⟡ THE CATALOGUE OF ERRORS ⟡
A Referenced Index of Institutional Contempt Disguised as Care
Filed: 2 July 2025
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/ADDENDUM-CATALOGUE-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-07-02_Addendum_WestminsterCatalogueOfErrors.pdf
A formal evidentiary addendum cataloguing Westminster's procedural sabotage, safeguarding misuse, and contact obstruction following the 23 June 2025 removal.
I. What Happened
On 23 June 2025, Westminster Children’s Services removed four U.S. citizen children from their family home under a disputed Emergency Protection Order. Since that date, the children have been isolated from all family, friends, belongings, routines, cultural life, and communication channels.
Medical appointments were cancelled. Their iPads and iPhone were withheld. Their asthma care plan disappeared. The letters they wrote to their mother were never delivered. No address was provided for her to write back. Even the food they eat has been changed.
Their joy — once found in skating, reading, bike rides, and shared meals — has been replaced by silence, surveillance, and institutional ambiguity.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
The EPO was executed without transparency, disclosure, or diplomatic consultation.
The children were immediately cut off from every known stabilising anchor in their lives.
All four children have chronic asthma; all four have suffered serious attacks before. Their care plan has not been shared.
Their medical appointments at Hammersmith — the only remaining point of familiarity — were cancelled without notice.
The mother was excluded from all decisions relating to placement, health, and communication.
Contact has been gatekept, delayed, and conditionally offered, in clear violation of safeguarding standards.
Westminster has failed to respond to multiple written requests and complaints.
This is not contact planning. This is emotional embargo.
This is not safeguarding. This is strategic severance.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because no local authority should be allowed to erase a child’s life overnight.
Because skating and laughter are not risk factors.
Because asthma medication is not optional.
SWANK logged this because retaliation masquerading as child protection must be exposed for what it is — a performance of care that relies on silence, severance, and selective paperwork.
This is not the first time Westminster has acted outside law and ethics.
It is simply the first time someone has logged every line of it.
IV. Violations
Children Act 1989 – Sections 10, 17, 22, and 47
Human Rights Act 1998 / ECHR – Articles 3 (inhuman treatment), 6 (fair process), 8 (family life)
Equality Act 2010 – Failure to accommodate PTSD and disability-based communication rights
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child – Violation of family contact, cultural continuity, emotional stability, and medical access
V. SWANK’s Position
This wasn’t child protection. It was clinical abandonment, masked in paperwork.
This wasn’t intervention. It was retribution.
We do not accept the institutional rewriting of safe family life into a risk narrative.
We do not accept the sudden rupture of routine, joy, or medicine.
We do not accept silence as policy.
We document what others dismiss.
And we preserve what they redact.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.