“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label NHS discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NHS discrimination. Show all posts

Chromatic v The NHS: On the Logistics of Discrimination and the Administration of Breath



🪞SWANK LOG ENTRY

The Prescription of Punishment

Or, Why the NHS Believes a Breathless Mother Should Collect Her Own Oxygen


Filed: 2 November 2024
Reference Code: SWK-ASTHMA-DISCRIMINATION-2024-11
PDF Filename: 2024-11-02_SWANK_Letter_Westminster_NHSPrescriptionBarrier.pdf
One-Line Summary: Polly Chromatic explains why she still cannot access biological asthma treatment — because the system requires breath before it provides breathing support.


I. What Happened

On 1 November 2024, Polly Chromatic attended a respiratory appointment at Brompton. The subject: biological asthma treatment, the only long-term solution for eosinophilic asthma — a condition she and all four of her children have.

The conclusion? She still hasn’t started treatment.

Why?
Because the NHS insists she physically pick up prescriptions each month, speak by phone to an uncooperative GP, and solve systemic failures… while she can’t breathe.

This is what happens when reasonable adjustments are refused — and asthma becomes a test of stamina rather than a clinical diagnosis.


II. What the Complaint Establishes

This message reveals a structural absurdity in disability care:

  • Monthly prescription pickup is mandatory, despite chronic breathlessness

  • Digital options (e.g. NHS app) are blocked

  • No alternative plan has been offered

  • Pharmacy staff had to offer the only workable solution

  • The GP has been consistently unhelpful

This is not a clinical failure — it’s a logistical one, with discriminatory consequences.


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because “you must collect your own oxygen while struggling to breathe” is not a policy — it’s performance art.

Because access to biological treatment shouldn’t require superhuman endurance or administrative warfare.

Because no health system that calls itself compassionate should punish people for the very symptoms it refuses to accommodate.

And because asthma management shouldn’t depend on whether a disabled mother can out-navigate a GP receptionist.


IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Failure to provide reasonable adjustments for chronic disability

  • Article 8 ECHR – Infringement on private and family life through medical obstruction

  • Clinical Negligence – Prolonged lack of access to treatment due to procedural design

  • Administrative Cruelty – Expecting the breathless to chase breath

  • Safeguarding Sabotage – Refusal to facilitate stable medical care for an asthmatic family


V. SWANK’s Position

We consider this email a case study in infrastructural discrimination: the kind that doesn’t scream in your face — it just whispers, “call again tomorrow.”

The NHS did not deny Polly care outright. It simply created conditions where accessing that care would require either superhuman coordination or the miraculous suspension of all asthma symptoms.

Let the archive reflect: the issue is not that she hasn’t tried — it’s that they haven’t.

And in the time it takes for one GP to return a phone call, another child’s lungs tighten.


⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Stop Expecting Us to Breathe Like You Do



🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“Therapy Is Not a Cure for Institutional Ableism”

Filed Under: Adjustment Denied · Therapy Blocked · Disability Misunderstood · Verbal Coercion · Community Exclusion · SWANK London Ltd

Dear Kirsty,

“I’d love to go to therapy but no one will provide adjustments for my disability needs…”

That is not defiance.
That is the documentation of exclusion.

Not a lack of willingness — a lack of access.
Not refusal — obstruction.
A blockade made of unacknowledged needs and verbal tyranny disguised as procedure.

“This limits my ability as well as my kids’ ability to integrate into the community at all.”

And yet, the blame lands on us—
As though exclusion were a matter of attitude, not architecture.

“You keep expecting us to behave like people who don’t have a disability, and we can’t.”

Can’t, not won’t.
That difference defines the law.
Your refusal to grasp it is not a misunderstanding. It is a violation.

“Someone needs to call the mental health practice and help them understand…”

Indeed. Because until they comprehend communication that does not rely on breath and noise,
therapy is not therapy.
It is a performative corridor of pain, lined with clinical ignorance.

You do not get to say I “declined support” when no support was ever offered in an accessible form.

📍 Untherapised by Refusal, Not Resistance
Polly Chromatic
Advocate of Non-Verbal Integrity
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Adjustments Enforced.


Coherence, Alignment, and the Ethics of Output



⟡ When the Hospital Refuses to Treat You and Calls a Social Worker Instead ⟡
“I went to breathe. They sent police. And now I need a psychologist to recover from the psychologist they sabotaged.”

Filed: 30 October 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC-NHS/EMAILS-04
📎 Download PDF – 2024-10-30_SWANK_EmailSummary_WCC_MedicalNeglect_SafeguardingRetaliation.pdf
Formal written summary to Westminster staff outlining a one-year pattern of NHS neglect, racialised assumptions, police overreach, and social work retaliation.


I. What Happened

On 30 October 2024, the parent submitted an email to Westminster Children’s Services detailing an unbroken chain of trauma and procedural abuse:

  • Five asthma attacks treated as behavioural issues in A&E

  • Two hospitals that refused care while summoning social services

  • Accusations of abuse during active medical distress

  • A birthday ruined by police in a hotel room while the parent was seeking urgent care

  • Social workers who lied to a treating psychologist, blocking access to mental health support

The email is addressed to Kirsty Hornal. It does not contain legal theory. It contains testimony.

And now it contains a record.


II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That racial and disability profiling in NHS emergency departments triggered unnecessary safeguarding referrals

  • That the family experienced dual-agency trauma — medical dismissal followed by social work escalation

  • That psychiatric care was actively sabotaged by the institution claiming to be concerned

  • That children were directly harmed by the institutional response to their mother’s health crisis

  • That no institution — not the hospital, nor social services — acted to repair the harm caused


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when you go to the hospital to get air, and leave with a social worker — you’re not being assessed.
You’re being profiled.

Because when nine police officers are sent to a hotel on your child’s birthday — it’s not support.
It’s a message.

Because when a psychologist is contacted and misled to stop her from treating you —
You are not under care.
You are under control.

This email is not just a trauma log.
It is an institutional map of harm, sent to the very people who orchestrated it.

And now, it is archived.


IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Sections 19 and 20
    Discrimination by association (race), failure to implement medical and psychiatric adjustments

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Harm to children through unjustified intervention and prolonged distress

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Articles 3, 6, 8, 14
    Degrading treatment; denial of private life, health support, and fair process

  • Data Protection Act 2018 / UK GDPR
    Misuse of personal data to block access to independent psychological care

  • NHS Duty of Care (Common Law + GMC Guidelines)
    Negligence in treatment during respiratory emergency, racialised escalation


V. SWANK’s Position

This was not a safeguarding concern.
It was a multi-agency breakdown engineered through institutional arrogance.

This was not “confusion” between services.
It was discrimination passed between departments like liability hot-potato.

The trauma is cumulative.
The response is performative.
And the archive is permanent.

We said we couldn’t breathe.
You gave us a referral.
We sent you an email.
Now we file it.


This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.