⟡ SWANK ICPC Farce Dispatch ⟡
28 February 2024
If There’s a Concern, Why Won’t You Name It?
Labels: ICPC procedural failure, child protection theatre, RBKC communication breach, safeguarding without allegation, SWANK evidence file
—
I. The Setup: A Confidential Letter with No Substance
At 10:05am, Rhiannon Hodgson (RBKC Case Conference Coordinator) emails Noelle Bonneannée an invitation to an Initial Child Protection Conference regarding:
Honor Bonneannée
King Bonneannée
Prince Bonneannée
Romeo Bonneannée
Scheduled for Monday 4 March at 10:30am, to be held at Malton Road Hub, W10 5UP.
Accompanied by:
A generic “Parent’s CPC Form”
No information on the alleged concern
A phone number for Samira Issa (already known to ignore written boundaries)
—
II. Noelle’s Response: Refusal, Reworded as Grace
At 10:59am, Noelle responds:
“No one has expressed to me why they are worried about my children.”
“It would be nice if someone could inform me.”
A masterclass in understatement.
This email says, You are holding a meeting about my children’s welfare and you haven’t said a word about what the concern is. Why?
—
III. The SWANK Conclusion: A Meeting Held to Justify Itself
When institutions convene a “child protection” meeting without cause, clarity, or documentation:
It’s not protection
It’s not procedure
It’s not concern
It’s pretext.
—
Filed under:
ICPC without evidence, safeguarding show trial, failure to disclose allegations, RBKC parental disrespect, SWANK procedural audit
© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. If no one will say what the danger is, it’s because the danger is being invented.