SAR Filed. Adjustments Declared. Now You Have 30 Days.

---

⟡ SWANK Data Rights Archive ⟡

“I Didn’t Ask for My Rights. I Asserted Them in Writing.”
Filed: 15 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/NHS/SAR/STTHOMAS/FAMILY-DATA
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-15_SWANK_SAR_StThomas_Hospital_FamilyDataRequest_DisabilityAdjustmentAsserted.pdf

---

I. This Was Not a Request. It Was a Formal Declaration.

On 15 May 2025, SWANK London Ltd. filed a Subject Access Request (SAR) to Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust — not in search of kindness, but in assertion of law.

It was not written emotionally.

It was written in statute, in clinical citation, and with the weight of five lives attached.

This letter demands:

• All personal data relating to the Director and her four children

• All safeguarding records, professional correspondence, and redacted insults

• All decisions made without consent, but in her name

---

II. What the SAR Declares

• The written-only communication adjustment is not negotiable

• The hospital’s failures to respect this adjustment amount to:

  • Disability discrimination (Equality Act 2010)

  • Procedural retaliation

  • Obstruction of subject access rights (UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018)

• The letter anchors its legal weight in:

  • Article 8 (Right to Private Life)

  • Article 6 (Right to Fair Process)

  • Clinical evidence: Dr. Irfan Raaiq’s written-only adjustment, November 2024

This wasn’t “just” a SAR.

It was a document of dominion over data, medical record, and narrative integrity.

---

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because we’ve had enough of:

• Phone calls disguised as policy

• Verbal access gatekept by kindness

• Data locked in filing systems that respond only to tone, not law

We filed it because:

• Your voice isn’t the price of your rights

• Written-only is not unusual — it’s strategic and documented

• Medical trauma is not a reason to exclude someone from their own file

Let the record show:

The SAR was sent.
The rights were cited.
The tone was firm.
And the archive — now contains the proof.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not wait for data to be “found.”
We demand it — legally, formally, and in writing.

We do not beg for respect.
We assert the law, the diagnosis, and the authority of our own archive.

Let the record show:

The SAR was filed under UK GDPR.
The deadline now ticks.
And the NHS has no excuse left but silence — or compliance.

This wasn’t a request.
It was a documented refusal to be erased.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

---

⟡ Clear Scans, Clouded Judgment: The Radiological Elegance of Doing Nothing ⟡

---

⟡ Steroids, Scans & Shrugs: A Diagnostic Chronicle of Institutional Disinterest ⟡
Filed: 29 February 2024
Reference: SWANK/SMH/ASTHMA-BONE-XRAY-2024
📎 Download PDF — 2024-02-29_SWANK_SMH_DiagnosticChronicle_AsthmaSteroidBone_XRaySeries.pdf

---

I. When the Scan Is Clear but the System Is Clouded

This archive entry contains radiological reports from St Mary’s Hospital (Imperial NHS Trust), covering:

• Ongoing obstructive lung disease (asthma with hyperinflation)

• Steroid-induced osteopenia (documented but untreated)

• Mobility-impairing knee symptoms dismissed as radiographically trivial

No intervention.
No follow-up.
No comprehension of cumulative clinical degradation.

A tidy stack of imaging. A towering heap of nothing done.

---

II. Highlights from the Elegant Nothingness

• Chest X-rays (2024–2025): Hyperinflated lungs, no pneumonia, no plan.
  "Asthma AE" reduced to no consolidation noted. The bar for care? Collapse.

• DEXA Scan (Oct 2023): T-scores -1.6. “Below average for age.”
  Translation: early-stage bone deterioration. NHS translation: Ignore.

• Knee X-ray (June 2023): No fracture.
  Ergo: No further inquiry. Pain, weight-bearing difficulty, and mobility impact? Not radiologically photogenic enough.

---

III. Why SWANK Filed This

Because the accumulation of unremarkable reports in a deteriorating body is not reassurance. It’s gaslight-by-printout.

This document captures the exquisite choreography of bureaucratic healthcare:

• Scan → minimise

• Symptom → compartmentalise

• Systemic risk → defer

This is not medicine. It’s aesthetic restraint performed as policy.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not believe clinical neglect is excused by normal scans.
We do not accept “no fracture” as clearance to ignore collapsing joints.
We do not accept lung disease that must present as melodrama to be acknowledged.

Let the archive show:

• The asthma is real

• The bone loss is real

• The indifference — was immaculate

This was not “no findings.”
It was no duty of care.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Breathe, Bruise, Deny: A Diagnostic Ballet of Dismissal

---

⟡ Osteopenia, Obstruction & Orthopaedic Dismissal: The Diagnostic Series They’d Prefer to Misfile ⟡
Filed: 7 June 2023 (updated through 2025)
Reference: SWANK/SMH/CLIN-DIAG/ASTHMA-BONE-JOINT
📎 Download PDF — 2023-06-07_SWANK_SMH_DiagnosticReports_KneeBoneLungAsthmaSeries.pdf

---

I. When the Body Instructs, and the System Refuses to Learn

This dossier is not a complaint. It is a radiographic biography — a procession of neglected diagnostics trailing behind policy contempt.

Across knees, lungs, bone and breath, it chronicles:

• Chronic asthma under steroid regimes

• Emerging osteopenia misclassified as “normal for age”

• Left knee collapse dismissed with bureaucratic minimalism

• Two chest x-rays showing obstructive lung disease in full inflation — but zero pulmonary intervention

They saw inflammation.
They reported “no consolidation.”
They missed everything in between.

---

II. What the Reports Reveal (and Refuse to Mean)

1. 7 June 2023 – Knee XRAY
   Result: “No fracture.”
   Translation: You can walk, therefore you must.
   Clinical impact: Weight-bearing agony ignored due to lack of theatrical evidence.

2. 18 October 2023 – Bone Density Scan (DEXA)
   Result: T-score of -1.6 at the hip.
   Classification: “Below average for age.”
   What it should say: Early deterioration induced by chronic respiratory steroids — noted and ignored.

3. 30 April & 17 March 2025 – Chest XRAYS
   Result: “Lungs hyperinflated.”
   Interpretation: Clear sign of obstructive airway disease (asthma), yet no action. No bronchodilator plan. No referral. Just the word “noted.”

Their job was not to scan. It was to see.

---

III. Why SWANK Filed This

Because the denial of injury is not the absence of harm.
Because normal scans in disabled bodies are often used as instruments of dismissal.

This record asserts:

• That early-stage deterioration matters

• That obstructive lungs do not need to collapse to be breathless

• That bone loss without a fall is still failure

It is not the body that has failed to signal.
It is the institution that has failed to respond.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not regard “no fracture” as permission to collapse.
We do not accept “within expected range” as clinical resolution.
We do not tolerate the systemic erasure of diagnostic complexity in disabled and steroid-dependent patients.

Let the archive reflect:

• The asthma was known

• The bone loss was documented

• The knee pain was real

• The language was clinical

• The disregard — was institutional

This was not “nothing wrong.”
It was everything ignored.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.