⟡ N1 Filed. Court Still Silent. ⟡
“I have not received confirmation of receipt, a sealed claim form, or any reference number.”
Filed: 2 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/N1/CNBC-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-02_SWANK_N1Claim_Simlett_v_MultipleDefendants_StatusRequest.pdf
A formal inquiry to the Central London County Court regarding the missing procedural confirmation for Simlett v. Multiple Defendants. The claim was filed. The silence is now filed too.
I. What Happened
On 2 June 2025, Polly Chromatic, litigant and Director of SWANK London Ltd., submitted a written request to the Central London County Court for confirmation of her N1 civil claim, Simlett v. Multiple Defendants.
The claim was filed in early May 2025 and concerns:
Clinical negligence
Disability discrimination
Safeguarding retaliation
Despite the gravity of the case, no sealed claim form, reference number, or acknowledgment had been received.
This letter:
Reasserts the claim’s existence
Demands procedural transparency
Restates her legally protected written-only communication policy
II. What the Filing Establishes
The N1 submission is on record, with date, content, and venue
The court is now formally responsible for the delay
Silence becomes procedural failure, not personal confusion
Accountability begins here — not when the seal arrives, but when the file was first delivered
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because court silence, like institutional silence, is a tactic.
When the claim involves multiple public bodies,
When the allegations include retaliation and medical harm,
And when the court doesn’t respond —
The delay becomes evidence.
This isn’t an update request.
It’s a jurisdictional receipt — signed, dated, and archived.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that claims disappear because courts pause.
We do not accept procedural fog as legal response.
We do not accept the idea that sealed = real, and everything else is provisional.
SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
If the seal hasn’t come,
We still file.
If the court didn’t reply,
We still archive.
And if no reference is issued,
We make one ourselves — and type it in bold.
“Although an initial email acknowledgment was received, no sealed claim form or formal case reference had been issued at the time of this filing. This request documents that procedural gap.”
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.