“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label SWANK law enforcement archive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SWANK law enforcement archive. Show all posts

The Council Sent a Threat. The Police Received the Evidence.


⟡ SWANK Law Enforcement Submission Archive – Metropolitan Police ⟡
“The Email Was Retaliatory. The Statement Was Submitted. The Evidence Is Now a Police Record.”
Filed: 1 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/MET/KIRSTY-HORNAL-COERCIVE-SUBMISSION-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-01_SWANK_MetPolice_Submission_KirstyHornal_CoerciveEmail_AttachedEvidence.pdf
Author: Polly Chromatic

I. When Email Escalates Into Evidence

This document records the formal submission to the Metropolitan Police of a supplemental harassment statement concerning Kirsty Hornal, safeguarding officer for Westminster City Council.

Included:

  • A witness statement documenting her coercive and retaliatory communication

  • The original email, attached in full

  • A reiterated disability adjustment limiting contact to written-only formats

  • A direct request that the case record be updated, logged, and retained

This wasn’t a follow-up.
It was a procedural conversion — from misconduct to misconduct report, from council oversight to state scrutiny.

II. What the Submission Establishes

  • That the safeguarding email was sent with:

    • Knowledge of a medical communication adjustment

    • No safeguarding trigger or threshold cited

    • Language alluding to court escalation without cause

  • That the parent responded:

    • In writing, with evidence

    • Within lawful boundaries

    • Through the correct policing channel — not just complaint, but submission

Let the record show:
The email was inappropriate.
The response was lawful.
And now — it’s logged in a jurisdiction the Council can’t redact.

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because councils may dismiss complaints — but police records aren’t so easily ignored.
Because disability boundaries breached by state actors must be tracked in both civil and criminal systems.
Because safeguarding power must not be used as a threat, and when it is — the email becomes a PDF with consequences.

We filed this because:

  • Kirsty Hornal used institutional email to pressure a disabled parent

  • The act violated law, policy, and decency

  • And the parent didn’t flinch — she submitted it to the police

Let the record show:

The words were logged.
The harms were named.
The archive is live.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept threats masked as safeguarding.
We do not accept breaches of disability law as mere communication choices.
We do not accept silence when state actors act unlawfully.

Let the record show:

The case was updated.
The officer was named.
And SWANK — gave the evidence structure, jurisdiction, and a file path.

This wasn’t an escalation.
It was the legal system being politely informed that the evidence has arrived.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions