⟡ SWANK Documentation Dispatch ⟡
28 February 2024
My Qualifications Are Higher Than Your Concerns
Labels: degree submission, social worker evasion, documentation dominance, nonviolent communication, safeguarding manipulation, SWANK archive assertion
—
I. The Credentials That No One Requested—Because They Invalidate the Narrative
On 28 February 2024 at 19:10, Noelle Bonneannée replies to Samira Issa (RBKC) and 23+ institutional contacts, including:
NHS executives (GSTT, RBHT, Chelsea & Westminster)
RBKC senior staff
Westminster children’s services officers
PALS and Complaints teams
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson
She attaches:
🎓 Bachelor’s Degree
🎓 Master’s Degree
And writes:
“I realise that you don’t ask directly for what you need so I will have to try to guess.”
“Please communicate clearly and directly as this leads to the productive conversation that you speak of.”
This is not just documentation. It’s symbolic authority reclamation.
—
II. The Refusal to Explain the Meeting—Again
“You can’t expect me to be capable of deciding if the conversations taking place at the meetings will be appropriate for my children or not, since I still don’t know what your concerns about the safety of my children are in the first place.”
This is the heart of the matter:
They refuse to state a concern, but demand Noelle engage in meetings that may psychologically affect her children.
This is power without disclosure, dressed up as “support.”
—
III. A Snobby Recommendation to End the Exchange
“I recommend that you read the book, Nonviolent Communication by Marshall B. Rosenberg, PhD...”
This is the SWANK touch:
Educating the educator.
Elevating the tone while exposing their deficit in actual communication.
—
Filed under:
evidence preemption, safeguarding manipulation, social worker evasion, academic documentation, SWANK credential dominance, ICPC theatre
© SWANK Archive. All Patterns Reserved. When they won’t ask for proof, it’s because proof ruins the performance.