“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label safeguarding harassment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safeguarding harassment. Show all posts

If You Can’t Stop Harassing Me, At Least Get Out of the Way.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
I’M TRYING TO WORK. YOU’RE TRYING TO COLLAPSE ME.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Work Obstruction · Housing Harm · Mould Exposure · Sewer Gas Collapse · Disability Disregarded · Institutional Interference · Polite Fury · Email Precision · SWANK Economic Sabotage Log

🛠️ THE WORKING MOTHER YOU CONTINUE TO OBSTRUCT:

“It would be really helpful if I’m not harassed, bullied, and discriminated against by hospitals and social workers so I can work before you cause us to be homeless.”
“We can’t live in mould-infested homes or ones with sewer gas leaks.”
“Seems like me working is a priority or should be to everyone but you’ve done everything to prevent me from working.”
“Everyone here assumes I don’t have anything to do—which I find strange.”

They mistake exhaustion for idleness, and silence for irrelevance.
I am working despite your sabotage—not because of your support.

🧠 FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE DRAGGING ITS FEET IN LOAFERS:

Let’s simplify:

  • I am a working, highly educated mother.

  • I am documented as disabled.

  • I have four children and no access accommodations.

  • I am prevented from working by:

    • Social worker escalation

    • Medical gaslighting

    • Housing danger

    • Administrative ignorance

You haven’t assessed us.
You’ve destabilised us.
And then demanded performance in the aftermath.

🧬 ACCESS NOTICE (STILL REFUSED AS POLICY):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

But instead of access, you issue insinuations.
Instead of solutions, silence.

📎 SWORN FOR THE ARCHIVE:

I am not collapsing because I’m weak.
I am collapsing because you build mazes in front of my survival.

Polly Chromatic
Mother. Professional. Medically ignored. Vocationally sabotaged.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com


No comments:

If You Don’t Respect Written Communication, You Are Not Safeguarding. You’re Stalking.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU’RE NOT “CHECKING IN”—YOU’RE LOOPING.
Also Titled: 

Filed Under: Repeat Referrals, Verbal Coercion, Disregard for Disability, RBKC Redundancy, Court-Evading Safeguarding, NHS Collusion

📎 SUBJECT: Referral from Chelsea & Westminster Hospital

Received by: Samira Issa & Eric Wedge-Bull
Rejected by: Common sense, basic chronology, and every previous reply

“I hope this email is received well.”
— Samira Issa, sending her fourth request for phone or in-person discussion on the same incident already addressed.

You hope it’s received well?

It won’t be.

It’s being received like this:
STOP.

🧾 Recap of Reality:

  • The “incident” occurred on 2 January 2024.

  • Referral already answered.

  • No new event. No new risk.

  • Court has been informed.

  • Mother has legal representation.

And still — here you are, again.

⚖️ The Legal Posture:

This is harassment.
This is institutional stalking.
This is retaliation for formal medical complaints.

Your department is not seeking clarity — you’re seeking control.

📞 What Samira asked:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation would be beneficial…”

🫁 What the mother replied:

“I cannot breathe.”
“I have repeatedly stated that I cannot talk on the phone.”
“Nothing new has happened.”
“You need to contact the court.”
“Do not contact me again.”

And yet — you came back anyway.

✍️ Let Us Be Clear:

WE DO NOT DO “VERBAL CLARITY.”

We do recorded, time-stamped, documented refusal.

If you need information: Read the file.
If you need direction: Speak to the court.
If you need confirmation: Check the date.

❌ There is no unmet need.

❌ There is no safeguarding risk.

❌ There is no consent to verbal engagement.

But there is plenty of written evidence that you keep ignoring boundaries — even while claiming to “safeguard” them.

Noelle Meline
Already referred. Already replied. Already done.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, formal refusal, safeguarding harassment, verbal coercion, written-only mandate, social work stalking, NHS referral loop, Chelsea & Westminster collusion, RBKC incompetence, court avoidance tactics, asthmatic sovereignty

No comments:

Referral Roulette: Social Services’ Favourite Game


⟡ SWANK Rebuttal Dispatch ⟡

When They Call Again for What You've Already Answered
9 February 2024

No Means Documented: A Formal Refusal of Phone Harassment

I. The Referral Loop That Violates Logic and Law

This dispatch concerns a formal reply from Polly Chromatic to Samira Issa of RBKC Children’s Services, following yet another redundant referral—this time made by Chelsea & Westminster Hospital.

The subject?

An incident that:

  • Occurred on 2 January 2024 at St. Thomas’ Hospital

  • Was already reported and discussed

  • Already inflicted documented trauma

“They are referring me for the same incident that I’ve already spoken with you about.”

This is not procedure. This is institutional memory loss weaponised as policy.

II. A Refusal Grounded in Health and Rights

This is not avoidance. It is medical boundary enforcement.

Polly—diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma—makes the legal and clinical position plain:

  • Verbal contact is contraindicated

  • Phone calls exacerbate her condition

  • Repeated contact for the same matter constitutes harassment

“I am concerned about your mental health given that you continue to harass me for the same things over and over…”

This is not safeguarding. This is a fixation masquerading as duty.

III. Legal Action and Documentation

Polly informs Ms. Issa that:

  • She has retained legal representation for a medical negligence claim

  • She intends to pursue legal action for continued safeguarding harassment

  • She has already submitted documentation—three named attachments covering Erik, Eric, and Rebecca

Her concluding instruction?

“Please refrain from contacting me again.”

The tone is not rude. It is final.


© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
The repetition of a question already answered is not concern—it is coercion.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy


No comments:

Documented Obsessions