⟡ When the Kingdom Fails, We File to Geneva ⟡
Filed: 21 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/UN/CRPD-UK-VIOLATIONS
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-21_SWANK_UN_CRPD_ShadowReport_DisabilityRetaliation_HousingNeglect_UKArticles5_7_16_17_19_25_28_31.pdf
I. A Shadow Report from the Mother They Tried to Silence
This report — formally submitted to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) — is not a plea. It is a record of UK state misconduct, structured in sovereign grammar and legal disdain.
It details:
Retaliatory safeguarding threats
Refusal to honour written-only communication adjustments
Medical endangerment during known disability episodes
Chronic housing neglect and obstruction
Data concealment, access obstruction, and gaslighting in policy drag
Each violation is matched to its corresponding Article under the CRPD.
Each abuse is annotated, indexed, and unmissable.
This is not anecdote.
This is evidence — internationally styled.
II. Articles Breached (With Formal Disregard)
The report documents violations of the following CRPD protections:
Article 5 – Equality and Non-Discrimination
Article 7 – Children with Disabilities
Article 16 – Freedom from Exploitation, Violence and Abuse
Article 17 – Protection of the Integrity of the Person
Article 19 – Living Independently and Being Included in the Community
Article 25 – Health
Article 28 – Adequate Standard of Living and Social Protection
Article 31 – Statistics and Data Collection
The UK signed these articles.
It just forgot to obey them.
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because there is no ombudsman powerful enough to stop retaliation once it begins.
Because mothers are not safe when the safeguarding powers serve the state, not the child.
Because this wasn’t local failure — it was coordinated across boroughs, hospitals, and agencies.
Let the record show:
The evidence was compiled
The retaliation was mapped
The silence was rejected
And SWANK — filed it with Geneva, not Westminster
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not believe domestic tribunals can resolve systemic abuse they helped enable.
We do not treat international mechanisms as decoration.
We do not file to the UN for effect.
We file because the law here has ceased to protect the disabled from itself.
Let the record show:
The reports were sent.
The truth was indexed.
The retaliation was named.
And SWANK — went global.
This isn’t a shadow.
It is a spotlight in PDF.