🪞Who Told Alan?
Or: A Data Breach in Gown and Wig
Filed: 3 August 2025
Reference Code: SWANK–083–MULLEM–DATADECAY
PDF Filename: 2025-08-03_Addendum_PrivacyBreach_AlanMullem_DisclosureObjection.pdf
Summary:
A formal directive issued to the Central Family Court instructing the immediate removal of Alan Mullem from all case correspondence. Mr. Mullem, now a named defendant in an active civil claim and criminal filing, has been improperly receiving private information.
I. What Happened
On Sunday evening, with the dignity of the calendar intact and the fury of the GDPR unsheathed, I sent the following email to eleven addresses at the Central Family Court:
Subject: Immediate Instruction – Cease Disclosure of My Information to Alan Mullem
Time sent: 3 August 2025 at 19:50
From: Polly Chromatic (Litigant in Person)
To: All relevant CFC inboxes, including Orders, Hearings, Public and Private Law teams
CC: Myself, because one must witness one's own elegance
The message was simple — stop sending my personal information to a man I am suing for misconduct.
Alan Mullem is:
A named defendant in my £88M civil claim
The subject of an active private criminal prosecution (LOI)
Not and never has been my solicitor
And yet... documents continued to flow his way. Quietly. Obscenely. Illegally.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
📌 GDPR breach (Article 5, 6, and 32 — data minimisation, lawful processing, and confidentiality)
📌 Article 8 ECHR violation — interference with private and family life
📌 Breach of procedural integrity — listed representative error despite multiple rebuttals
📌 Judicial misconduct risk — if errors persist after formal correction
This isn't just bureaucratic decay. It’s administrative contamination — and it threatens both privacy and the outcome of this case.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because the court has no excuse.
Because the Notice of Acting in Person was filed.
Because the judge received direct bundles.
Because Mr. Mullem is suing material, not serving counsel.
This is not a clerical accident. It is a procedural misrepresentation so egregious it now has its own filename.
IV. Violations
❌ GDPR 2018 – unlawful data disclosure
❌ Children Act 1989 – breach of confidentiality concerning minors
❌ Civil Procedure Rules – misidentification of party representation
❌ Judicial impartiality doctrine – indirect leakage to a known defendant
V. SWANK’s Position
If you are still sending my case materials to a man I have legally accused,
If he still appears as my representative while being sued for retaliation,
If my role as Litigant in Person remains unregistered in your records —
Then your database is not just out of date.
It is compromised.
I file this not to correct you.
I file this so the error itself becomes evidence.
This is no longer about Alan.
It is about the mirror.
⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.