“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label family rights breach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family rights breach. Show all posts

How a Mother’s Medical Emergency Became a Pretext for State Intrusion

 🚨 SWANK Dispatch: I Was Nearly Dead — They Called My Kids Orphans and Searched My House

🗓️ 18 October 2021

Filed Under: medical trauma, asthma emergency, unlawful search, child interrogation, disability discrimination, intellectual exploitation, emergency protocol abuse, family rights violation, safeguarding weaponisation, Grand Turk misconduct


“I was in respiratory collapse.
The police arrived asking if I’d eaten.
Then they called my children orphans,
searched my house,
and grilled my 12-year-old
while I was nearly in a coma.”

— A Mother Taken by Ambulance While Her Children Were Traumatised by the State


This formal letter from Polly Chromatic to attorney Mark Fulford outlines a devastating series of human rights violations following a medical emergency on 14–15 October 2021. While Polly was suffering a life-threatening asthma attack, social workers and police used her absence to invade her home, interrogate her children, insult her husband, and threaten family separation.


🧬 I. A Medical Crisis, Not a Crime Scene

  • Noelle, in severe respiratory distress, was taken by ambulance after nebuliser treatments failed

  • Police arrived without masks, asking irrelevant questions about food while she was unable to breathe

  • Children watched in horror as their mother was stretchered away


🧑‍👦 II. What the State Did to Her Family

  • Called her children "orphans" while she was alive and receiving care

  • Referred to the father as unfit, despite his intellectual disability and efforts to cooperate

  • Searched the house without permission, with no adult present

  • Removed children and forced them to ride alone with a social worker without explanation

  • Fed them allergens, worsening their asthma

  • Asked irrelevant, psychological questions like:

    • “Do you bathe?”

    • “Do you like your mom?”

    • “Do you like being homeschooled?”

  • All this while failing to ask if they were okay or offer any reassurance


🚫 III. Abuse of Power Under Medical Pretext

“They forced their way into my hospital room. They violated every boundary. And they tried to turn a crisis into a case.”

The social worker and officers treated the kitchen counter — not the emergency — as the priority.
Rather than assist, they chose to investigate, punish, and traumatise.


⚖️ IV. What Noelle Demands

  • Restraining order against the Department of Social Development

  • Compensation for years of state-inflicted trauma

  • Legal action against both the social worker (Miss Godet) and police (Officer Taylor and others)

  • Public accountability for the violation of medical ethics, legal rights, and child protection principles


SWANK Summary:

She couldn’t breathe.
They couldn’t care.

She was fighting for her life.
They were planning how to punish her for surviving.



Twelve Legal Questions. Zero Legal Answers.

 ⚖️ SWANK Dispatch: When a Lawyer Has to Ask Why Your Children Were Touched

🗓️ 25 August 2020

Filed Under: legal intervention, forced medical exams, investigation without cause, rights breach, family life violation, child protection misconduct, lack of disclosure, systemic harassment, trauma documentation


“Was there a report of abuse? If so, where is it?
If not — then what gave you the right to examine my sons’ genitals?”

— A Mother, Represented and Still Waiting for Answers


This letter from attorney Lara Maroof of James Law Chambers to Ashley Adams, Deputy Director of Social Development, formalises the case that Polly Chromatic has been trying to make for over three years:
That no lawful cause has been given for the intrusion, medical violations, and trauma inflicted upon her and her children.


🧾 I. What This Letter Demands

Twelve direct legal questions, including:

  1. Was any report of suspected abuse ever made in 2017 or 2019?

  2. Was any assessment carried out before police and social worker visits?

  3. On what grounds were her three sons subjected to genital examinations?

  4. Why was no interview conducted with Polly prior to these exams?

  5. Why were the children not spoken to before being touched?

  6. What legal section was used to justify action — or inaction — under the Children (Care and Protection) Ordinance?

  7. What lawful grounds existed for the 26 March 2020 home intrusion during national lockdown?

  8. Is there an active investigation or not?

These are basic statutory questions.
Yet none had ever been answered.
Even after three years.
Even after a lawyer asked in writing.


⚠️ II. What This Reveals

  • There is no record of a proper cause for any investigation

  • The department violated both medical ethics and legal procedure

  • No closure was given. No actions were explained.

  • The result has been chronic, legally sanctioned distress for Noelle and her children

“After three years, it is reasonable to expect your Department would have been able to form a very clear opinion…”
Instead — they formed no opinionno case, and no lawful conclusion.


📌 Final Note:

The letter is from a lawyer.
The trauma is from a government.
The burden is on a mother.
And the silence, still —
is from the State.



Documented Obsessions