Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): NHS retaliation

Showing posts with label NHS retaliation. Show all posts

I WILL NOT SPEAK. I CANNOT BREATHE. LEAVE US ALONE.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

Hire Your Own Lawyer. Mine Is Already Working.

Filed Under: Disability Disregard, Repeat Referral Loops, NHS Retaliation, Verbal Coercion Refused, Medical Negligence, Legal Warning Delivered

📎 SUBJECT: Chelsea & Westminster Referral Resurfaces… Again

Social Work Participants:
– Samira Issa (verbal evangelist)
– Eric Wedge-Bull (silent but complicit)

Target: A chronically ill mother with four children, a legal team, and no time for this nonsense.

“I’m sick. I can’t breathe well. I will not speak out loud.”
“Not sure what you can’t understand.”
“So do not ask me to speak when I can’t breathe.”
“Leave us alone.”

This is not a refusal.

This is a life-preserving boundary.

🧠 Let’s Simplify:

The incident was 2 January 2024.
The response was given.
The boundaries were stated.
The lawyer was hired.

And still—Samira asks:

“Would you be able to meet in person?”

This is bureaucratic masochism.
A compulsion to escalate where no escalation is warranted.

🩺 THE MEDICAL POSITION:

Severe asthma
PTSD
Muscle tension dysphonia
Inability to speak during episodes
Documented legal request for written-only contact

Your insistence on a verbal conversation is not just negligent.
It’s aggressively unlawful.

📣 THE LEGAL STATUS:

Formal legal action for medical negligence
Pending claim for harassment and discrimination
Every referral filed under “retaliatory safeguarding theatre”
Every email filed under “evidence of misconduct”

🛑 BOTTOM LINE:

No, Samira.
No, Eric.
No, RBKC.

You will not receive a conversation.
You will receive court documents.

Noelle Meline
Diagnosed, Documented, Defended.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, SWANK legal file, written-only mandate, verbal coercion ignored, safeguarding abuse, RBKC harassment, Chelsea & Westminster retaliation, medically silenced, sovereign motherhood, no consent given, escalation pending

I Was Still in Respiratory Crisis When the Safeguarding Referral Began

🩺 SWANK Dispatch: I Asked for Oxygen. They Asked About My Children.

🗓️ 14 February 2024

Filed Under: asthma crisis ignored, safeguarding deflection, NHS retaliation, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital misconduct, medical records missing, predatory referral culture, breathless interrogation, parenting misused, legal evidence submitted

“I said I couldn’t breathe.
She said ‘You can.’
Then she said she’d call the police.”
— A Mother Who Went for Oxygen and Got Interrogated Instead

This letter, addressed to Samira Issa at RBKC Family Services, documents the harrowing experience of Polly Chromatic on 4 February 2024, during an asthma emergency at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.

She submitted this report to protect herself against another false safeguarding referral, and included:

A full audio recording of the visit (linked: YouTube Evidence)
Detailed peak flow meter values, including a drop as low as 112.8
Recorded oxygen saturation of 90%, pulse of 101, and blood pressure of 160/74

🫁 I. What She Documented

Was dropped at the door of the hospital by Uber because she was too weak to cross the street
Nurse refused to touch her medical log, even as she struggled to hold it
Was told, “You can breathe,” despite her visible respiratory distress
Medical records from the night before were missing, requiring a duplicate X-ray
After stating she had four children, a safeguarding trigger was activated

🚨 II. What They Did

Asked about her children’s location while she was still in a medical crisis
Threatened to call police and social services before her second nebuliser was given
Only agreed to treat her after she insisted repeatedly
Prescribed prednisone and discharged her after her insistence
Initiated a false safeguarding referral, linked to the previous visit at St. Thomas’ — even though that visit was also for the same untreated asthma flare-up

🔐 III. SWANK Commentary

The moment you say "children,"
the system stops seeing your lungs.

This is how women with chronic illness are silenced —
through veiled threats disguised as “concern.”
She needed a second nebuliser.
They needed a narrative.

She has one now.

And it’s written down.

You Reported Me to Safeguarding. I Reported You to the Police.

⟡ They Ignored Her Oxygen Levels. So I Escalated to the Police. ⟡
“Your safeguarding concern was noted. So was your failure to treat her.”

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS-MPS/EMAILS-15
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailEscalation_NHSStMarys_HonorMistreatment_PoliceReportIntent.pdf
Escalation email following emergency mistreatment of Heir at St Mary’s Hospital A&E. Forwarded to safeguarding teams with notice of police report and refusal to remain silent.

I. What Happened

On 21 November 2024, shortly after her daughter Heir was dismissed from emergency care despite respiratory distress, the parent:

Forwarded the complaint to Westminster Children’s Services
Included medical context, oxygen data, and details of hostile treatment
Noted that the hospital had escalated a safeguarding concern against her — instead of addressing their own clinical failure
Stated plainly that she would report the incident to police
Reminded all recipients that documented medical neglect was not excused by filing against the parent

The email stood as both evidence and warning: the system may escalate, but so will the archive.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

That Heir’s mistreatment at A&E was witnessed, recorded, and reported immediately
That NHS staff attempted to reframe the incident by filing against the parent
That the parent proactively responded with a clear paper trail, not silence
That Westminster Children’s Services was informed in real-time and could not later claim ignorance
That the escalation to police was not for show — it was for legal accountability

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when your daughter needs help breathing and the hospital staff refuse to act —
and then file a concern about you —
that’s not safeguarding.
That’s cover-up protocol.

Because when you respond with oxygen readings, a timeline, and legal escalation —
you are not “uncooperative.”
You are documenting the scene.

And because when they send in safeguarding,
you send them the truth —
in PDF format.

IV. Violations

NHS Constitution – Duty of Care
Breach of clinical responsibility in emergency paediatric care
Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 3 and 8
Degrading treatment and interference in family life
Children Act 1989 / 2004
Endangerment of a child by systemic inaction
Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)
Valid grounds for police report on clinical misconduct
Equality Act 2010 – Section 27
Retaliatory safeguarding action following assertion of disability rights

V. SWANK’s Position

You didn’t treat her.
You dismissed her.
And then you filed against me.

So now I’ve filed back.
And this time, the police aren’t the only ones who’ll see it.

This wasn’t care.
It was cowardice in uniform.

We didn’t need a report.
We needed oxygen.
Now you’re the ones under review.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.