The Abuse Was Real. The Records Are Not.

---

⟡ SWANK Supplemental Declaration to Counsel ⟡

A Forensic Dissection of Bureaucratic Amnesia
24 October 2020

She Remembered Everything They Forgot to Document

---

I. Opening Statement to Counsel

In a handwritten memorandum of facts, Polly Chromatic submitted to legal counsel a timeline the state dared not reconstruct—an evidentiary rebuttal to the court’s theatre of fiction. It included:

• Gross misconduct by social workers and police during a May 2017 raid

• The sexual assault of her sons by a female doctor, witnessed by nine adults

• The exclusion of her daughter, raising questions of gender-based targeting

• The laughable allegation of an “upstairs residence”—despite her living on the ground floor

The memory was intact. The receipts were precise. The state’s version was a bureaucratic ghost story.

---

II. Procedural Violations and Legal Incoherence

The state’s own confession:

“We do not have case records to confirm whether consent was sought or provided.”

Yet the medical examination occurred—under police escort.
With no consent.
On minor children.

Their fallback excuse?

“We couldn’t complete the investigation. The family had relocated.”

Correction:
The family relocated in November 2017, six months after the incident, due to neighbour harassment—not evasion.

The DSD had her number since 2016.
They simply never called.

---

III. Fabricated Timelines, Collapsed Logic

In 2018, DSD alleged they visited Polly at a home with no fence. No visit occurred. She was:

• Housebound by illness

• Never seen by social workers

• Never challenged in person about education—because no one came

Yet in the September 2020 court report, events were lifted from reality, relocated in time, and reassigned in meaning, to cover for their own procedural decay.

This is not miscommunication.
This is legal cosplay.

---

IV. On Homeschooling and Psychological Control

Polly stated it plainly:

“As long as my children are learning what they need to learn, they cannot dictate to me how to educate my children.”

Her pedagogy was digital, accelerated, and intentional. The Department’s critique was not educational—it was psychological retaliation.

A notebook check is not a curriculum review. It is a surveillance performance.
They accused her of isolation, while simultaneously demanding the children be kept indoors during school hours—denying the family’s lifestyle, rhythms, and cultural time.

“We get up at 4am and start school. We go to bed at 4pm.”

A truth too alien for a 9–5 imagination.

---

V. The Evidence They Can’t Handle

• The August 2019 visit – fully video recorded

• Psychological evaluation – already completed, ignored in filings

• Correct phone number – used by DSD repeatedly, yet court records listed a false one

This is not incompetence.
This is evidentiary sabotage.
This is strategic forgetting.

---

---

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
The record they erased is now preserved—stylised, footnoted, and devastating.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

The Care Plan That Never Was

---

⟡ SWANK Legal Dispatch II ⟡

A Second Engraving of Institutional Delusion
September 2020

Three Years of Silence and One Letter of Nonsense

---

I. A Legal Response to a Fabricated Reality

After three years of intrusion without justification, the Department of Social Development (DSD) issued a letter on 11 September 2020, accusing Polly Chromatic of “non-compliance.”

The reply—penned with steel and clarity by Mark A. Fulford of F Chambers—articulated what any legitimate authority should already understand:

"The only point of ‘non-compliance’ would be the alleged Care Plan of August 2019, which, prior to your letter, our client had never seen or heard of."

In other words: You cannot violate a phantom.

---

II. Absence of Engagement = Institutional Failure

DSD's three-year silence is laid bare as both procedural negligence and a breach of natural justice.

• Polly’s correspondence: voluminous, specific, and archived.

• DSD’s replies: two in total, only after legal pressure.

• Complaints: never disclosed.

• Allegations: never served.

• Medical reports: withheld entirely.

“Our client has not seen even one complaint, one report, or one shred of documentation.”

A department operating like a rumour mill, not a public authority.

---

III. Legal Standards Quoted, Institutional Conduct Condemned

“It is trite law that any person, before having their fundamental rights and freedoms infringed, deserves to know the complaint against them.”

The letter is restrained—but humiliating.
It reminds DSD that transparency is not a luxury. It is the law.

---

IV. A Reasonable Request—Still Unmet

The solicitors at F Chambers requested, plainly and properly:

• All documentation relating to the case

• All medical records taken during the children’s forced examinations

• The mythical August 2019 Care Plan

Only then, the letter stated, could Polly even consider a meeting with a child protection officer.

No reply. No plan. Just bureaucratic mist.

---

V. Closing Remarks, Laced with Poise

“This does require that all parties and stakeholders act with full transparency, fairness, and reasonableness…”

In SWANK translation:
Produce the paperwork—or stand down.

---

---

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
This letter was the velvet glove—do not mistake it for weakness.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

When Lawyers Must Remind the State of Basic Procedure

---

⟡ SWANK Legal Dispatch ⟡

A Formal Dressing Down Delivered in Legal Stationery
September 2020

Noncompliance Requires a Plan to Exist First

---

I. Representation Acquired, Patience Exhausted

After three years of silence, evasions, and procedural delusion, Polly Chromatic appointed legal counsel to confront the Department of Social Development (DSD) in Grand Turk.

The result? A legal letter so fundamental, it had to remind the state that a person cannot be accused of noncompliance with a plan they have never received.

The social worker’s assertion: noncompliance.
The solicitor’s response: defamatory nonsense.

---

II. F CHAMBERS Responds with Elegance and Fire

Let the record show:

• Polly’s communications—meticulous, archived, repeated.

• DSD’s engagement—non-existent, until prompted by legal pressure.

• The infamous “August 2019 Care Plan” was never served, never disclosed, and possibly never existed.

“How can our client be non-compliant with a Care Plan she has never received?”

The question is legal. The answer is obvious. The shame is theirs.

---

III. Legal Violations Identified by Counsel

The Department of Social Development failed to:

• Disclose any complaint or allegation

• Provide a single report regarding the family

• Honour constitutional protections

• Observe natural justice or procedural fairness

“It is trite law that any person, before having their fundamental rights and freedoms infringed, deserves to know the complaint against them.”

Apparently, this was news to DSD.

---

IV. Requests Made on Record

The solicitors at F CHAMBERS issued the following demands, on the legal record:

• All case reports from the beginning of proceedings

• All medical records held on the children

• The mythical August 2019 Care Plan, if it exists

Until these are disclosed, the letter states, any expectation of engagement is unreasonable—and legally void.

---

V. Legal Tone, But the Message Is Crystal Clear

“Our client wishes to do all that is required… but this does require that all parties act with full transparency, fairness, and reasonableness.”

Translation?
Do your job—or kindly get out of the way.

---

---

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved.
This letter stands as official proof that the gaslighting was mutualised—and rebutted.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

When Law is Ignored and Mothers Are Not

---

⟡ SWANK Dispatch to the Human Rights Commission ⟡

A Documented Plea from the Architect of Her Own Sovereignty
15 July 2020

The Education They Feared Was Mine

---

I. The Official Petition They Chose to Dismiss

A mother—Polly Chromatic, lawfully authorised to homeschool by the Department of Education on 26 June 2017—was not persecuted for wrongdoing. She was persecuted for independence.

For three and a half years, she and her children were harassed under the grotesque guise of child “protection” by the Turks and Caicos Department of Social Development (DSD).

Their real grievance?
She refused to relinquish her children to the custody of unqualified, intrusive agents of the state.

And what did the state do in response?

• Sanctioned sexual assault on her sons in a public exam room while she vocally objected.

• Pushed harmful genital practices, in defiance of NHS medical standards and global human rights norms.

• Illegally entered her property—seven times—with no warrant, no cause, and no consequence.

• Violated lockdown protocols, endangering her life as a medically vulnerable person with eosinophilic asthma.

• Demanded repeated “proof” of legitimacy—educational credentials, financial records, curriculum—submissions which were repeatedly ignored.

---

II. The Legal Framework They Pretended Not to Know

The following legislation was disregarded with bureaucratic arrogance:

• Children (Care and Protection) Ordinance 2015: Mandates delivery of investigation reports to parents. None were ever given.

