You Sent Me a Meeting Invite Without a Reason

 ⟡ SWANK ICPC Farce Dispatch ⟡

28 February 2024

If There’s a Concern, Why Won’t You Name It?

Labels: ICPC procedural failure, child protection theatre, RBKC communication breach, safeguarding without allegation, SWANK evidence file

—

I. The Setup: A Confidential Letter with No Substance
At 10:05am, Rhiannon Hodgson (RBKC Case Conference Coordinator) emails Noelle Bonneannée an invitation to an Initial Child Protection Conference regarding:

• Honor Bonneannée

• King Bonneannée

• Prince Bonneannée

• Romeo Bonneannée

Scheduled for Monday 4 March at 10:30am, to be held at Malton Road Hub, W10 5UP.

Accompanied by:

• A generic “Parent’s CPC Form”

• No information on the alleged concern

• A phone number for Samira Issa (already known to ignore written boundaries)

—

II. Noelle’s Response: Refusal, Reworded as Grace

At 10:59am, Noelle responds:

“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children.”
“It would be nice if someone could inform me.”

A masterclass in understatement.
This email says, You are holding a meeting about my children’s welfare and you haven’t said a word about what the concern is. Why?

—

III. The SWANK Conclusion: A Meeting Held to Justify Itself

When institutions convene a “child protection” meeting without cause, clarity, or documentation:

• It’s not protection

• It’s not procedure

• It’s not concern

It’s pretext.

—

Filed under:
ICPC without evidence, safeguarding show trial, failure to disclose allegations, RBKC parental disrespect, SWANK procedural audit

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. If no one will say what the danger is, it’s because the danger is being invented.

You Sent a Conference Invitation Without Stating the Concern

 ⟡ SWANK Conference Exposure Dispatch ⟡

28 February 2024

If You’re So Worried, Why Won’t You Say Why?

Labels: ICPC failure, RBKC safeguarding theatre, unexplained referral, parental rights breach, institutional gaslighting, SWANK procedural audit

—

I. The Email That Embarrasses an Entire Department

At 10:05am on 28 February 2024, Rhiannon Hodgson, Case Conference Coordinator at RBKC, sends a formal ICPC invitation regarding:

• Honor Bonneannée

• King Bonneannée

• Prince Bonneannée

• Romeo Bonneannée

Meeting scheduled for Monday 4 March, 10:30am at Malton Road Hub.
Attached: a Parent’s Conference Preparation Form.
Omitted: Any explanation of the alleged concern.

—

II. Noelle’s Response: A Masterclass in Deadpan Dignity
At 10:59am, Noelle Bonneannée replies from her iPhone:

“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children. It would be nice if someone could inform me.”

This single line flattens the entire safeguarding performance.

—

III. This Is Not Just a Meeting—It’s a Ritual Without Logic

Key facts:

• No allegations have been disclosed

• No new incident has occurred

• No explanation accompanies the invitation

• No transparency has been offered

Noelle is expected to attend a conference about her children’s safety, without ever being told what they’re supposedly unsafe from.

This is child protection as theatre, not ethics.

—

Filed under:
institutional concealment, safeguarding performance, parental gaslighting, child welfare opacity, RBKC process misconduct, SWANK invitation archive

© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. If they won’t say what the danger is, it’s because the danger is them.