“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label no support. Show all posts
Showing posts with label no support. Show all posts

She Was Stabilised. I Wasn’t. You Didn’t Notice Either.


⟡ She Got Her Medicine. I Couldn’t Breathe. You Called It Non-Engagement. ⟡
“After she was discharged, I collapsed. You never asked why.”

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAILS-22
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailUpdate_WCC-Honor_PostTreatmentReaction_DisabilityImpact.pdf
Post-treatment update to Westminster Children’s Services documenting Honor’s medication plan, continued safeguarding hostility, and the parent’s medical collapse following prolonged system stress and mistreatment.

I. What Happened

On the night of 21 November 2024, after a day of respiratory crisis, hospital discharge, and unrelenting institutional tension, the parent:

  • Summarised Honor’s discharge instructions and medication

  • Explained that no further social work contact was appropriate at this stage

  • Noted she had collapsed shortly after returning home, due to respiratory and psychiatric strain

  • Reaffirmed that she is medically exempt from verbal contact

  • Attached a copy of the updated GP treatment plan and her child’s response to care

The message was clear:

You’ve been informed. You’ve been warned. The record is closed — and archived.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Westminster received written confirmation of Honor’s condition and care

  • That the parent explicitly requested no further direct contact while medically unwell

  • That no support was offered following the parent’s collapse

  • That prior disability adjustments were disregarded despite severe health consequences

  • That the safeguarding team continued its posture of scrutiny, not aid

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when you collapse after being silenced,
and the system asks if you’re “engaging,”
you’re not in a partnership — you’re in a trap.

Because when your daughter gets medication,
and you get retaliation,
that’s not miscommunication — that’s abuse.

And because when your only method of speaking is writing,
you learn how to file faster than they can respond.

IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Section 20 & 27
    Failure to honour communication adjustment; retaliation after disability assertion

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Articles 3 and 8
    Inhumane treatment via administrative indifference and emotional neglect

  • Care Act 2014 – Emergency Response Duty
    No support provided to a medically collapsing carer with dependents

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Refusal to support the welfare of the household during health breakdown

V. SWANK’s Position

She got her antibiotics.
We got ignored.
She started healing.
I stopped breathing.

You didn’t ask what happened.
You asked if I was “engaging.”

So we sent you the answer —
in a file.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions