“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Disability Impact. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disability Impact. Show all posts

You Were Warned. You Just Chose Not to Act.



⟡ She Filed the Lawsuit. Then She Filed This Email. ⟡
When they said “we weren’t informed,” she published the proof — with timestamps.

Filed: 24 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/MULTI/EMAIL-15
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-24_SWANK_Email_MultiDefendants_N1ClaimNotice_DisabilityImpact.pdf
An email sent to legal firms, council officers, safeguarding leads, and NHS staff — formally notifying all parties of the submitted N1 civil claim while documenting the physical health damage caused by Westminster’s harassment. They cannot now say they didn’t know.


I. What Happened

On 24 February 2025, the parent made it official.
The N1 Claim Form had been submitted.
She emailed every relevant party — Westminster, RBKC, NHS, solicitors, and safeguarding reps.
She attached the form. She logged the health damage.
She named names. She requested clinical escalation.
And then, she filed this letter — not for help, but for record.


II. What the Email Establishes

  • That the N1 legal claim was actively filed and served via formal notice

  • That multiple institutional actors were directly copied, including lawyers and doctors

  • That the retaliatory effects of a social worker visit caused worsened disability symptoms

  • That medical corroboration (via Dr Rafiq) was requested for legal purposes

  • That all parties were on notice — before escalation


III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because lawsuits don’t just start in court — they start in inboxes.
Because “we didn’t know” is the first lie of every institution.
And because if your behaviour is causing medical injury, you don’t deserve plausible deniability.
You deserve publication.


IV. Violations Identified

  • Disability Harassment Resulting in Medical Deterioration

  • Institutional Retaliation After Legal Proceedings Began

  • Failure to Protect a Medically Exempt Parent

  • Cross-Agency Neglect of Procedural and Legal Notifications

  • Ongoing Contact in Violation of Safeguarding Protocol and Litigation Boundaries


V. SWANK’s Position

They were informed.
They were copied.
They were cc’d on the consequences of their own misconduct.
There is no “we didn’t know.”
There is only “you continued anyway.”
This isn’t an email. It’s a subpoena with a send button.


⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

I Filed the Lawsuit and I Couldn’t Breathe — Everyone Got the Email.



⟡ “I Filed My Lawsuit. They Ignored My Lungs.” ⟡

Polly Chromatic Informs Kirsty Hornal, NHS, Legal Counsel, and RBKC of N1 Claim Filing — Links Ongoing Respiratory Harm to Social Work Conduct

Filed: 24 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-10
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-24_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_N1ClaimFiling_DisabilityImpactStatement.pdf
Summary: Email from Polly Chromatic announcing formal N1 lawsuit filing. Sent to Kirsty Hornal, NHS, and legal teams. Cites exacerbated vocal cord injury and asthma from Hornal’s previous visit.


I. What Happened

On 24 February 2025, Polly Chromatic sent a group email to:

  • Kirsty Hornal (Westminster)

  • Laura Savage (Merali Beedle)

  • Simon O’Meara (Blackfords)

  • Gideon Mpalanyi (RBKC)

  • Philip Reid (NHS)

She stated:

“I’m submitting my lawsuit today. Have a nice week.”
“My vocal cords are still extremely exacerbated from Kirsty’s last visit... I can barely talk and also can’t breathe well.”

She attached the N1 Claim Form, making this a formal timestamped filing announcement.

The email was also forwarded to Harley Street Mental Health, requesting delivery to Dr. Rafiq — confirming clinical documentation of harm.


II. What the Record Establishes

• The N1 claim was served and timestamped to all relevant actors on 24 Feb 2025
• A direct health impact (vocal cord damage, asthma exacerbation) from Kirsty’s presence was documented
• This forms part of the disability timeline and adjustment refusal narrative
• NHS staff were made aware that social work visits were causing harm
• No responsive duty of care was triggered — reinforcing deliberate inaction


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because lawsuits don’t begin with papers — they begin with harm.
Because emailing “I can’t breathe” isn’t a metaphor when it follows safeguarding escalation.
Because the harm and the legal filing were in the same sentence — and the system still refused to adjust.

SWANK logs every filing that came with a body count.


IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that social work visits can physically injure disabled claimants.
We do not accept that such injuries are irrelevant when disclosed alongside legal action.
We do not accept that this message was unclear.

This wasn’t a declaration of intent. It was a declaration of injury — and SWANK preserved it.


This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


Documented Obsessions