⟡ SWANK Supplemental Declaration to Counsel ⟡
A Forensic Dissection of Bureaucratic Amnesia
24 October 2020
She Remembered Everything They Forgot to Document
I. Opening Statement to Counsel
In a handwritten memorandum of facts, Polly Chromatic submitted to legal counsel a timeline the state dared not reconstruct—an evidentiary rebuttal to the court’s theatre of fiction. It included:
Gross misconduct by social workers and police during a May 2017 raid
The sexual assault of her sons by a female doctor, witnessed by nine adults
The exclusion of her daughter, raising questions of gender-based targeting
The laughable allegation of an “upstairs residence”—despite her living on the ground floor
The memory was intact. The receipts were precise. The state’s version was a bureaucratic ghost story.
II. Procedural Violations and Legal Incoherence
The state’s own confession:
“We do not have case records to confirm whether consent was sought or provided.”
Yet the medical examination occurred—under police escort.
With no consent.
On minor children.
Their fallback excuse?
“We couldn’t complete the investigation. The family had relocated.”
Correction:
The family relocated in November 2017, six months after the incident, due to neighbour harassment—not evasion.
The DSD had her number since 2016.
They simply never called.
III. Fabricated Timelines, Collapsed Logic
In 2018, DSD alleged they visited Polly at a home with no fence. No visit occurred. She was:
Housebound by illness
Never seen by social workers
Never challenged in person about education—because no one came
Yet in the September 2020 court report, events were lifted from reality, relocated in time, and reassigned in meaning, to cover for their own procedural decay.
This is not miscommunication.
This is legal cosplay.
IV. On Homeschooling and Psychological Control
Polly stated it plainly:
“As long as my children are learning what they need to learn, they cannot dictate to me how to educate my children.”
Her pedagogy was digital, accelerated, and intentional. The Department’s critique was not educational—it was psychological retaliation.
A notebook check is not a curriculum review. It is a surveillance performance.
They accused her of isolation, while simultaneously demanding the children be kept indoors during school hours—denying the family’s lifestyle, rhythms, and cultural time.
“We get up at 4am and start school. We go to bed at 4pm.”
A truth too alien for a 9–5 imagination.
V. The Evidence They Can’t Handle
The August 2019 visit – fully video recorded
Psychological evaluation – already completed, ignored in filings
Correct phone number – used by DSD repeatedly, yet court records listed a false one
This is not incompetence.
This is evidentiary sabotage.
This is strategic forgetting.
© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
The record they erased is now preserved—stylised, footnoted, and devastating.
Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy