⟡ “It’s Been Ten Years of Disruption — And We’re Still Not Left Alone” ⟡
A Verbal Disability Reminder, A Homeschooling Disruption Report, and Ten Years of Silence Rebranded as Involvement
Filed: 30 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-07
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-30_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_HomeEducation_DisruptionComplaint.pdf
Email complaint noting long-term disruption to home education and repeated social worker absences. Reaffirms verbal disability and written-only contact requirement.
I. What Happened
On 30 January 2025, Polly Chromatic sent an email addressed to:
Social worker Kirsty Hornal
GP Dr. Philip Reid
Legal advocate Laura Savage
RBKC’s Gideon Mpalanyi
The message stated, clearly: “It’s been very disruptive to homeschooling to have social workers disrupting our day for ten years for no reason and all the no shows are irritating to us all.”
It also reiterated an essential legal boundary: “I cannot speak verbally. Please email only. I do not own a phone.”
No accommodation was made. No change occurred.
Instead, the interruptions continued — and the “no-shows” accumulated alongside procedural harassment.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
A written disability adjustment reiteration
A formal statement on the impact of government interference on educational provision
Long-term disruption treated as normative rather than exceptional
Verbal disability ignored despite direct notice
Institutional indifference to routine procedural inconvenience framed as “support”
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because every social worker absence is filed as “non-engagement,” while every parental withdrawal is framed as neglect.
This email is the counter-narrative: a legally documented notice that the system was the disruption. And that the silence from institutions — when confronted with these facts — was not incidental. It was chosen.
SWANK logs this because educational stability is not a luxury, and neither is the legal right to written communication.
IV. SWANK’s Position
This was not an update. It was a boundary, reasserted.
And once again, ignored.
We do not accept that ten years of disruption can be called “involvement.”
We do not accept that verbal disability must be re-declared every month to remain valid.
We will document every instance where absence was reframed as support — and every contact made in defiance of medical fact.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.