.
You denied medical care.
You blamed me for needing it.

And now you’re logged.
Publicly. Permanently. Procedurally.

Polly Chromatic
Gaslit, blamed, untreated—and now suing.
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com

Search Description:
A&E refused to treat asthmatic mother and children, then blamed them for needing care. Polly Chromatic files pre-litigation documentation.

Labels:
Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Philip Reid, NHS asthma refusal, St Thomas’, St Mary’s, Chelsea & Westminster, A&E abuse, verbal disability, child neglect, SWANK legal threat file

No comments:

Documented Obsessions