The Adjustment Was Medical. The Record Was Fiction.

---

⟡ SWANK Medical Archive: Asthma Discrimination Ledger ⟡

“I Left for Medical Safety. They Wrote That I Was Removed.”
Filed: 2 January 2024
Reference: SWANK/ST-THOMAS/WRITTEN-BREACH-SECURITY-LIE
📎 Download PDF – 2024-01-02_SWANK_Complaint_StThomas_AsthmaDiscrimination_WrittenOnlyBreach_SecurityFalsehood.pdf

---

I. The Breach Was Clinical. The Lie Was Institutional.

This complaint, filed directly with Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, is not an expression of dismay.
It is a dissection of malpractice, written with the clarity of someone who survived it.

You asked for written-only communication — medically documented, legally valid, and based on respiratory risk.

They ignored it.
You left.
They called it removal.

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• Eosinophilic Asthma and muscle dysphonia make verbal communication medically dangerous

• Written-only adjustments had been:

  • Previously filed

  • Previously ignored

  • Previously used to escalate safeguarding instead of prevent harm

• During this encounter:

  • The adjustment was once again breached

  • You exercised your right to exit for medical safety

  • They recorded it as “removal by security”, weaponising narrative to conceal liability

This was not a misunderstanding.

It was false record creation, filed under the guise of protocol.

---

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this was never about one visit.
It was about a pattern:

• Verbal insistence against clinical recommendation

• Disability as disruption

• Departure as defiance

• And a hospital that prefers to be obeyed, not informed

We filed this because:

• They lied in their record

• They breached your adjustment

• They endangered your life — and then tried to make it look like noncompliance

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept fabricated security narratives.
We do not accept disability framed as instability.
We do not accept clinicians who rewrite their own failures into your file.

Let the record show:

The adjustment was medically justified.
The breach was deliberate.
The hospital lied.
And now — the complaint is public.

This wasn’t removal.
It was survival — reframed by those who caused the harm.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

---

Two Kingdoms, One Complaint: Police Retaliation, Racial Harm & Medical Endangerment (2016–2025)

---

🕯 SWANK London Ltd.

✒️ Dispatch No. 2025-05-18-Intl-Retaliation

Filed Under: Cross-Jurisdictional Misconduct, Racial Trauma, Medical Endangerment, Procedural Sabotage

---

📜 RECORD OF POLICE RETALIATION & MEDICAL ENDANGERMENT

Jurisdictions: United Kingdom · Turks and Caicos Islands (British Overseas Territory)
Finalised: 18 May 2025
Submitted by: Polly Chromatic
Preferred Contact: ✉ Written Communication Only – View Statement

---

I. Executive Summary

This complaint documents a pattern of cross-jurisdictional misconduct, racially motivated inaction, and medical endangerment, spanning from 2016–2025. It includes coordinated procedural retaliation following lawful complaints, disability disclosure, and safeguarding misuse. The incidents occurred under state authority in:

• The United Kingdom

• The Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) — a British Overseas Territory

The submission establishes:

• A failure to protect a disabled parent and her children

• Retaliatory safeguarding escalation

• Obstruction during medical emergencies

• Racial profiling, including uninvestigated allegations of sexual assault

---

II. Turks and Caicos Islands: Institutional Harassment by Design

Involved Bodies:

• Royal Turks and Caicos Islands Police Force

• Ministry of Health and Human Services (MOHHS)

• Department of Social Development (DSD)

📂 Documented Events:

• 2017–2020: Repeated forced entries into family home without warrant or justification; removal of children under false safeguarding pretext

• 2020: Coordinated school and neighbour collusion resulting in unfounded safeguarding interventions

• 2021.07.30–2021.10.19: Institutional retaliation involving MOHHS, the Department of Social Development, and TCI Police

• 2021.10.19: Ambulance access obstructed during emergency; children denied urgent medical care due to false reports

• 2017: Allegation of state-enabled sexual assault of children during exam procedures — never investigated

💥 Harm Caused:

• Racial profiling, surveillance, and social punishment

• Obstruction of emergency medical care

• Documented psychological trauma to children

• Sexual harm under government supervision, followed by institutional silence

---

III. United Kingdom: Procedural Retaliation & Hate Crime Neglect

Involved Bodies:

• Metropolitan Police Service

• Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS)

• Hate Crime Unit

📂 Documented Events:

• 2023–2025: Repeated failure to investigate hate crime reports linked to racialised abuse from ex-partner’s family

• 2024.08.04: Formal hate crime statement submitted — no substantive response

• 2025.05.18: Statement on family-based racial discrimination filed — no confirmation of receipt

• Ongoing police refusal to respect written-only communication;
  unannounced visits and intimidation despite confirmed medical exemption

💥 Harm Caused:

