⟡ Filed While Gasping: The Hospital Assault They Tried to Frame as Mine ⟡
On the institutional audacity of calling the victim a perpetrator while she was too breathless to speak
Filed: 12 July 2025
Reference: SWANK/MPS/STTHOMAS-ASSAULT-20240102
๐ Download PDF – 2024-01-02_PoliceReport_StThomasHospital_VerbalAssault.pdf
Summary: Police report submitted by Polly Chromatic after being verbally abused while gasping for air at St Thomas’ A&E. CCTV confirms she was the victim.
I. What Happened
On the night of 2 January 2024, Polly Chromatic presented to St Thomas’ Hospital in a state of acute respiratory distress. She was dizzy from oxygen deprivation and unable to stand upright. During triage, she accidentally stepped on someone’s foot while attempting to sit.
An unrelated woman — a stranger seated in the back row — launched into loud, targeted verbal abuse. Polly, unable to hear the nurse through the attack, asked the woman to be quiet. Instead, the verbal assault escalated.
Polly filed a police report the very next day:
Verbal abuse, racially motivated targeting, disability-related vulnerability.
She specifically identified that the hospital had CCTV footage confirming the events — including her medical distress, her daughter’s presence, and the abusive behavior of the other woman.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Clear victimisation of a disabled mother in medical crisis
Targeted verbal assault in a hospital setting with no immediate intervention
Racial and disability-based aggression confirmed via self-report and visible footage
Submission of a police report that was subsequently ignored — while Polly was instead referred for psychiatric review
Institutional erasure of a documented assault in favour of redirecting blame onto the patient herself
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because this incident triggered a catastrophic misdiagnosis —
St Thomas’ staff later alleged Polly had attacked someone, weaponising the racist and inaccurate inversion of events to launch a safeguarding escalation that led, months later, to the removal of her children.
This was the origin point.
The moment the truth was inverted.
The beginning of the safeguarding fiction.
What began as a woman reporting an assault became the false basis for criminal suspicion and psychiatric referral — all while the original attacker walked away, unchallenged, unfiled, and unreviewed.
SWANK records this not as an isolated event, but as the first spark in a long trail of procedural retaliation.
IV. Violations
Article 3, ECHR – Protection from degrading treatment
Article 8, ECHR – Right to family and private life
Equality Act 2010 – Disability and race-based discrimination
Police Code of Practice – Failure to investigate a victim’s report in good faith
NHS Duty of Candour – Non-disclosure of incident or follow-up communication
Children Act 1989 (indirectly) – Use of fabricated risk narrative in later proceedings
V. SWANK’s Position
This wasn’t an incident. It was an inversion.
Polly Chromatic walked into A&E struggling to breathe. She left as a fabricated threat — while her actual report was discarded.
This is how false narratives begin.
With one lie, one ignored complaint, and one piece of CCTV footage they refuse to watch.
SWANK will not allow this foundational reversal to be buried.
We will return to it every time the safeguarding myth resurfaces.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.