⟡ “It’s Not Her. It’s the Ten Years of This.” ⟡
Polly Chromatic Discloses Social Work-Triggered Trauma to NHS and Kirsty Hornal — Forwarded to Legal Counsel Before Safeguarding Escalation
Filed: 13 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-03
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-13_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_NHS_TraumaDisclosure_SocialWorkHistory.pdf
Summary: Early trauma disclosure email detailing ten years of emotional harm from repeated social work involvement. Sent to Kirsty Hornal and NHS, then forwarded to solicitor Laura Savage.
I. What Happened
On 13 February 2025, Polly Chromatic emailed both Philip Reid (NHS) and Kirsty Hornal (WCC) to express the emotional and psychological toll caused by years of routine social work visits. She wrote:
“It’s not Kirsty — it’s just the long trauma of having so many social workers in our lives… I spend so much time crying…”
She described:
Emotional collapse after court dates and social worker visits
Feelings of being turned away after asking for help
A pattern of being emotionally destabilized by procedural reminders
Her wish to keep medical care (Dr Reid) free from institutional interference
That this isn’t about Kirsty as a person, but the system’s legacy of harm
She then forwarded the message to solicitor Laura Savage for legal documentation and advice.
II. What the Record Establishes
• Kirsty Hornal and NHS received a direct trauma disclosure
• The message predates both the police report and PLO threats
• Polly explicitly separates individual behaviour from institutional harm
• The legal chain of evidence begins here — making this the first trauma-anchored communication in the retaliation chain
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because trauma disclosures aren’t rhetorical. They’re warnings.
Because “It’s not her — it’s the system” is both generous and damning.
Because this email proves they knew. And what came after proves they didn’t care.
SWANK archives every prelude to silence — especially when it was emotionally fluent and institutionally ignored.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that emotional collapse after state contact is incidental.
We do not accept that disclosures are valid only when framed clinically.
We do not accept that acknowledgment is optional after distress is written down.
This wasn’t an outburst. It was trauma intelligence — and SWANK recorded it.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.