“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label disability advocacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability advocacy. Show all posts

The Abuse Cycle: Explained by the One Forced to Breathe Through It


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“My Lungs Are Not a Policy Debate”

Filed Under: Asthma Ignorance · Verbal Violence · Medical Misrecognition · NHS Gatekeeping · Disability Advocacy · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty,

You received the email.
You read the subject line: “The abuse cycle.”
And still — you requested a meeting. A call.
A verbal medium, knowing full well that my voice is a medical casualty.

“Everyone tries to force me to explain things verbally…
and they also get angry if I try to communicate via email.”

This is not miscommunication.
This is discipline by design.
A coercive loop: pressure the disabled to perform, then punish them for failing to comply.

“When I get sick… the hospital is so ignorant about asthma that they refuse us treatment.”

You provoke the flare.
You deny the care.
You demand verbal grace from a throat clamped by protocol.

So here’s the official workaround — since you thrive on officialdom:

  • A disability advocate to attend, not perform.

  • A GP-issued directive stating what I’ve said a hundred times: Verbal harms me.

  • A verbal ban in all clinical engagements. Not a preference — a protection.

This isn’t a request.
This is a legal wall dressed in velvet syntax.

And yes: your refusal will be archived.
Your escalation will be indexed.
Your silence will be printed.

—

📍 Exhaled Calmly by:
Polly Chromatic
Archival Asthmatic · Sovereign Communicator of Breach Logic
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Loops Broken.


No comments:

Feedback Loop: Harm, Gaslight, Repeat: How Public Services Turn Asthma into Administrative Failure


⟡ “Does Anyone Want My Perspective?” ⟡
*A Written-Only Parent Maps the Entire Abuse Loop — and Offers the Solution No One Requested

Filed: 24 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/EMAIL-11
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-24_SWANK_Email_Westminster_DisabilityAbuseCycle_CommunicationAdjustmentProposal.pdf
Email identifying the repeating abuse cycle caused by verbal contact pressure and asthma dismissal. Offers solutions including GP-backed A&E access and verbal-free protocols.

I. What Happened

On 24 November 2024, Polly Chromatic submitted a clear and emotionally grounded breakdown of the institutional abuse cycle surrounding her and her children. It had two parts:

  1. Verbal contact pressure, which exacerbates her asthma

  2. Medical gaslighting, which results in her and her children being denied care

She wrote:

“Everyone tries to force me to explain things verbally repeatedly, which exacerbates my asthma — and they also get angry if I try to communicate via email.”

Then she asked, plainly:

“Does anyone want my perspective?”

She didn’t stop there. She proposed solutions:

  • A disability advocate for her family

  • A GP-issued letter for A&E

  • Hospital protocols that eliminate the need for verbal speech

II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That verbal contact pressure constitutes disability-based harm

  • That asthma-related A&E dismissal forms a repeatable institutional loop

  • That the refusal to accept written communication creates a system that both triggers illness and blames the response

  • That disabled individuals are left to solve the system’s failure themselves

  • That this email is both diagnosis and remedy — and no one followed up

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because if you need a flowchart to survive public health systems, you’ve already been failed.

This email is both a cry for help and a policy draft. It says: here’s the problem, and here’s what would fix it. And it’s addressed to every tier of authority — GP, solicitor, social worker, and mental health.

SWANK logs it not because it’s emotional, but because it’s surgical.
When institutions refuse to admit the pattern, disabled people must file it themselves.

IV. SWANK’s Position

This wasn’t erratic.
It was cartography.

We do not accept that “asthma” should mean learning to reverse-engineer the NHS.
We do not accept that children must suffer to prove a mother isn’t unstable.
We will document every time someone offered the solution — and the state left it unread.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions