“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label False Allegations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label False Allegations. Show all posts

You Confused Asthma With Intoxication. I Confused You With a Professional.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 18 February 2024

I AM MORE SOBER THAN MOST OF THE HUMAN POPULATION.

Filed Under: Safeguarding Fabrication, NHS Gaslighting, False Allegations, Legal Clarification, Hospital Harassment, Disability Misinterpretation, Parenting Stigma

📎 SUBJECT: Your Concern Is Fiction. My Footage Is Fact.

To: Samira Issa
CC’d: Eric Wedge-Bull, Glen Peache, NHS Complaints, Three Hospitals, All the Lies You’ve Spread
From: Polly Chromatic

“I am more sober than most of the human population.”

Imagine being accused of intoxication — not because of slurred speech, not because of substance use — but because you have asthma. Because you can’t breathe.

This is not safeguarding.
This is slander in a safeguarding costume.

🧠 POINT ONE:

“I have a respiratory disability and therefore am and always have been very against anything unhealthy including drugs, drinking alcohol, smoking, and eating sugar/carbohydrates.”

This isn’t lifestyle. It’s survival.
You’re accusing a woman who’s medically exempt from verbal conversation of substance use — because she struggled to speak.

🧠 POINT TWO:

“Why would me being intoxicated at the hospital without my children be any cause for concern about my children anyway?”

A logical question. Answer it if you can.
You won’t — because this isn’t about logic.
It’s about control and discrediting.

📜 LEGAL EDUCATION FOR YOU (AGAIN):

Noelle’s children are:
14, 12, 9, and 6.
Per UK law:

  • Parents are permitted to use their judgement.

  • It is not a crime to leave mature children alone.

  • It is not the hospital’s job to invent scenarios that didn’t happen.

🔊 THE EVIDENCE:

🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZnrkgymrPg

This is not anecdote.
This is an audio-visual record of hospital misconduct, uploaded and archived —
because emails weren’t enough.

🏥 THE REALITY IN THE ER:

  • Nurses claiming she could breathe — because she spoke

  • Refusal of adequate treatment

  • Accusations of shouting when she was pleading

  • A nebuliser cut short

  • A doctor’s attitude change triggered by misinformation

  • A black doctor denying care, referencing past records written with bias

  • A woman leaving, untreated, breathless — yet again

💥 THE LINGERING TRUTH:

“I’m still very concerned and confused as to why I am being treated this way…”
“I am very sick.”
“I have made five emergency room visits since October 2023 after exposure to sewer fumes.”
“I have still not received appropriate care.”

You don’t need a case conference.
You need a judicial review.

Polly Chromatic
Asthmatic. Documented. Sober. Still being harassed.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, safeguarding abuse, hospital false report, NHS retaliation, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, false intoxication claim, asthma not alcohol, sewer gas aftermath, legal clarity, parenting discrimination, written-only boundary ignored, medical record corruption

No comments:

I’m High Risk, Not High Drama — Leave Me Alone So I Can Breathe

 📮 SWANK Dispatch: My Asthma Is Not a Crime — But Your Harassment Might Be

🗓️ 30 June 2020

Filed Under: asthma discrimination, shielding violation, health harassment, false accusations, community hostility, pandemic vulnerability, NHS guidance ignored, public health failure, legal retaliation

“My diagnosis is severe eosinophilic asthma.
Not ‘difficult mother.’ Not ‘suspicious parent.’
Just: a person who cannot survive your ignorance.”
— A Mother Documenting Medical Fact as Legal Shield

This sharply articulated letter by Polly Chromatic, addressed to the Department of Social Development, is not merely a declaration of illness — it is a legally grounded plea for respect, space, and air.

It outlines her decades-long history with a life-threatening medical condition — severe eosinophilic asthma — and how local hostility, institutional ignorance, and social work overreach have placed her and her children at risk.

🧾 I. The Medical Facts Are Not Up for Debate

From the NHS (UK) and CDC (USA):

  • Polly is clinically extremely vulnerable (high risk)

  • She is on continuous oral steroids (prednisone)

  • Shielding guidance includes:

    • No uninvited visitors

    • Avoidance of all triggers (disinfectants, perfumes, stress, smoke, etc.)

    • Calm environments essential for asthma control

⚠️ II. What the Department Has Done Instead

  • Ignored shielding protocol

  • Repeatedly allowed false child abuse allegations based on lifestyle accommodations (no smoking, no toxic products, etc.)

  • Permitted harassment from neighbours who resist her boundaries

  • Created stressful encounters with social workers and truancy officers during a global respiratory pandemic

  • Continued to operate in a way that increases her risk of hospitalisation or death

🧠 III. Clarifying the Actual Issue

This is not about parenting.
This is not about truancy.
This is not about attitude.

This is about:

  • Medical discrimination

  • Public misunderstanding of asthma

  • Systemic punishment of individuals who enforce their own health boundaries

  • Abuse of statutory resources to pursue false claims while ignoring medical law

📌 Final Point:

“False allegations of child abuse are a crime.”

And so is ignoring a medically documented need for safety.
This letter doesn’t ask for sympathy.
It demands legal and ethical conduct — with the evidence attached.


No comments:

If You Want Peace, Don’t Weaponise Airbnb and Bad Manners

 🧱 SWANK Dispatch: The Fence, the Eavesdrop, and the Never-Ending Inquiry

🗓️ 13 July 2020

Filed Under: fabricated reports, eavesdropping neighbours, institutional stagnation, asthma risk, privacy violations, homeschool disruption, faux concern, gendered miscommunication

“How long must a woman endure investigation for surviving a neighbour’s tantrum?”
— The Mother Who Was Threatened for Disliking a Fence

Dear Swank Reader,

The 2020 lockdowns gave many a taste of constrained freedom. For some of us, the cage came with inspectors, neighbours who throw tantrums, and a year-long child welfare investigation based on a comment about a wall.

On the 13th of July, 2020, I—Polly Chromatic, still of Palm Grove, still under siege—responded in writing to Ashley Adams-Forbes, whose child had only just been born, while mine had been targeted repeatedly under the pretence of “concern.”

Let us examine what social services in Providenciales found so shocking:
• That I dislike being surveilled by neighbours
• That I object to assault and verbal threats in front of my children
• That I homeschool and compost
• That I requested Covid precautions due to eosinophilic asthma

Apparently, all of this warranted ongoing scrutiny. Meanwhile, the neighbour who ripped down my sign, threatened violence, and made up false vaccination reports was free to continue with Airbnb hosting and public slander.

🚩 I. The Complaint Was the Consequence of Her Own Eavesdropping

She overheard me speaking with my mother about vaccine schedules and invented an entire safeguarding narrative.

What’s more interesting is that the only complaints ever come from her — only when she’s in residence. Her transitory guests were more polite, respectful, and communicative than she ever was.

💡 II. Social Work, But Make It Sexist

Despite being the children’s primary caregiver, educator, and intellectual guardian, social workers deliberately bypassed me and tried speaking to my husband instead — a man I openly stated is not a good communicator. How is that protective?

This was not miscommunication. It was intentional gendered misdirection.

🦠 III. Disregard for My Medical Safety

In early 2020, amidst the growing global panic, social workers walked onto my property uninvited, despite my clear boundaries and my life-threatening condition. No masks. No caution. Only institutional entitlement.

One year of surveillance. Zero updates. No care for risk. No respect for the routine of a homeschooling mother of four. But they say it’s for protection.

📘 Final Words:

“I’m trying to educate my children and write books,” I said.
What I wanted was peace. What I received was intrusion.
If this is what “support” looks like, I’ll take solitude.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions