“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Section 47 misuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Section 47 misuse. Show all posts

The Social Worker Opened a High-Level Investigation Based on an Email from a Nurse Who Never Saw Me

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: Section 47 By Email? My Son Was Watching Cartoons.

🗓️ 5 February 2024

Filed Under: false safeguarding referral, hospital retaliation, Section 47 fraud, medical discrimination, asthma crisis ignored, RBKC procedural abuse, cartoon-watching children, health condition weaponised, Westminster A&E, Chelsea and Westminster misconduct

“The nurse didn’t examine me.
She sent an email saying I looked erratic.
The next day, I was under investigation.”
— A Mother of Four Still Recovering From Being Denied Oxygen

This document chronicles the beginning of the Section 47 investigation opened by Samira Issa at RBKC, following an email from a nurse at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. The email falsely stated that Polly Chromatic presented as “possibly intoxicated” and “erratic” — despite:

  • Having documented eosinophilic asthma

  • A known history of communication difficulty during flares

  • Being treated for respiratory crisis, not mental illness

No formal safeguarding referral was submitted through the usual medical protocols.
No in-person assessment by a mental health specialist.
No toxicology.
Just an email.

🏥 I. The Reality of the Hospital Visit

  • Polly arrived with:

    • Oxygen saturation of 90%

    • Blood pressure of 160/74

    • Peak flow between 112–120

  • She could barely hold her phone

  • Her condition was visibly physical — not psychological

  • She repeatedly asked for help breathing, not parenting

And yet, by the next day:

A Section 47 child protection investigation had been launched.
Polly had not even recovered from the asthma flare.

📺 II. Meanwhile, at Home...

  • Her son was watching cartoons

  • The home was peaceful, clean, and calm

  • The children were safe

  • The only trauma introduced was by the investigation itself

📂 III. SWANK Commentary

You opened a Section 47
based on an email.

Not a visit.
Not a referral form.
Not a risk.

And certainly not a truth.


No comments:

Samira’s Mum Spoke for Her. I Spoke for Myself — with Evidence.

 📬 SWANK Dispatch: I Scheduled an Appointment with a Social Worker — She Showed Up with Her Mum

🗓️ 25 February 2024

Filed Under: safeguarding fraud, retaliatory referral, hospital cover-up, verbal silence as misconduct, social worker incompetence, Section 47 abuse, systemic cruelty, institutional escalation, RBKC gaslighting

“She said she’d come with a colleague.
She brought her mum.”
— A Sick Mother Who Had Already Filed a Hospital Complaint

On 4 February 2024, Polly Chromatic was hospitalised with eosinophilic asthma. Instead of medical care, she received suspicion: hospital staff — failing to understand her condition — filed a false safeguarding referral alleging erratic behaviour and possible intoxication.

What followed was a bureaucratic theatre of errors orchestrated by Samira Issa, a social worker at RBKC Family Services.

Despite:

  • Already being familiar with Polly’s case

  • Knowing the referral was medically misinformed

  • Being told Polly could not speak due to asthma

  • Being clearly informed of ongoing complaints and legal action

Samira opened a Section 47 enquiry — escalating the matter from suspicion to “investigation” — under false pretences.

👀 What Actually Happened

  • Samira confirmed in writing she’d be attending the visit with a colleague

  • Instead, she arrived with an unnamed woman, who turned out to be her mother

  • Samira did not speak during the visit

  • Her mother conducted the entire visit, questioning Polly’s children about homeschooling — not about the hospital referral

  • No ID, no procedural documents, no reference to the actual concern

📂 What Noelle Documented

  • Email proof of Samira lying about attending with a professional colleague

  • Full correspondence with timestamps confirming harassment and disregard for medical condition

  • Video evidence of the unprofessional home visit:

  • Audio evidence of the hospital misconduct that triggered it all:

⚖️ Why This Matters

  • Section 47 powers are serious: they’re used when a child is at risk of significant harm

  • Invoking one without cause — especially when retaliation is involved — is procedural abuse

  • Bringing a family member to a safeguarding visit instead of a registered social worker violates every standard of professional conduct

🧾 SWANK Commentary

You were told I couldn’t speak.
You were told I was filing complaints.
You were told this was a retaliation case.

So you brought your mother.

And still — not one word from you.


No comments:

Documented Obsessions