“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Sovereign Parenting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sovereign Parenting. Show all posts

We Don’t Fight in A&E. We Archive the Collapse of Care


๐Ÿ–‹ ๐’ฎ๐’ฒ๐’œ๐’ฉ๐’ฆ Dispatch | 23 November 2024

“Prednisone and Protocols: A Sovereign Medical Update”
Filed Under: Medical Retaliation · Paediatric Neglect · Sovereign Caregiving · NHS Gaslighting · SWANK London Ltd

Dear Kirsty,

You requested an “update.” Here it is—unfiltered, clinically grounded, and maternal in its wrath.

“Rather than go to A&E and have to fight for treatment, I decided to give Prince and King prednisone.”

Not because I wanted to.
Because I had to.
Because your hospitals treat asthma like inconvenience and maternal concern like sedition.

“When I took King to A&E… they told him to breathe with his mouth closed to hide the crackling.”

That’s not triage.
That’s performative malpractice.

“They didn’t put the thermometer in his ear hole.”
“They get defensive and angry if I question it.”

No examination. No listening. Just defensiveness as default.
And accusation as protocol.

๐Ÿ›‘ I Have Lived This. I Will Not Reenact It.

“I will not allow my children to suffer the way they forced me to suffer.”

You think this is escalation?
It’s not. It’s precedent.

I now parent with medical knowledge and legal resolve.
You called it "difficult."
I call it "recorded."

“I will record them. I will report them. I will post it.”

⚖️ Legal Repositioning of Institutional Neglect

“I can’t go to A&E daily with four children and myself just to be ignored.”

You see a busy mother.
I see a pattern of system-facilitated neglect.

“This is child neglect.”
Correct.
But not mine.

“Your NHS staff do not follow protocol. They accuse me. They abuse my children.”

And when the litigation lands, let it be noted:
All of it was avoidable.
None of it undocumented.

๐Ÿ“Filed With Medical Authority, Maternal Precision, and Procedural Memory

Polly Chromatic
Sovereign Medic of the SWANK Household · NHS Accountability Architect
✉ director@swanklondon.com | ๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Treatments Denied Will Be Archived.


No comments:

No Harm Found. Still Under Surveillance.


๐Ÿ–‹️ SWANK Dispatch | June 2024
THEY SAY IT’S A CONCERN. I CALL IT A PATTERN.

Filed Under: Professional Collusion, Mental Health Misuse, Home Education Disrespect, Coercive Bureaucracy, Care Plan Theatre, Resilience Pathologised

At every turn, they revise the narrative.
Not because new harm emerged—
but because no harm ever existed.

Thus the fictional threat transforms into a real weapon:
a fabricated mental health concern, wielded to undermine and outmaneuver a mother with no criminal record, no incidents, and no diagnosis—
only clarity, documentation, and unyielding resistance.

๐ŸŒซ️ THEIR VERSION OF CONCERN:

  • “Mother does not attend therapy.”

  • “Mother is resistant to professionals.”

  • “Mother has a tone.”

  • “Mother refused to consent to... [redacted — no consent was needed].”

Never once:

  • “Mother hits child.”

  • “Mother neglects medical care.”

  • “Mother failed to provide.”

  • “Mother’s children are distressed.”

Because none apply.

๐Ÿ—‚️ REALITY ARCHIVED:

  • Children thriving in daily yoga, AI programming, acting auditions, and ethics seminars.

  • 54 documents submitted.

  • Medical exemptions ignored.

  • Court records falsified and unacknowledged.

  • Requests for risk specificity dismissed with: “we’re worried you don’t understand.”

Translation:
“We cannot explain what we’re doing, but we’re doing it anyway.”

๐Ÿ›‘ CALL IT WHAT IT IS:

  • Involuntary psychological profiling.

  • Systemic coercion masquerading as help.

  • Punishment for medical advocacy.

  • Mislabelled refusal as instability.

  • The only true instability is the institution’s grip on lawful practice.

๐Ÿ”’ FINAL ENTRY:

“Support is not support when you can’t leave.”
“Care is not care when it’s conditional on compliance.”
“Trust cannot be demanded by those who gaslight the truth.”

✒️ Polly Chromatic
Founder & Director, SWANK London Ltd
๐Ÿ“ Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
๐Ÿ“ง director@swanklondon.com
๐ŸŒ www.swanklondon.com

Labels: snobby, false safeguarding, mental health weaponisation, home education dignity, SWANK surveillance resistance, sovereign parenting, professional misconduct, care plan abuse, unsupported support, court manipulation, pattern not protection

No comments:

Documented Obsessions