“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label mapping document abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mapping document abuse. Show all posts

My GP Wrote a Letter. Her Response Was Silence and a Deadline.

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: She Was Told I Needed Aftercare. She Scheduled a Meeting Instead.

🗓️ 29 February 2024

Filed Under: meeting coercion, medical accommodation refusal, social worker escalation, child protection mapping abuse, GP letter ignored, RBKC cruelty, disability rights violated, safeguarding façade, legal correspondence disregarded


“My lawyer told you I was too sick.
My GP sent a letter.
You booked the meeting anyway —
and wouldn’t even explain why.”

— A Disabled Mother Being Railroaded Through Procedure


In this formal communication dated 29 February 2024, Polly Chromatic alerts Samira Issa that both her GP and legal counsel have advised postponing an upcoming child protection meeting. The reason? Polly’s medical condition — documented and ongoing — requires hospital treatment and aftercare.

Rather than postponing or offering written justification, Samira refused to adjust the timeline. No rationale was given. No compassion offered. Only the pressure to complete a mapping document by a looming deadline.


🧾 I. What Was Requested

  • That Samira complete her portion of the Mapping Document first

  • That all meetings be postponed in light of a GP-certified health crisis

  • That, if a delay was refused, written justification be provided for legal escalation and clinical review


🧯 II. What Was Ignored

  • GP medical documentation of urgent hospital and aftercare needs

  • The reality that Polly was not well enough to speak or attend meetings

  • Standard legal and ethical guidance around accommodating a disability under UK Equality Law

  • The very procedural logic of requiring the professional to fill out their form first


⚖️ III. SWANK Commentary

This isn’t just negligence.
It’s deliberate procedural aggression.

You’ve got a GP letter,
a lawyer’s instruction,
a disabled mother —
and still you ask her to perform for a form
you haven’t filled in yourself.

It’s not about the child.
It’s about compliance theatre.



Documented Obsessions