• Racial trauma and systemic neglect

• Erosion of disability adjustments and safe housing

• Procedural harassment masked as “welfare”

• Interference with lawful home education due to state misrepresentation

---

IV. Relief & Remedial Actions Requested

I formally request the following actions be taken:

1. That this record be lodged as a cross-jurisdictional formal complaint, spanning UK and TCI

2. That copies be forwarded to:
   – TCI Commissioner of Police
   – UK Metropolitan Police DPS
   – Hate Crime Unit

3. That this be investigated under applicable statutes:
   – Hate crime
   – Disability discrimination
   – Failure in public duty of care

4. That the report be linked to my ongoing civil proceedings and UN submission currently in progress

---

Submitted by:
Polly Chromatic
London, United Kingdom
✉ director@swanklondon.com
📍 Finalised: 18 May 2025

---

You Ignored the Mould. You Reported the Mother.

---

⟡ The House That Made Us Sick — And the System That Blamed Us ⟡

Filed: 31 December 2023
Reference: SWANK/ELGIN/2023-CHRONOLOGY-DISREPAIR
📎 Download PDF — 2023-12-31_SWANK_ElginCrescent_HousingDisrepair_SafeguardingRetaliation_Chronology.pdf

---

I. This Is Not a Chronology. It Is a Medical Crime Scene Log.

This document details the cascading deterioration of health, housing, and state accountability at Elgin Crescent, where illness was not only ignored — it was converted into suspicion.

What it captures:

• Black mould

• Structural damp

• Children vomiting

• Disability worsening

• And a housing provider that did less than nothing

Until, of course, it wasn’t just inaction — it was retaliation.

---

II. A Timeline of Dignified Decay

This record shows:

• Repairs requested, ignored

• Medical letters submitted, dismissed

• Hospital admissions, reframed as instability

• Disrepair, reframed as neglect

What followed was not a response — it was a safeguarding probe.

The walls were rotting. So they investigated the mother.

---

III. When Housing Becomes a Trigger for Surveillance

Let the chronology show:

• The home was uninhabitable

• The council was warned repeatedly

• The parent complied with every requirement

• And the reward was a multi-agency safeguarding enquiry

No apology. No repairs.
Just an institutional side-eye, formalised in paperwork.

This is not housing failure.
This is public health weaponised as maternal suspicion.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not believe that housing decay exempts councils from liability.
We do not consider safeguarding a valid response to illness.
We do not accept that disabled parents must prove their worth while coughing through fungal walls.

Let the record show:

• Every letter was sent

• Every hazard was logged

• Every refusal was medical

• And every escalation — was theirs

This document is not a complaint. It is an architectural autopsy.

---

---

---

Respiratory Collapse Was the Outcome. Their Procedure Was the Trigger.

---

⟡ They Scheduled a Child Protection Meeting While I Was Hospitalised — Then Denied It Happened ⟡

Filed: 18 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/N1-COMPANION/MED-ENDANGERMENT
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-18_SWANK_CompanionLetter_MedicalEndangerment_StateSafeguarding_RBKC_Westminster_N1Support.pdf

---

I. Respiratory Collapse Was the Outcome. Their Procedure Was the Trigger.

This letter was filed as companion evidence to the N1 claim against RBKC and Westminster, and makes explicit what their correspondence tried to veil:

• That safeguarding threats were timed to coincide with medical crises

• That lawful disability adjustments were ignored on file and then punished in policy

• That being too sick to attend a meeting was reframed as a parenting concern

They didn’t support.
They escalated.
And the archive filed it — word by retaliatory word.

---

II. What They Knew. When They Leveraged It.

This document outlines:

• A pattern of fabricated safeguarding urgency following each hospitalisation

• The exact non-engagement email used to frame absence as “lack of cooperation”

• NHS records evidencing acute symptoms ignored in scheduling and procedure

• The institutional strategy: initiate harm, then penalise the victim for experiencing it

This wasn’t coincidence.
It was administrative choreography with life-threatening effects.

---

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because safeguarding is not a weapon.
Because scheduling meetings during known incapacity is not care — it is strategic erasure.
Because failure to medically adjust isn’t just discrimination — it’s state-sponsored endangerment.

Let the record show:

• The condition was diagnosed

• The policy was manipulated

• The parent was harmed

• And SWANK — filed the pattern, with references and footnotes

This isn’t a letter.
It’s the forensic language of a lawsuit in gestation.

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit health crises to be used as procedural opportunity.
We do not accept safeguarding as cover for institutional backlash.
We do not redact the tactics of those who turned care into surveillance.

Let the record show:

The risk was medical.
The response was bureaucratic.
The collapse was real.
And SWANK — preserved the evidence of systemic causation.

This isn’t parental non-engagement.
It’s institutional entrapment — published in PDF.

---

---

---