“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label police escalation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police escalation. Show all posts

Disability Ignored, Empathy Denied: A Report from the Respiratory Front Lines

 πŸ—“️ 4 January 2024

SWANK Blog Title: A Birthday, A Breach, and a Breathless System
Labels: asthma emergency, medical neglect, racial projection, safeguarding misuse, police escalation, emotional abuse, child rights, disability discrimination, St Thomas misconduct, COVID diagnosis


A Birthday, A Breach, and a Breathless System

πŸ’¨ Filed under: Respiratory Crisis, Institutional Misconduct, and the Failure of Empathy

On the second of January 2024, I made the rational and collaborative decision with my children to attend A&E—not out of drama, but due to the small matter of my lungs not working. That night, I was wheezing, dizzy, and down ten kilograms from prolonged illness. Heir, my youngest, chose to accompany me.

We arrived at St Thomas’ A&E—or as it appeared that night, a dystopian social experiment in overpopulation and collapse. We were ushered into the Majors waiting area—an architectural simulation of empathy failure. Humans were crammed, strewn, breathing each other’s pathogens at close range. We tried not to step on anyone. We failed.

Despite my clear and documented history of eosinophilic asthma, a nurse—resentful for reasons that remain medically unexplained—suggested I might just be having an “asthma thing.” I politely corrected her. She offered a nebuliser. We sat. Then we were displaced. Then called again. Then told to wait. I stumbled over a foot in the crush of the neglected. For that, I was soon verbally attacked by a woman whose rage was racialised, misdirected, and endorsed by the environment.

And then the accusation came—the eternal bait: abuse. A common technique used by low-quality humans to deflect their own lack of emotional regulation. A nurse took me and Heir into a side room—not to treat my breathing—but to interrogate me about my children.

I could barely speak, but I kept asking for medical treatment. Instead, they sent police to our hotel room.

We left. Heir and I returned to our hotel. I cried. We had only just arrived when officers, again, appeared at the door. For what offence? “Leaving” A&E. Apparently leaving without treatment is now criminal.

They came back. Then more of them. Nine, at one point. One officer said my condition "wouldn’t be fixed in one night anyway"—a remarkable position from someone neither medical nor kind. Eventually, a woman officer told me I would not be arrested. She also told me: "I have no concerns about your children."

It was 4am when the police left.

Then it was my son Prerogative’s birthday.

🎈 We went bowling. We had cake. Balloons. We sang. The hotel staff helped. But amidst the celebration, more messages from social workers. Even after all this. Even when I’d said: not today. Even when I could barely breathe.

So we returned to a different hospital: Chelsea and Westminster. There, they confirmed what anyone with compassion or clinical training should have known days earlier—I had COVID. My lungs needed help. They gave me prednisone. And peace.

But the damage had been done.
By St Thomas.
By the police.
By the social workers who circle like vultures instead of healers.

I changed my number.
I do not want calls.
cannot speak.
I reserve my voice for my children—those who listen.
The rest can learn to write.

This is not a story of bad luck. It is a story of institutional design.
Designed to punish, not protect.
To escalate, not resolve.
To make asking for help feel like betrayal of oneself.

And I won’t betray myself anymore.


Curated for the SWANK Archive by Polly Chromatic
www.swankarchive.com


You Reported Me to Safeguarding. I Reported You to the Police.



⟡ They Ignored Her Oxygen Levels. So I Escalated to the Police. ⟡
“Your safeguarding concern was noted. So was your failure to treat her.”

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/NHS-MPS/EMAILS-15
πŸ“Ž Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailEscalation_NHSStMarys_HonorMistreatment_PoliceReportIntent.pdf
Escalation email following emergency mistreatment of Heir at St Mary’s Hospital A&E. Forwarded to safeguarding teams with notice of police report and refusal to remain silent.


I. What Happened

On 21 November 2024, shortly after her daughter Heir was dismissed from emergency care despite respiratory distress, the parent:

  • Forwarded the complaint to Westminster Children’s Services

  • Included medical context, oxygen data, and details of hostile treatment

  • Noted that the hospital had escalated a safeguarding concern against her — instead of addressing their own clinical failure

  • Stated plainly that she would report the incident to police

  • Reminded all recipients that documented medical neglect was not excused by filing against the parent

The email stood as both evidence and warning: the system may escalate, but so will the archive.


II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Heir’s mistreatment at A&E was witnessed, recorded, and reported immediately

  • That NHS staff attempted to reframe the incident by filing against the parent

  • That the parent proactively responded with a clear paper trail, not silence

  • That Westminster Children’s Services was informed in real-time and could not later claim ignorance

  • That the escalation to police was not for show — it was for legal accountability


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when your daughter needs help breathing and the hospital staff refuse to act —
and then file a concern about you —
that’s not safeguarding.
That’s cover-up protocol.

Because when you respond with oxygen readings, a timeline, and legal escalation —
you are not “uncooperative.”
You are documenting the scene.

And because when they send in safeguarding,
you send them the truth —
in PDF format.


IV. Violations

  • NHS Constitution – Duty of Care
    Breach of clinical responsibility in emergency paediatric care

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 3 and 8
    Degrading treatment and interference in family life

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Endangerment of a child by systemic inaction

  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)
    Valid grounds for police report on clinical misconduct

  • Equality Act 2010 – Section 27
    Retaliatory safeguarding action following assertion of disability rights


V. SWANK’s Position

You didn’t treat her.
You dismissed her.
And then you filed against me.

So now I’ve filed back.
And this time, the police aren’t the only ones who’ll see it.

This wasn’t care.
It was cowardice in uniform.

We didn’t need a report.
We needed oxygen.
Now you’re the ones under review.


This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.


You Asked Me to Speak. I Sent You a Police Report Instead.



⟡ I Won’t Be Explaining Myself Out Loud. I’ll Be Filing Instead. ⟡
“Verbal harm was noted. Written refusal was issued. The police were informed.”

Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAILS-23
πŸ“Ž Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailNotice_WCC_VerbalExemption_AsthmaAggravation_PoliceReportPolicy.pdf
Formal notification to Westminster Children’s Services reaffirming lawful verbal exemption due to disability, documenting medical harm from speech, and confirming police reporting strategy for institutional abuse.


I. What Happened

On 21 November 2024, after repeated attempts by Westminster social workers to coerce verbal explanations during a period of respiratory illness, the parent issued a written notice to:

  • Sarah Newman

  • Kirsty Hornal

  • Fiona Dias-Saxena

The email:

  • Reiterated that verbal explanations had been refused for documented clinical reasons

  • Confirmed that verbal interaction causes harm and constitutes disability discrimination

  • Provided a legal basis for written-only protocol

  • Announced that police reports were being filed to document continued coercion and institutional hostility

This was not a clarification.
It was a legal position.


II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That Westminster was repeatedly notified of the parent’s lawful verbal exemption

  • That social workers continued to pressure her to “explain” herself orally

  • That doing so aggravated asthma symptoms and psychiatric trauma

  • That the parent issued a clear warning that police were being informed of this pattern

  • That this was not miscommunication — it was systemic pressure with foreseeable medical consequences


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when you’re medically unable to speak,
and they demand that you do,
you’re not in a child welfare process — you’re in an interrogation.

Because when you’re punished for complying with your doctor’s orders,
you’re not refusing support —
you’re protecting your lungs.

And because when they keep asking for a conversation,
and you keep giving them documentation —
eventually, you stop replying to them.
And start replying to the court.


IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Section 20 and Section 27
    Failure to accommodate and retaliatory escalation following disability assertion

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 3 and 8
    Inhumane treatment through psychological and physiological aggravation

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Undermining care by targeting a carer’s health during a known crisis

  • Data Protection Act 2018 – Processing Without Consent
    Repeated verbal pressure during a declared communication adjustment


V. SWANK’s Position

You don’t need more explanations.
You need to read what’s already on file.

You don’t need a phone call.
You need a solicitor.

This wasn’t a breakdown in communication.
It was a refusal to honour the one already agreed.

And now, the refusal is mutual —
but ours is archived.



This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Coherence, Alignment, and the Ethics of Output



⟡ When the Hospital Refuses to Treat You and Calls a Social Worker Instead ⟡
“I went to breathe. They sent police. And now I need a psychologist to recover from the psychologist they sabotaged.”

Filed: 30 October 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC-NHS/EMAILS-04
πŸ“Ž Download PDF – 2024-10-30_SWANK_EmailSummary_WCC_MedicalNeglect_SafeguardingRetaliation.pdf
Formal written summary to Westminster staff outlining a one-year pattern of NHS neglect, racialised assumptions, police overreach, and social work retaliation.


I. What Happened

On 30 October 2024, the parent submitted an email to Westminster Children’s Services detailing an unbroken chain of trauma and procedural abuse:

  • Five asthma attacks treated as behavioural issues in A&E

  • Two hospitals that refused care while summoning social services

  • Accusations of abuse during active medical distress

  • A birthday ruined by police in a hotel room while the parent was seeking urgent care

  • Social workers who lied to a treating psychologist, blocking access to mental health support

The email is addressed to Kirsty Hornal. It does not contain legal theory. It contains testimony.

And now it contains a record.


II. What the Complaint Establishes

  • That racial and disability profiling in NHS emergency departments triggered unnecessary safeguarding referrals

  • That the family experienced dual-agency trauma — medical dismissal followed by social work escalation

  • That psychiatric care was actively sabotaged by the institution claiming to be concerned

  • That children were directly harmed by the institutional response to their mother’s health crisis

  • That no institution — not the hospital, nor social services — acted to repair the harm caused


III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because when you go to the hospital to get air, and leave with a social worker — you’re not being assessed.
You’re being profiled.

Because when nine police officers are sent to a hotel on your child’s birthday — it’s not support.
It’s a message.

Because when a psychologist is contacted and misled to stop her from treating you —
You are not under care.
You are under control.

This email is not just a trauma log.
It is an institutional map of harm, sent to the very people who orchestrated it.

And now, it is archived.


IV. Violations

  • Equality Act 2010 – Sections 19 and 20
    Discrimination by association (race), failure to implement medical and psychiatric adjustments

  • Children Act 1989 / 2004
    Harm to children through unjustified intervention and prolonged distress

  • Human Rights Act 1998 – Articles 3, 6, 8, 14
    Degrading treatment; denial of private life, health support, and fair process

  • Data Protection Act 2018 / UK GDPR
    Misuse of personal data to block access to independent psychological care

  • NHS Duty of Care (Common Law + GMC Guidelines)
    Negligence in treatment during respiratory emergency, racialised escalation


V. SWANK’s Position

This was not a safeguarding concern.
It was a multi-agency breakdown engineered through institutional arrogance.

This was not “confusion” between services.
It was discrimination passed between departments like liability hot-potato.

The trauma is cumulative.
The response is performative.
And the archive is permanent.

We said we couldn’t breathe.
You gave us a referral.
We sent you an email.
Now we file it.


This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd.

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.



Documented Obsessions