⟡ “Does Anyone Want My Perspective?” ⟡
*A Written-Only Parent Maps the Entire Abuse Loop — and Offers the Solution No One Requested
Filed: 24 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-11
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-24_SWANK_Email_Westminster_DisabilityAbuseCycle_CommunicationAdjustmentProposal.pdf
Email identifying the repeating abuse cycle caused by verbal contact pressure and asthma dismissal. Offers solutions including GP-backed A&E access and verbal-free protocols.
I. What Happened
On 24 November 2024, Polly Chromatic submitted a clear and emotionally grounded breakdown of the institutional abuse cycle surrounding her and her children. It had two parts:
Verbal contact pressure, which exacerbates her asthma
Medical gaslighting, which results in her and her children being denied care
She wrote:
“Everyone tries to force me to explain things verbally repeatedly, which exacerbates my asthma — and they also get angry if I try to communicate via email.”
Then she asked, plainly:
“Does anyone want my perspective?”
She didn’t stop there. She proposed solutions:
A disability advocate for her family
A GP-issued letter for A&E
Hospital protocols that eliminate the need for verbal speech
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That verbal contact pressure constitutes disability-based harm
That asthma-related A&E dismissal forms a repeatable institutional loop
That the refusal to accept written communication creates a system that both triggers illness and blames the response
That disabled individuals are left to solve the system’s failure themselves
That this email is both diagnosis and remedy — and no one followed up
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because if you need a flowchart to survive public health systems, you’ve already been failed.
This email is both a cry for help and a policy draft. It says: here’s the problem, and here’s what would fix it. And it’s addressed to every tier of authority — GP, solicitor, social worker, and mental health.
SWANK logs it not because it’s emotional, but because it’s surgical.
When institutions refuse to admit the pattern, disabled people must file it themselves.
IV. SWANK’s Position
This wasn’t erratic.
It was cartography.
We do not accept that “asthma” should mean learning to reverse-engineer the NHS.
We do not accept that children must suffer to prove a mother isn’t unstable.
We will document every time someone offered the solution — and the state left it unread.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.