⟡ “Verified by Velvet” ⟡
The Filing of Truth: A Statement Notarised by the Legitimacy of Ink
Filed: 26 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/TRUTH/0626-A07
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-26_SWANK_StatementOfTruth_FamilyCourtVerification.pdf
1-line summary: Declaration affirming the factual accuracy of the full Family Court bundle submitted by Polly Chromatic.
I. What Happened
As part of the Family Court bundle submitted on 26 June 2025, Polly Chromatic filed a Statement of Truth attesting to the factual accuracy of all accompanying materials and documents. This includes evidence, procedural timelines, and every sworn declaration lodged under Sections A–H.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
Procedural fidelity and legal responsibility
Adherence to statutory verification practices
A sworn rejection of misrepresentation, fiction, or hearsay
Personal accountability at the highest evidentiary standard
III. Why SWANK Logged It
In cases of safeguarding misuse and retaliatory interference, the filing of a Statement of Truth is not merely a legal requirement — it is an act of procedural sovereignty. This declaration reflects the refusal to be mischaracterised or erased. It is the final seal on a living archive of institutional harm.
IV. Violations
Although this filing is a protective act rather than a grievance, it reinforces the court's obligation to:
Recognise verified evidence as privileged
Treat procedural violations as more than minor oversights
Respect the sworn declarations of disabled litigants and parent-carers
V. SWANK’s Position
This isn’t just a tick-box form. It’s the notarisation of memory — signed not in passive compliance, but in visible resistance.
Polly Chromatic has verified every detail filed in her name.
Let no agency pretend otherwise.
Let no court forget.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.