⟡ “You Wanted a Statement. I Gave You a Book Excerpt.” ⟡
A stylised written refusal of further engagement with Westminster Children’s Services and police, submitted not as argument — but as closure. They called it safeguarding. She called it over.
Filed: 9 January 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EXIT-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-01-09_SWANK_Email_Westminster_KirstyHornal_EngagementRefusal_BookExcerptRebuttal.pdf
Formal correspondence issued to Westminster Children’s Services — including Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, and council leadership — announcing withdrawal from all further contact. Instead of explanation, it offers a book excerpt. Stylised. Final. Delivered with silence as signature.
I. What Happened
After over a year of surveillance, mischaracterisation, medical injury, and performative contact attempts, Polly Chromatic issued a final procedural disengagement to Westminster.
This letter:
Declares a complete refusal to engage further with social workers or police
Frames past intrusion as chronic, exhausting, and irreparable
Offers no defence — only detachment
Includes a book excerpt in place of explanation, reducing the institution’s authority to a literary footnote
Refuses to explain, negotiate, or re-open the door
It is not defiance. It is emotional sovereignty, mailed.
II. What the Letter Establishes
That medical and emotional harm has reached a critical threshold
That the parent’s position is not open to dialogue — it is archived
That Westminster’s correspondence now exists for documentation, not resolution
That disability, harassment, and procedural abuse cannot be “managed” with more contact
That the final act of resistance is to stop playing the game
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because bureaucracy thrives on response — and dies in silence. Because not every engagement deserves a rebuttal. And because refusing to fight is not weakness — it’s strategy.
SWANK archived this file because:
It is the last word — before the legal filings begin
It turns the council’s narrative into background noise
It reminds the public that explanation is not owed when trauma is evident
This is the moment Kirsty Hornal stopped being a professional actor — and started being a ghosted intruder.
IV. Violations (Already Documented Elsewhere)
Equality Act 2010 – Repeated disability discrimination led to forced disengagement
Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 8 (family life), Article 3 (degrading treatment)
Children Act 1989 – Emotional harm and procedural misuse
Social Work England Standards – Misconduct now considered closed to correspondence
V. SWANK’s Position
Some institutions deserve full rebuttal. Others deserve the sound of their own paperwork echoing back at them. Westminster’s social work team received silence not because there was nothing to say — but because they had already ignored every word that came before.
SWANK London Ltd. recognises this as a literary disengagement from administrative harm, filed not to reopen communication — but to seal the record.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.