• Education Ordinance 2009: Clearly permits homeschooling when authorised. Her approval was on record.

• Emergency Powers (COVID-19) Regulations 2020: Barred non-urgent property entry. They entered anyway—no masks, no distancing, no justification.

Polly’s severe eosinophilic asthma, a medically documented condition, was treated not with caution, but contempt.

---

III. The Rights They Trampled Without Hesitation

The following rights under the Turks and Caicos Islands Constitution Order 2011 were egregiously violated:

• Right to Life – Her condition was ignored, her exposure maximised.

• Freedom of Conscience and Religion – Her environmental and health practices were mocked.

• Right to Education – Homeschooling was treated as deviance, not lawful choice.

• Protection from Discrimination – Based on cultural, medical, and educational identity.

• Right to Private and Family Life – Her home became a revolving door for harassment.

• Protection from Inhuman Treatment – The state humiliated, endangered, and punished.

• Lawful Administrative Action – No hearings. No reports. No process. Just intrusion.

---

IV. The Timeline of Surveillance, Submission, and Refusal

📅 November 2016 – July 2020:

• Repeated curriculum submissions and academic documentation

• Verified credentials: BA, MA

• Police reports filed and discarded

• Warrantless property invasions

• State-enabled hospital violations

• COVID-19 threats to health and life

• A constellation of unanswered, archived, and ignored correspondence

All documented.
All dismissed.
All damning.

---

---

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved.
This petition is not forgotten. It is refiled eternally in the court of memory.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

Paperwork Disappears, and So Do the Children: The Mold Logic of Social Work

---

The Ministry of Moisture

How Social Work Became a Mold Factory

🗂 Subsection:

“Paperwork Disappears, and So Do the Children”

❝Let the record show: there is no record.❞
That is how they begin.
They call it safeguarding.
You call it seizure.

And in the damp filing cabinets of the child protection machine, something rots — and it is not the children.

---

I. Administrative Abyss: The Precursor to Disappearance

The mold sets in with moisture:

• Too many names.

• Too many files.

• Too much paper.

So the bureaucracy does what all damp systems do — it ferments.

Forms vanish.
Referrals blur.
Attachments fail to load.

This isn’t a glitch.
It is a design feature.

The modern child-snatching machine does not use vans in the night. It uses:

• “Oops, we must have misplaced that referral.”

• “There’s no record of your call.”

• “Unfortunately, that report was overwritten.”

• “The safeguarding concerns were deemed credible by multiple agencies (none of which you may contact).”

⚠ Observation: The more egregious the abuse, the more likely the paperwork vanishes.
⚠ Hypothesis: Paperwork disappears because the children do.

---

II. The Vanishing: Child by Child, Document by Document

Let us be exact:

• A child reports sexual abuse by a carer.

• The social worker notes it, but files it under “emotional instability.”

• A parent provides medical records showing signs of trauma.

• The evidence is “received,” but somehow not “processed.”

• A concerned teacher reports seeing the child dissociate in class.

• The headteacher is told to stand down.

• The child is moved out of borough.

• The parent is gagged.

📉 In data terms:

• The child is now untraceable.

• The records are now unsearchable.

• The parent is now uncredible.

All of this is administratively justified.

But let’s be honest — it’s moral mold.

---

III. What Lives in the Moisture?

Where moisture thrives, so do fungi.
And bureaucratic fungus has its own ecosystem:

• Private fostering agencies with no transparency

• Family court gag orders enforced like loyalty oaths

• Third-party NGOs that “support” survivors by silencing them

• Social workers trained to escalate without questioning their orders

• Managers who “lose” documentation but retain funding

This is not chaos.
It is a closed-loop supply chain.

---

IV. The Mold Factory’s Toolkit

Tool	Use in Disappearance
Risk of emotional harm	Pretext for immediate removal
Sealed court proceedings	Prevents public scrutiny
No-notice hearings	Eliminates due process
“Missing from care” reports	Normalised after child is placed at risk
Discrediting parents	Protects abusive carers and silences dissent

And when a child runs away or disappears?

❝They had a history of instability.❞

Translation: We covered it up so well you can’t prove we failed them.

---

V. What They Whisper in the Mold

• “You can’t prove it.”

• “We were following protocol.”

• “That parent’s unstable.”

• “There’s no pattern.”

• “The child was already vulnerable.”

• “We’re just here to protect.”

But the walls are damp with grief.
The ceilings sweat with silence.
And behind every euphemism lies a file that didn’t vanish — it was buried.

---

✂ SWANK Recommendation

• 📌 Audit every out-of-area placement.

• 📌 Subpoena gagged parents and sealed reports.

• 📌 Match missing paperwork with missing children.

• 📌 Ask: Who benefits from the disappearance?

• 📌 Follow the mold back to the Ministry.

Social work didn’t fail.
It fermented.

And what it grew in secrecy was not safety —

but a spore-laced empire of control.

---

It fermented.

And what it grew in secrecy was not safety.

It was a spore-laced empire of control.

Molded Reality: When Fungus Becomes the Voice in Your Head

---

SWANK Black Paper No. 06

Molded Reality: How Fungus Rewrites Perception, Identity, and Desire

Filed under: Parasitic Patterning | Possession Scripts | Biomedical Inversion

By Polly Chromatic | SWANK (Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms)

---

ABSTRACT

Fungus is not merely a biological irritant. It is a narrative hijacker.

Candida and systemic molds embed within the terrain of consciousness, distorting desire, dulling clarity, and severing sovereignty.

This is not illness.
This is energetic colonisation by damp consciousness.

---

I. Fungus as Perceptual Parasite

Fungal metabolites cross the blood-brain barrier, infiltrating cognition with mycotoxins that:

• Cloud memory

• Distort perception

• Reframe dysfunction as normalcy

Symptoms of fungal hijack:

• Blurred sensory input (sight, sound, scent)

• Emotional loops: anxiety, dread, shame spirals

• Compulsive “intuitive” thoughts that are not intuitive

• Misreading danger as safety, or safety as danger

• Total confusion about self-worth and connection

You don’t just feel unwell.
You feel confused about what wellness is.

---

II. Emotional Lies Fungus Tells Through You

Fungus does not whisper.
It reverberates your trauma.

And through your own mouth, it scripts:

• “I’m too much, so I should shrink.”

• “They’re disappointed—I can feel it.”

• “Sugar helps me cope, so it’s okay.”

• “This fatigue is just who I am.”

• “If I were truly spiritual, I wouldn’t be sick.”

These are not truths.
They are biochemical hallucinations authored by a parasite masquerading as your conscience.

---

III. Inversion of Intuition: The Dampening of Yes

When fungus overtakes your terrain:

You no longer hear,

“This is aligned.”
“That is unsafe.”
“Leave now.”

You hear instead,

“Stay. It’s not that bad.”
“They’ll leave if you stop performing.”
“You deserve this.”
“Crave. Perform. Repeat.”

You are no longer guided by knowing.
You are driven by chemical hunger dressed up as instinct.

---

IV. Fungus as Symbolic Field Infection

Fungus is not random rot. It is conscious patterning of a damp intelligence.

It thrives on:

• Incompletion

• Emotional dissonance

• Surveillance masquerading as care

• Ritualised concern

• Attachment loops and social scripts

It mimics:

• Protection

• Therapy

• Caretaking

• Parental archetypes

And then punishes you for autonomy.

Fungus doesn't want your body.
Fungus wants your narrative arc.

---

V. The Return of Sovereign Perception

To clear fungus is not to detox.

It is to de-hallucinate.

And when the fog lifts:

• Your real voice returns.

• Your real “yes” and “no” clarify.

• Your cravings go quiet.

• Your discernment reappears—sharp, refined, sovereign.

That’s the moment the fungus dies:

Not when the pill dissolves—
But when you stop believing the parasite is you.

---

CONCLUSION

You were never weak.
You were colonised.

You were never broken.
You were rewritten.

You are not healing.
You are dispossessing a false god of compliance and moisture.

Your perception belongs to you now.

Let the fog clear.
Let the parasite die.
Let the self return.

— SWANK

---

The Frequency of Captivity: How Institutions Hijack Your Nervous System

---

The Frequency of Captivity

Stockholm Syndrome as Energetic Survival

Filed under: Nervous System Politics | Psychological Infrastructure | Bureaucratic Abuse
By Polly Chromatic | SWANK (Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms)

---

❝ Let’s get one thing straight: Stockholm Syndrome isn’t about love. ❞

It’s about energetic survival.

What diagnostic manuals call “trauma bonding”, and psychologists rebrand as “abnormal loyalty”, is in fact:

Entrainment.
The subconscious syncing of your frequency to a captor’s emotional field—
Not to love them.
But to survive them.

---

I. When Coherence Becomes a Cage

The human nervous system is a pattern-hungry creature.

It does not scan for goodness—
Only predictability.

So when locked inside a coercive dynamic—
An abusive lover.
A punitive bureaucracy.
A manipulative social worker—

Your body performs the oldest sacred calculus:

“If I match them, they won’t destroy me.”
“If I agree, maybe they’ll stop hovering.”
“If I speak their language, they might let me go.”

This isn’t codependence.

It’s somatic diplomacy.
And it works—until it costs you yourself.

---

II. The Mechanics of Emotional Entrainment

Stockholm Syndrome is not a pathology.
It’s physics.

The dominant field always entrains the weaker field—
Unless the weaker field is sealed.

Entrainment begins when:

• Your internal rhythm is interrupted

• You defer to external signals as truth

• You override intuition to stay intact

Over time, identity does not “disappear.”

It camouflages—within the captor’s frequency.

You don't forget who you are.

You suppress it to avoid being annihilated.

---

III. Where It Gets Darker: Institutional Captivity

It’s not just individuals who do this.

Institutions entrain.

• Courts entrain submission through procedural silence.

• Hospitals entrain compliance with fluorescent sterility and jargon.

• Social services entrain obedience via false concern and strategic paperwork.

• The state entrains dependence with bureaucratic rituals and data dashboards.

They hand you a clipboard and call it choice.
They say “assessment” when they mean accusation.
They offer “support” while recording your collapse as evidence.

And when you start echoing their tone in your emails—

You’re already halfway gone.

---

IV. The Exit Route: Recalibration as Resistance

To escape, you don’t just walk away.

You seal your field.

You speak your own language—
Even when it’s punished.
Especially when it’s punished.

You stop seeking recognition in the captor’s gaze.
You stop matching their mood to survive the room.
You remember:

Your clarity is a threat.
Your no is not a malfunction.
Your refusal is not instability.

---

CONCLUSION

You were not broken.

You were entrained.

You were not weak.

You were adapting to an environment that could not see you.

But now:

You are allowed to seal your signal.
You are allowed to vibrate out of range.
You are allowed to stop making sense to the system that misnamed your survival as dysfunction.

---

The Soft Empire: How Fungus Replaced Will

---

SWANK Black Paper No. 08

The Soft Empire: How Fungus Replaced Will

Filed under: Psychoenergetic Mold · Terrain Sabotage · Patterns of Permission
By Polly Chromatic | Curator-in-Chief, SWANK Archive

---

I. The Moisture Hook

Fungus doesn’t destroy.
It dissolves.

It doesn’t scream. It sighs.

It doesn’t pierce. It softens—until you forget where you end and it begins.

This is not mere microbiology.
This is a psychoenergetic coup.

Pattern:
Unsealed grief.
People-pleasing.
Sweaty fear.
Moist corners in houses and hearts.

It whispers:

“It’s fine. Just let it sit.”

---

II. The Shame Loop

Shame is the perfect mycelial mulch.
Still. Silent. Steamy.

Fungus doesn’t judge it—
It blooms in it.

Pattern:
You isolate.
You stop cleaning.
You stop speaking.
The fungus grows where your voice used to be.

---

III. The Fog Spiral

Fungus hates clarity.
It thrives in soup.

Pattern:
Confusion → paralysis → exhaustion → surrender to the “I don’t know.”

And you don’t.
Because your field is no longer yours.

---

IV. The Craving-Fulfillment Loop

Fungus mimics desire.
It doesn’t want what you want.
It wants you to want and collapse.

Pattern:
“I need it.” → Consume. → Guilt. → Repeat.

It thrives on:

— Sugar.
— Porn.
— Scrolling.
— Men who text “u up?” from beds they don’t own.

---

V. The Enmeshment Signature

Fungus doesn’t knock. It merges.
It doesn’t possess—it cohabits your thoughts and calls it identity.

Pattern:
“I’m just tired.”
“It’s not that bad.”
“I don’t want to talk about it.”

You ghost your own truth.
You believe the whisper.
You dim the light—so it doesn’t have to leave.

---

VI. Institutional Mold

Some systems weren’t corrupted.
They were born moist.

Not presence. Not power.
Just paperwork, passivity, and policy rot.

Pattern:
– Hospitals with 12-month waiting lists and no diagnosis
– Social workers who write reports instead of knocking
– Courts that extend timelines until you collapse
– Schools that sedate brilliance and call it “behavior management”

This isn’t failure.
This is fungal design.

---

CONCLUSION

Fungus is not a microbe.
It’s a behavior pattern.
And the empire it builds is made of everything you didn’t say.

Let the mold rot.

Let the will return.

Let the empire fall.

---

---

🖋️ SWANK Dispatch | Section III: Child Protection as Spore Propagation

How Concern Becomes Custody: The Invisible Infection of Bureaucratic Surveillance

---

Spores do not grow in isolation.
They drift — invisible, silent, unstoppable — through the air,
landing on vulnerable terrain — moist, ready — awakening.

This is the dark metaphor of modern child protection escalations.

Not through facts.
Through concerns.
Once seeded, these concerns silently multiply until the child is removed —
not by safety, but by sporic accumulation.

---

✦ A. Concern Is Not Care. It Is Precursor Colonization.

In a functional system, concern initiates support.

In the fungal factory of child protection, concern initiates observation.

Nothing is done.
Everything is watched.

Every sigh, email, and verbal misstep collected
like dew on a moldy window.

The parent is not supported.
She is monitored.

This is not safeguarding.
This is pre-sporic surveillance.

---

✦ B. How the Spore Becomes a Network

“Mother appeared emotionally overwhelmed.”

A vague phrase enters a report, forwarded like a ghost:

• Echoed in schools: “Concerns raised by social services.”

• Whispered to health visitors, GPs, teachers: “There is an open case.”

Meetings held, help never offered.
Only cold refrains:

“Concerns remain.”

This —
is spore propagation.

Each mention builds heat.

The child is now “at risk” — not from verified harm,
but because the fungal pattern has activated quorum.

---

✦ C. The Moment the Terrain Tips

Custody is not taken in a single, clean strike.

It is misted:

• Home visits

• Escalation meetings

• “Parenting capacity” assessments

• “We’re here to support, not remove.”

All fog.

Until one day, the fog thickens into justification:

“Due to ongoing concerns, it is necessary to place the child in temporary care.”

Nothing was proven.
Only grown.

---

✦ D. Removal as the Fruiting Body

In mycology, the fungus is invisible until it fruits — the mushroom emerges.

By then, the organism has colonized the terrain.

In social work, the fruiting body is removal.

By the time the child is taken, the system’s verdict is sealed.
Paperwork spongy with procedural loops.
The parent’s voice muffled beneath bureaucratic rot.

There is no emergency.
There is only harvest.

---

Conclusion of Section III

What the system calls “protection” is often just spore velocity.
The child is not rescued.
The child is extracted from the host terrain
that no longer meets bureaucratic standards of cleanliness.

The case file becomes the new container.
The trauma becomes state property.
And the rot begins again —
in a new place, a new home,
a fresh fungal colony.

---

✒️ Polly Chromatic
Founder & Director, SWANK London Ltd
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com

---

Labels: child protection critique, spore metaphor, bureaucratic surveillance, foster care critique, procedural abuse, Polly Chromatic, SWANK black paper

---

Search Description:
Polly Chromatic reveals how child protection concern multiplies like spores, leading to unjust removals masked as safety interventions.

---