⟡ THE ASTHMA ADDENDUM ⟡
Filed: 7 October 2025
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/MEDICAL-NEGLECT
Download PDF: 2025-10-07_Core_C2Application_MedicalNeglectAsthma.pdf
Summary: Urgent C2 application detailing respiratory neglect, missed medical appointments, and risk to four U.S.–U.K. citizen children under Westminster’s supervision.
I. What Happened
A mother with four asthmatic children files an urgent C2 Application before the Central Family Court, seeking medical review, welfare intervention, and a pause on Westminster’s careless rearranging of vulnerable lungs.
The children — Regal, Prerogative, Kingdom, and Heir — each diagnosed with Eosinophilic Asthma, have not received their medications as prescribed.
Prescriptions sit uncollected, peak-flow readings unrecorded, appointments at Hammersmith Hospital unkept, and still, no one in authority breathes a word.
The same institutions that took the children under the banner of protection now seem unable to ensure the most basic physiological necessity: air.
II. What the Document Establishes
• A legally sound C2 filing seeking judicial direction for urgent asthma care oversight.
• Westminster’s dereliction of clinical duty while exercising parental authority under a court order.
• Evidence of neglect through omission — not dramatic, just deadly.
• Activation of the Family Court’s safeguarding duty under Sections 8 and 37 of the Children Act 1989.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because the right to inhale should not depend on a council rota.
Because procedural guardianship without medical literacy is theatre — and asthma does not clap for irony.
Because SWANK’s jurisdiction extends to the cellular level: we record every bureaucratic gasp.
IV. Violations
• Children Act 1989, s.22(3) – Failure to safeguard and promote welfare while in care.
• Human Rights Act 1998, Arts. 2 & 3 – Neglect amounting to inhuman or degrading treatment.
• ECHR, Art. 8 – Interference with family life and health integrity.
• Equality Act 2010, s.20 – Failure to make disability-related adjustments.
V. SWANK’s Position
Breathing should not be a luxury item in Westminster’s care plan.
The Local Authority’s administrative detachment has crossed into the territory of constructive asphyxiation — a negligence so casual it deserves its own policy code.
SWANK London Ltd. supports the Applicant’s motion for urgent clinical review and demands that all future safeguarding be measured not in rhetoric but in respirations.
To fail to treat asthma is to treat a mother’s testimony as expendable.
To document that failure is SWANK’s jurisdictional art.
Filed under the jurisdiction of the Mirror Court — SWANK London Ltd.
A House of Velvet Contempt and Evidentiary Precision.
🪞 We file what others forget.
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer
Formally archived by SWANK London Ltd. and protected under Article 10 ECHR, Section 12 HRA, and Public Interest Disclosure.
Every file timestamped. Every sentence jurisdictional. Every omission recorded.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All textual, legal, and stylistic rights reserved.