“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label RBKC Non-Engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RBKC Non-Engagement. Show all posts

In Re: The Emergency Filing That Was Answered With a Link to a Toilet Assistance Form Or, How RBKC Perfected the Art of Outsourcing Human Dignity to Google Forms


⟡ The Borough That Answered Emergency Claims With a Referral Link for Showering Support ⟡

Or, When RBKC Suggested That Emotional Deprivation Could Be Solved by Shopping Help

Metadata

Filed: 4 July 2025
Reference Code: SWANK/RBKC/AUTO/SILENCE
Filed by: Polly Chromatic 
Filed from: W2 6JL
Court File Name:
2025-07-04_ZC25C50281_Automatic_Reply_RBKC_Safeguarding_Matters.pdf

I. What Happened

On 4 July 2025, the Claimant submitted a formal safeguarding update to RBKC regarding:

  • The unlawful seizure of her four U.S. citizen children

  • The absence of lawful threshold

  • Ongoing legal claims involving Westminster and RBKC

  • Institutional racism, medical neglect, and forced separation

The reply?

“Thank you for your email. Please use our new online referral form if you would like advice on washing, dressing, or going to the toilet.”

II. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when you file a legal notice about racial discrimination, safeguarding misuse, and international legal violations — and the reply suggests help with cleaning and shopping,
what you have received is not assistance, but theatrical redirection.

Because this was a safeguarding complaint, not a domestic mobility issue.

Because the inbox for child protection is now apparently rerouted to the same form used for “looking after yourself.”

Because no human name, no acknowledgment of the case, no reference to the children or legal filings appeared —
only a message about business hours and bathing.

III. SWANK’s Position

SWANK London Ltd. hereby classifies this email as:

  • Disrespectful

  • Administratively evasive

  • And emblematic of the bureaucratic reduction of crisis into a tickbox menu

This was not a response. It was a safeguarding eclipse.

We log it not as communication, but as a semi-automated barrier designed to reclassify emergency as inconvenience.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments: