“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion

Showing posts with label Oxygen Misdiagnosis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oxygen Misdiagnosis. Show all posts

Polly Chromatic v. Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust (Unbreathable Conditions Agreement)


THE CONDUCT AGREEMENT OF MEDICAL ILLITERATES

Metadata

Filed Date: 11 July 2025
Reference Code: SWK-AUD-0711-GSTT-CONDUCTAGREEMENT
PDF Filename: 2024-01-21_Agreement_GSTT_Kalisa_ConductTerms_ResponseToIncidentAllegation.pdf
Summary: A ludicrously inappropriate “conduct agreement” issued by Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust after denying emergency oxygen to a patient experiencing respiratory collapse — and then retaliating when she asked for air.

I. What Happened

On 21 January 2024, Polly Chromatic was issued a formal document from Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, titled an “Acceptance of Responsibilities Agreement.” It was written not in clinical language — but in what can only be described as bureaucratic fantasy prose.

The agreement:

  • Accuses Polly of failing to treat others with respect while she was in respiratory collapse.

  • Requests she “not allow other patients to use foul or racial language.”

  • Suggests she promptly treat life-threatening conditions herself.

  • Forbids her from “abusing UK government services such as Kensington and Chelsea Social Work,” despite being the victim of their abuse.

  • Requires her to “not cause any disturbance” to patients — while she herself was denied care.

In short: a non-medically trained mother, struggling to breathe, was expected to enforce hospital order, protect fellow patients, and obey institutional delusions — all while her oxygen was 44%.

II. Why It’s Absurd

This document reads less like a safeguarding measure and more like an NHS-themed sketch from Yes, Minister, drafted by someone who’s never seen an asthma attack but is quite fond of clipboards. It turns medical failure into behavioural reprimand — shifting blame to the patient to cover for inexcusable neglect.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is the poster child of procedural retaliation.
Instead of acknowledging that Polly was misdiagnosed, denied oxygen, and subsequently attacked by another patient — the Trust deflected with a written behavioural code. A clinical institution weaponised tone policing to avoid accountability for clinical failure.

This agreement is not a boundary — it is a distraction from respiratory collapse. It mischaracterises medical events to manufacture compliance.

IV. SWANK’s Position

Any hospital that confuses respiratory distress with behavioural misconduct, and then writes up the patient instead of checking the oximeter, has no business safeguarding children, families, or its own staff.

We file what others ignore. And this document — this embarrassing institutional note-to-self — is now in the archive.

“I will promptly treat life threatening medical conditions…”
– Guy’s & St Thomas’ to a gasping mother, 2024

(Reminder: that’s your job.)

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Chromatic v NHS Fictionalists: On the Nature of Intoxication, Oxygen, and Procedural Degeneration


THE COLLAPSE OF THRESHOLD

Or, A Courtroom Confronts Its Own Fiction

Metadata

Filed Date: 11 July 2025
Reference Code: SWK-HRG-0711-EPO-STRATEGY
Filename: 2025-07-11_SWANK_HearingStrategy_EPOCollapse.pdf
Summary:
Filed to accompany the mother’s oral hearing appearance on 11 July 2025, this statement formally exposes the falsified medical claim that triggered an unlawful Emergency Protection Order. It requests discharge of the order, return of the children, and removal of named professionals due to proven misconduct and misdiagnosis.

I. What Happened

On 2 November 2023, the Claimant was admitted to St Thomas’ Hospital with a documented oxygen saturation level of 44% — a critical respiratory emergency. Instead of being treated for hypoxia, she was accused of intoxication. This error spiraled through the safeguarding system, resulting in her four children being forcibly removed via an Emergency Protection Order on 23 June 2025.

The Claimant’s formal hearing statement — supported by a bundle of SWANK audits and hospital evidence — demonstrates that there has never been an emergent risk. There has only been an emergent cover-up.

II. What the Statement Establishes

  • The originating claim of intoxication was medically false.

  • All safeguarding interventions relied upon this error.

  • No lawful threshold under s.38(2) of the Children Act 1989 was ever met.

  • Westminster and RBKC failed to correct or verify the hospital’s claim.

  • The Emergency Protection Order is invalid ab initio.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because the Crown must not retain custody built upon fiction. Because a mother with four U.S. citizen children, a 44% oxygen reading, and a paper trail of respiratory collapse should not have to disprove lies to reclaim her family.

Because the safeguarding process has become a rehearsal of reputational harm, and it ends here.

IV. Violations and Failures

  • Article 8 – Right to family life (ECHR)

  • Article 3 – Inhuman or degrading treatment (ECHR)

  • Children Act 1989 – s.38 misuse, s.17 noncompliance

  • Clinical negligence – St Thomas’ Hospital

  • Data and referral abuse – Westminster, RBKC

  • Procedural Retaliation – Following N1 and Judicial Review filings

V. SWANK’s Position

We assert that no lawful order may stand when its only threshold was disproven before the removal occurred.

We assert that the Emergency Protection Order is a judicial error created by institutional fiction and upheld through the bureaucratic embarrassment of admitting it.

We do not appeal for mercy. We demand precision. We require the return of the children — and the end of oversight based on oxygen illiteracy.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments:

Polly Chromatic v Respiratory Science: A Tragedy in Five Admissions


🩺 “OXYGEN? NO THANK YOU.”

The Medical Mismanagement Timeline That Launched a Safeguarding Fiction

⟡ SWANK London Ltd. Evidentiary Archive

Filed Date: 11 July 2025
Reference Code: SWK-AUD-0711-MED-RESPCOLL
Filename: 2025-07-11_Audit_MedicalNeglect_RespiratoryCollapse_Timeline.pdf
Summary: The safeguarding claim didn’t begin with neglect — it began with oxygen deprivation and NHS suspicion theatre.

I. What Happened

Before a single social worker rang the doorbell. Before the police ambush. Before the Emergency Protection Order. There was this: a respiratory collapse, a 44% oxygen reading, and a series of non-treatment events masquerading as clinical concern.

Between November 2023 and April 2024, Polly Chromatic presented to four different hospitals in distress. She was:

  • Not treated for asthma.

  • Misread as intoxicated.

  • Falsely accused of racial aggression by a patient who assaulted her.

  • Questioned about her parenting while unable to breathe.

This is not safeguarding. This is sabotage — committed in latex gloves.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

Let’s be clear:
There was no initial “risk.” There was hypoxia, then hysteria — all of it institutional.

Each event on this timeline shows the system:

  • Failing to understand Eosinophilic Asthma

  • Blaming the patient for her own medical crisis

  • Escalating to Local Authority involvement without a single moment of diagnostic clarity

And yet, this timeline became the foundation for the fiction that this mother was unfit. A fiction that spread through safeguarding teams like the respiratory infections they never treated.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because it is no longer enough to say, “There was no threshold.”
Now we must say: “There was a woman whose oxygen was at 44% and nobody helped her.”

Because the removal of four children didn’t begin with any lawful intervention.
It began with a hospital staff member misreading asthma for intoxication, and every agency thereafter choosing to believe the fiction.

This is not “multi-agency safeguarding.”
This is multi-agency defamation — with prescription pads.

IV. Violations

  • ECHR Article 3: Denial of oxygen is not care. It is cruelty.

  • ECHR Article 8: The safeguarding referral destroyed family life on medically disproven grounds.

  • Children Act 1989: Used not to protect, but to persecute.

  • NHS Constitution: Breached. Repeatedly. And with alarming confidence.

V. SWANK’s Position

Every safeguarding act since November 2023 is poisoned by this origin point.
The Local Authority did not identify a risk — they inherited one that never existed.

And the cost?
A mother’s health. Four children’s home.
All because someone couldn’t read an oximeter.

Filed without deletion.
Logged without revision.
Every breath counted.
Except by the people paid to count them.

Polly Chromatic
Founder, SWANK London Ltd.
www.swanklondon.com

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
No comments: