The Adjustment Was Medical. The Record Was Fiction.

---

⟡ SWANK Medical Archive: Asthma Discrimination Ledger ⟡

“I Left for Medical Safety. They Wrote That I Was Removed.”
Filed: 2 January 2024
Reference: SWANK/ST-THOMAS/WRITTEN-BREACH-SECURITY-LIE
📎 Download PDF – 2024-01-02_SWANK_Complaint_StThomas_AsthmaDiscrimination_WrittenOnlyBreach_SecurityFalsehood.pdf

---

I. The Breach Was Clinical. The Lie Was Institutional.

This complaint, filed directly with Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, is not an expression of dismay.
It is a dissection of malpractice, written with the clarity of someone who survived it.

You asked for written-only communication — medically documented, legally valid, and based on respiratory risk.

They ignored it.
You left.
They called it removal.

---

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• Eosinophilic Asthma and muscle dysphonia make verbal communication medically dangerous

• Written-only adjustments had been:

  • Previously filed

  • Previously ignored

  • Previously used to escalate safeguarding instead of prevent harm

• During this encounter:

  • The adjustment was once again breached

  • You exercised your right to exit for medical safety

  • They recorded it as “removal by security”, weaponising narrative to conceal liability

This was not a misunderstanding.

It was false record creation, filed under the guise of protocol.

---

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this was never about one visit.
It was about a pattern:

• Verbal insistence against clinical recommendation

• Disability as disruption

• Departure as defiance

• And a hospital that prefers to be obeyed, not informed

We filed this because:

• They lied in their record

• They breached your adjustment

• They endangered your life — and then tried to make it look like noncompliance

---

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept fabricated security narratives.
We do not accept disability framed as instability.
We do not accept clinicians who rewrite their own failures into your file.

Let the record show:

The adjustment was medically justified.
The breach was deliberate.
The hospital lied.
And now — the complaint is public.

This wasn’t removal.
It was survival — reframed by those who caused the harm.

---

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

---

Your Doubt Is Not My Diagnosis

 🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 21 November 2024

“I Am Not Available for Verbal Abuse, Medical or Otherwise”

Filed Under: A&E Bullying, Nonverbal Refusal, Sovereign Documentation, Medical Gaslighting, SWANK London Ltd

—

“I do not waste my time arguing with people.”

Not in A&E.
Not with staff who confuse concern with control.
Not when talking itself is a medical hazard.

“They either want to help or they don’t.”

Which is why I no longer speak in hope.
I write in evidence.

“If they don’t want to help, I document it online and move on.”

A perfectly modern remedy for institutional rot.
You escalate. I publish.

You deflect. I record.

“I cannot speak verbally to argue or explain things, period.”

Let that punctuation land.

Because every time I enter your hospital, you don’t greet me—
you cross-examine me.

“They don’t believe me. They bully me.”

It is no longer a surprise.
It is a procedure.
And I refuse to play the patient role in your hostile script.

“Talking exacerbates my asthma.”

So no, I will not explain myself.

I will not plead.
I will archive.

“My asthma is much worse now because of that ignorant doctor.”

Then so be it—your disbelief becomes my data.
Your dismissal becomes my next dispatch.

—

📍 Transcribed in Silence. Weaponised in Typeface.
𝒫𝑜𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸, High Archivist of Institutional Harm, Oxygen Sovereign

📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Breathless Moments Documented.

—

Labels: NHS refusal, A&E abuse, asthma exacerbation, verbal hostility, safeguarding failure, medical disbelief, SWANK archive, documented retaliation

—

Search Description:
Mother documents hospital bullying, asthma flare, and refusal to argue verbally. Medical gaslighting called out. NHS staff archived for abuse.

Verbal Explanations Are Not My Medical Obligation

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 21 November 2024

“I’m Not Explaining Myself Verbally Ever Again”
Filed Under: Respiratory Sovereignty · Verbal Violence · Police Reports as Policy · NHS Misconduct · SWANK London Ltd

---

💬 Declared from the Lungs, Not the Lips

Dear Kirsty (and the institutional entourage):

“I will not explain things to anyone verbally anymore.”
That is not defiance. It is clinical instruction.
Because what you call a “conversation,” my airway registers as collapse.

---

📵 Verbal ≠ Safe

“I always get interrupted or the person doesn’t listen.”
That isn’t dialogue. It’s dismissal.

Verbal communication — when weaponised — becomes an arena for:

• Ableist performance demands

• Discrediting the disabled

• Re-traumatisation in real-time

You demand I perform breathlessness for your legitimacy — then penalise me for gasping.

---

🏥 “It’s weird to bully me when I say my daughter can’t breathe.”

It’s not weird.
It’s structural.
It’s the NHS.

Because I documented her asthma —
And you documented me.

---

🚔 “From now on, I make police reports every time.”

Every refusal of care.
Every safeguarding ambush.
Every verbal stunt in fluorescent drag — logged, filed, numbered.

Because what you escalate, I indict.

You make me sick, then punish me for reacting to the sickness you inflicted.
That’s not care. That’s gaslit harm with a badge of office.

---

🫁 “My asthma is worse now — because of that ignorant doctor.”

And therefore:
I will not argue.
I will not explain.
I will record. I will timestamp. I will cite.
Every stolen breath becomes evidence.

---

📍 Filed While Breathing in Defiance
𝒫𝑜𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸, Strategic Non-Speaker, Documentarian of Respiratory Sabotage
✉ director@swanklondon.com | 🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Verbal Demands Declined.

---

Your Debate Is My Airway Obstruction

---

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 23 November 2024

“We Don’t Argue. We Breathe with Precision.”
Filed Under: Respiratory Violence · Verbal Coercion in A&E · Child Protection by Silence · Adjustment Refusal · SWANK London Ltd

---

Dear Kirsty,

“All they want to do is argue.”
And I want to live.

This is not a disagreement.
This is a documented breach of medical protocol—masquerading as “communication.”

When we arrive at A&E, we are not offering persuasion.
We are offering symptoms.
And the response? A combative interrogation.

“We don’t have time or respiratory capacity to do that.”

Not then.
Not ever.
Not again.

“After they abuse us, everyone blames me…”

It is a pattern.

1. Refuse care.

2. Demand justification.

3. Pathologise the victim for failing to perform the dialogue that harms them.

This is not miscommunication. It is deliberate institutional cruelty, enforced by expectation of verbal labour from the breathless.

And Honor?

She will not be sacrificed to the same ritual.

“Apparently other people can talk more easily because they waste it on arguing so often.”

Correct.
We don’t waste oxygen.

We speak like sovereigns.
When we do, it is sacred, strategic, and documented.

“We only talk when it’s meaningful.”

That is not avoidance.
That is clinical clarity.
And if you cannot match that precision, you have no business presiding over breath.

---

📍 Transcribed in Silence. Filed in Defence of Oxygen.

Polly Chromatic
Director of Strategic Silence & Verbal Integrity
✉ director@swanklondon.com | 🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Arguments Declined. All Adjustments Archived.

---

---

The Three Problems You Keep Ignoring (and the One Community We’re Still Building)

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024

“We’re Not Liars. We Just Can’t Breathe.”
Filed Under: Clinical Gaslighting · Asthma Stigma · Verbal Coercion · Medical Torture · Social Rejection · SWANK London Ltd

---

Dear Kirsty,

Let me enumerate—since institutional minds require bullet points to recognise lived experience:

1. The defensive posture of hospital staff.

2. Their refusal to follow respiratory protocol.

3. The insinuation that needing to breathe must be performed, proven, or denied.

You wanted “safeguarding.”
I gave you oxygen.
You asked for history, then punished it mid-sentence.

“Dr Arjumand said: I don’t believe you.”
Several times. With intent.

And just like that: my lungs collapsed.
My recovery reversed.
You took improvement and turned it into procedural injury.

This is not personal grievance.
It is generational. Institutional. Coded into the architecture of disbelief.

I have lived this disbelief in schools, universities, and workplaces.
Now my children inherit it in hospitals.

When they don’t “perform” asthma, they are shamed.
When I advocate, I am framed.

“We don’t want to be social with regular people.”
“We want to be social with other people who have asthma. Very bad asthma like ours.”

That’s not alienation. That’s respiratory refuge.
The world that demands effortless breathing has no place for us.

You call it isolation.
We call it selective inclusion.

“Deaf people have deaf friends. Blind people have blind friends.”

And asthmatics?
We form alliances built on shared air, not shallow pleasantries.
We socialise through oxygen fluency—not forced integration.

I breastfed all four of them hoping they’d escape this fate.
They didn’t. But they gained something else: sovereignty.

So no, we won’t argue for our right to breathe.
We’ll document your disbelief.
And exhale our resistance into the record.

---

📍 Not Broken. Not Lying. Just Done Explaining.
Polly Chromatic
Founding Archivist, Oxygen Sovereignty Collective
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disbeliefs Rejected.

---

Socialising Is Not a Crime—Asthma Is Not a Sin

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 23 November 2024

“We Moved Here to Breathe, Not to Be Blamed for It”
Filed Under: Asthma Stigma · Cultural Displacement · Institutional Suspicion · Social Exclusion · SWANK London Ltd

---

Dear Kirsty,

“We felt isolated in Turks and Caicos and came here because we love the people and socialising…”

We did not arrive in Britain looking for handouts.
We came seeking kinship — in breath, in conversation, in care.

“However, people here don’t like that we have asthma.”

As if a respiratory condition were a social offense.
As if needing air meant forfeiting belonging.

“It’s like you are all angry at us for having asthma. That’s how we feel.”

And in this house, feelings are not anecdotes — they are evidence.
A long data trail of:
– blank stares when we ask for help
– withheld empathy
– and silence when your policies fail us

This is not a cry for inclusion.
It is a record of administrative aversion dressed as neutrality.

“(But we feel better now that you are all helping.)”

Hope. Noted. But qualified.
Because assistance without stability is not care.
It’s crisis management with manners.

If help evaporates at the first boundary, it was never real.

---

📍 Filed on Behalf of All Uninvited From Their Own Lungs
Polly Chromatic
Asthmatic Witness · Displaced Care-Seeker · Misread Visitor
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Rejections Remembered.

---

You Don’t Want Me to Join. You Want Me to Perform.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

“Socialising Was the Dream. Silencing Was the Reality.”

Filed Under: Communication Refusal · Social Exclusion · Email Silencing · Asthma Stigma · Diagnostic Isolation · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty,

This dispatch comes not as a plea for inclusion, but as a coronation of fact.

“We came here because we love the people and socialising…”
“…but people here don’t like that we have asthma.”

Not metaphorically. Not figuratively. Literally.
You are offended by oxygen.

“I can’t speak in person verbally enough to explain all of this…”
“…so I am confused as to how to communicate with anyone if no one wants to read my emails.”

And there it is: the institutional cruelty of verbal gatekeeping.
When the medium becomes the barrier.
When your refusal to accommodate becomes a policy of disappearance.

You say I can’t speak.
You ignore me when I write.
You respond with: “Please don’t include us anymore.”

That is not a boundary.
That is a bureaucratic ghosting protocol dressed as professionalism.

You’ve not declined communication.
You’ve declined accountability—via Outlook.

—

📍 Declined by System. Validated by Archive.
Polly Chromatic, Sovereign of Sovereign Communications, Former Believer in Inclusion
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Attempts Logged. All Silences Noted.

Verbal Disregard, Medical Denial, and the Echo Chamber of No Reply

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“Refusal Is Not a Misunderstanding. It’s a Strategy.”

Filed Under: Adjustment Refusal · A&E Negligence · Hospital Lies · Communication Shutdown · Asthma Mismanagement · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty & Colleagues in Selective Incompetence,

I wrote:

“Your hospitals refuse to treat us when we go to A&E due to ignorance about asthma.”

And I meant it.
They don’t fail to treat — they punish us for presenting.
Their protocol is disbelief. Their attitude is sanctioned negligence.

“You all refuse to provide adjustments when we are compromised verbally.”

This is not a misunderstanding.
It is a coordinated refusal. A tactic. A weapon.
What you call policy, we experience as entrapment.

“I can’t explain my perspective.”
“No one will give me the hospital’s perspective, and I’ve been asking for this for an entire year.”

A year of silence.
A year of being ghosted in writing while suffocated in person.
And what do I get in return?

Lies from St Thomas’.
Lies smoother than breath. Lies with laminated name tags.
Lies told in fonts of faux concern.

This isn’t miscommunication.
It is institutional contempt — cleverly disguised as clinical decorum.

You do not get to call it support when it’s silent, slow, and strategically cruel.

—

📍 Declined. Documented. Disbelieved.
Polly Chromatic
Diagnosed with Asthma, Not Amnesia
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Refusals Filed.

The System That Both Makes You Sick and Refuses to Hear You Explain Why

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“The Abuse Cycle: As Diagnosed by a Disabled Mother”

Filed Under: Communication Abuse · Asthma Ignorance · Hospital Harm · Systemic Loop · Verbal Demands · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty (and Co-Conspirators in the Cycle),

Let me diagram your cruelty in three simple steps:

1. You demand I speak — knowing full well it worsens my condition.

2. I become ill — and the NHS refuses to treat my asthma.

3. The refusal becomes justification for more pressure.

That is not service.
That is abuse.
And it has a name: The Loop.

“Does anyone want my perspective?”

No.
You want compliance theatre. You want performance, not communication.
And when I fail to perform, you diagnose my exhaustion as noncooperation.

So here are my legally-enforceable answers:

• A disability advocate, to protect against further clinical violence

• A GP-issued asthma directive, because the NHS forgets lungs exist

• A written-only protocol, because I refuse to be cross-examined for air

You don’t misunderstand.
You reproduce harm on schedule.

You aren’t uninformed.
You are procedurally hostile by design.

And I am no longer asking for oxygen in your dialect.
I’m filing it.

—

📍 Formally Diagnosed by:
Polly Chromatic
Clinical Witness to State-Orchestrated Oxygen Sabotage
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Loops Logged.

Breathing Is a Right, Not a Request

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 3 December 2024
“You Will All Be Named. You Will All Be Sued.”

Filed Under: Legal Threats · Disability Discrimination · Institutional Hostility · Respiratory Abuse · Witness List Delivered · SWANK London Ltd

—

To Whom It Apparently Still Doesn’t Concern,

“When people become hostile towards me and endanger my health… I will be making police reports and these will be followed by lawsuits.”

That is not an outburst.
It is a legal sequence.

Because when you treat my asthma as inconvenience—
When you ring me knowing I cannot speak—
When you dismiss ten years of medical documentation—
You don’t just neglect me. You harm me.

Let the record show:

• Apple Covent Garden

• Drayton Park Primary School

• Westminster Social Services

• Kensington and Chelsea Social Services

• Westminster Police

• St Thomas’ Hospital

• St Mary’s Hospital

• Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

This is not a grievance.
This is a witness list.
You are named not from rage, but from record.

This isn’t emotional. This is procedural.
And procedure is coming for you.

—

📍 Formally Logging the Breach:
Polly Chromatic
Curator of the Defendant Index
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Perpetrators Documented.

The Education Refusal Was Reasonable. Your Incompetence Was Not.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 10 December 2024
“My Children Will Not Attend an Institution That Breathes Hostility”

Filed Under: Asthma Discrimination · Education Refusal · Legal Rights Ignored · Institutional Gaslighting · Sovereign Parenting · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty,

Let me say it plainly:
My children will never attend your schools.
Because your institutions do not accommodate lungs.
Because breathing should not be a legal argument.

“This is why my children do not attend school… why we avoid A&E… avoid social workers, and police.”

Not because we are defiant, but because we are done.
Done with negligence dressed as authority.
Done with “services” that infect, ignore, and investigate.

This has been ten years of sickness without sanctuary.
A public performance of concern that achieves nothing.

You called it intervention. I call it interruption.
You called it safeguarding. I call it suffocation.
You called it education. I call it persecution in a blazer.

“What a waste of time and resources for all involved.”

Indeed.
If only time and resources were the only things lost.
What we’ve truly lost is trust—and air.

—

📍 Signed by:
Polly Chromatic
Director of Sovereign Education & Anti-Gaslighting Affairs
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Exemptions Reserved.

Apparently, Refusing to Argue Is a Problem When You’re a Disabled Mother With Facts.

---

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 21 November 2024
THE DOCTOR SAID MY OXYGEN METER IS “TRASH.” THEN SHE TRIED TO ARGUE.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Medical Bullying · Verbal Harassment · NHS Abuse · Paediatric Disbelief · Oxygen Meter Gaslighting · SWANK Respiratory Hostility Records

---

To:

Simon O’Meara, Laura Savage
Cc: Kirsty Hornal, Sarah Newman, Fiona Dias-Saxena, Gideon Mpalanyi
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Harley Street Mental Health

---

🥀 SHE DIDN’T WANT EVIDENCE. SHE WANTED DOMINANCE.

“She said my oxygen meter is trash. That Honor is fine. That she doesn’t believe me.”
“She insulted my nebuliser. Repeated that she didn’t believe anything I said.”

You call this a clinical environment?
It was a bullying chamber in scrubs.

---

🗣 I HAD TO SPEAK LOUDLY—NOT IN DEFIANCE, BUT IN DEFENCE.

“She wouldn’t shut up and listen. She kept repeating herself like she wanted me to get angry.”

Loudness is not hostility when used to escape gaslighting.
It’s the volume of self-preservation.

---

⏳ THE WAIT WAS WEAPONISED.

“She kept saying it’s gonna be hours. She kept repeating it like a punishment.”

Delay was not neutral.
It was strategic.
She didn’t treat my daughter—she provoked the mother.

---

🔴 FROM THIS POINT FORWARD: RECORDED. ARCHIVED. SHARED.

“I told her I don’t want to talk anymore. Just treat my daughter.”

If I must bring a USB stick to A&E to get care, so be it.
What I won’t bring is silence.

---

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT, RE-PUBLISHED FOR THE INCOMPETENT:

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Not your curiosity. Not your debate.
This is a clinical adjustment.

---

Polly Chromatic
Defending oxygen with evidence. Recording disbelief with elegance.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com
📧 director@swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Disrespect Archived.

---

Referral Resent. Refusal Reiterated.

---

⟡ SWANK Exhaustion Transcript: The Email Loop Samira Couldn’t Exit ⟡

9–18 February 2024

The Only “Concerning Pattern” Was the Inbox Behaviour of RBKC

---

I. Introduction: A Referral for a Referral Already Referred

RBKC Social Worker Samira Issa initiated repeated contact regarding a hospital referral from Chelsea and Westminster—based on an incident at St. Thomas’ Hospital on 2 January 2024.

This incident had already been acknowledged.
Already discussed.
Already dismissed.

Polly Chromatic’s responses—initially courteous, later exhausted—formed a pattern of lawful refusal. The only pattern missed was the one in Samira’s inbox.

---

II. Highlights from the SWANK Transcript

9 February 2024 | 6:51 AM

“They are referring me for the same incident that I’ve already spoken with you about... I am concerned about your mental health... I have asthma and cannot communicate via phone.”

9 February 2024 | 2:59 PM

“Nothing new has happened and I do not have time.”

9 February 2024 | 3:04 PM

“I am spending time with my kids. I do not want to waste my time with you. Call a lawyer.”

13 February 2024 | Samira responds

Claims it’s a “separate incident.” Suggests another verbal meeting—again.

18 February 2024 | Polly responds

“We will be available at 4pm Wednesday 21st February.”
A brief opening—extended despite institutional exhaustion.

---

III. Email Behaviour as Procedural Misconduct

Across this correspondence:

• Samira claims to have read previous emails

• Then requests the same thing again

• Refers the same incident as if it were new

• Ignores explicit references to asthma-related verbal restrictions

• Ignores repeated use of the word harassment

Meanwhile, Polly had:

✔️ Provided documentation
✔️ Asserted her legal representation
✔️ Declined verbal contact on medical grounds
✔️ Replied in writing—more than once

This is not miscommunication.
It’s a refusal to accept written autonomy.

---

IV. When “We Need to Speak” Becomes Systemic Gaslighting

This was not safeguarding.
It was performative dominance through forced conversation.
It was a refusal to read in order to retain power.

Polly said:

“Please refrain from contacting me again.”

RBKC replied:

“Would you be willing to meet me in person?”

That isn’t misreading.
It’s administrative gaslighting by design.

---

---

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
This isn’t safeguarding—it’s inbox intrusion as institutional ritual.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

Referral Roulette: Social Services’ Favourite Game

---

⟡ SWANK Rebuttal Dispatch ⟡

When They Call Again for What You've Already Answered
9 February 2024

No Means Documented: A Formal Refusal of Phone Harassment

---

I. The Referral Loop That Violates Logic and Law

This dispatch concerns a formal reply from Polly Chromatic to Samira Issa of RBKC Children’s Services, following yet another redundant referral—this time made by Chelsea & Westminster Hospital.

The subject?

An incident that:

• Occurred on 2 January 2024 at St. Thomas’ Hospital

• Was already reported and discussed

• Already inflicted documented trauma

“They are referring me for the same incident that I’ve already spoken with you about.”

This is not procedure. This is institutional memory loss weaponised as policy.

---

II. A Refusal Grounded in Health and Rights

This is not avoidance. It is medical boundary enforcement.

Polly—diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma—makes the legal and clinical position plain:

• Verbal contact is contraindicated

• Phone calls exacerbate her condition

• Repeated contact for the same matter constitutes harassment

“I am concerned about your mental health given that you continue to harass me for the same things over and over…”

This is not safeguarding. This is a fixation masquerading as duty.

---

III. Legal Action and Documentation

Polly informs Ms. Issa that:

• She has retained legal representation for a medical negligence claim

• She intends to pursue legal action for continued safeguarding harassment

• She has already submitted documentation—three named attachments covering Erik, Eric, and Rebecca

Her concluding instruction?

“Please refrain from contacting me again.”

The tone is not rude. It is final.

---

---

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
The repetition of a question already answered is not concern—it is coercion.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

Polly Couldn’t Breathe, So the State Investigated Her Children

---

⟡ SWANK Emergency Report Log ⟡

When Asthma Was Weaponised and Procedure Was Performance
19–20 October 2021

An Ambulance Denied, A Police Report Withheld

---

I. Medical Crisis, Bureaucratic Confusion

On 14 October 2021, Polly Chromatic suffered a life-threatening asthma attack in her home in Grand Turk.

911 did not respond.
An ambulance was not dispatched.

It was her mother and neighbour, Deborah Viera, who contacted Providenciales Police in desperation. Only then was an ambulance secured.

As Polly was taken to hospital in respiratory distress, the police entered her home—without warrant, cause, or medical training.
They inspected her kitchen.
They called social workers.

The stated reason?

“She left her children alone.”
Her eldest was 12 years old.

---

II. Legal Request Denied. Procedure Improvised.

Polly attempted, repeatedly, to obtain the police report. The response?

• She was given the wrong email address—twice.

• She was told she could not access the report because she “didn’t make the report.”

• She was told to return in person—while still recovering from hospitalisation.

At the station, an unnamed officer (believed to be Mr. Porter):

• Refused to give the report

• Claimed it was illegal for a 12-year-old to supervise siblings “for any time”

• Cited no law, no policy, no authority

• Interrupted her repeatedly

• Asked her to leave when she persisted in seeking legal clarity

“No one seems to be able to point out any laws to back up their actions.”

---

III. From Health Emergency to Character Assassination

The entire institutional response was not medical—it was performative safeguarding theatre.

• The home was searched not for safety—but for character evidence.

• The appearance of the mother was scrutinised.

• Social workers were contacted without lawful trigger.

• The vulnerable adult in crisis was treated as a suspect, not a patient.

What began as an emergency became an excuse for bureaucratic harassment.

---

IV. The Neighbours Turn Unstable

The very neighbour who helped coordinate emergency services, Deborah Viera, turned inexplicably hostile. Her daughter called in a rage.

Polly and her family were accused of “harassment”—for requesting the report that Viera had helped initiate.

“No one intended on making a police report. Everyone just wanted to get an ambulance to me.”

In truth, no one wanted accountability.
Not the police. Not the neighbours. Not the bureaucrats playing protector.

---

---

© SWANK London Ltd. All Patterns Reserved.
This was not “protection.” This was the policing of survival.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy

---

The Social Worker Opened a High-Level Investigation Based on an Email from a Nurse Who Never Saw Me

 📎 SWANK Dispatch: Section 47 By Email? My Son Was Watching Cartoons.

🗓️ 5 February 2024

Filed Under: false safeguarding referral, hospital retaliation, Section 47 fraud, medical discrimination, asthma crisis ignored, RBKC procedural abuse, cartoon-watching children, health condition weaponised, Westminster A&E, Chelsea and Westminster misconduct

---

“The nurse didn’t examine me.
She sent an email saying I looked erratic.
The next day, I was under investigation.”
— A Mother of Four Still Recovering From Being Denied Oxygen

---

This document chronicles the beginning of the Section 47 investigation opened by Samira Issa at RBKC, following an email from a nurse at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. The email falsely stated that Polly Chromatic presented as “possibly intoxicated” and “erratic” — despite:

• Having documented eosinophilic asthma

• A known history of communication difficulty during flares

• Being treated for respiratory crisis, not mental illness

No formal safeguarding referral was submitted through the usual medical protocols.
No in-person assessment by a mental health specialist.
No toxicology.
Just an email.

---

🏥 I. The Reality of the Hospital Visit

• Polly arrived with:

  • Oxygen saturation of 90%

  • Blood pressure of 160/74

  • Peak flow between 112–120

• She could barely hold her phone

• Her condition was visibly physical — not psychological

• She repeatedly asked for help breathing, not parenting

And yet, by the next day:

A Section 47 child protection investigation had been launched.
Polly had not even recovered from the asthma flare.

---

📺 II. Meanwhile, at Home...

• Her son was watching cartoons

• The home was peaceful, clean, and calm

• The children were safe

• The only trauma introduced was by the investigation itself

---

📂 III. SWANK Commentary

You opened a Section 47
based on an email.

Not a visit.
Not a referral form.
Not a risk.

And certainly not a truth.

---

I’m High Risk, Not High Drama — Leave Me Alone So I Can Breathe

 📮 SWANK Dispatch: My Asthma Is Not a Crime — But Your Harassment Might Be

🗓️ 30 June 2020

Filed Under: asthma discrimination, shielding violation, health harassment, false accusations, community hostility, pandemic vulnerability, NHS guidance ignored, public health failure, legal retaliation

---

“My diagnosis is severe eosinophilic asthma.
Not ‘difficult mother.’ Not ‘suspicious parent.’
Just: a person who cannot survive your ignorance.”
— A Mother Documenting Medical Fact as Legal Shield

---

This sharply articulated letter by Polly Chromatic, addressed to the Department of Social Development, is not merely a declaration of illness — it is a legally grounded plea for respect, space, and air.

It outlines her decades-long history with a life-threatening medical condition — severe eosinophilic asthma — and how local hostility, institutional ignorance, and social work overreach have placed her and her children at risk.

---

🧾 I. The Medical Facts Are Not Up for Debate

From the NHS (UK) and CDC (USA):

• Polly is clinically extremely vulnerable (high risk)

• She is on continuous oral steroids (prednisone)

• Shielding guidance includes:

  • No uninvited visitors

  • Avoidance of all triggers (disinfectants, perfumes, stress, smoke, etc.)

  • Calm environments essential for asthma control

---

⚠️ II. What the Department Has Done Instead

• Ignored shielding protocol

• Repeatedly allowed false child abuse allegations based on lifestyle accommodations (no smoking, no toxic products, etc.)

• Permitted harassment from neighbours who resist her boundaries

• Created stressful encounters with social workers and truancy officers during a global respiratory pandemic

• Continued to operate in a way that increases her risk of hospitalisation or death

---

🧠 III. Clarifying the Actual Issue

This is not about parenting.
This is not about truancy.
This is not about attitude.

This is about:

• Medical discrimination

• Public misunderstanding of asthma

• Systemic punishment of individuals who enforce their own health boundaries

• Abuse of statutory resources to pursue false claims while ignoring medical law

---

📌 Final Point:

“False allegations of child abuse are a crime.”

And so is ignoring a medically documented need for safety.
This letter doesn’t ask for sympathy.
It demands legal and ethical conduct — with the evidence attached.

---

I Went to Report Abuse — They Told Me I Was the Criminal

 📑 SWANK Dispatch: How to Mismanage a Complaint into a Threat

🗓️ 6 August 2020

Filed Under: complaint misdirection, truancy lies, homeschool sabotage, procedural dishonesty, trauma minimisation, asthma discrimination, policy weaponisation, investigative misconduct

---

“I brought evidence. They brought back the original threat — with new stationery.”
— A Mother Who Tried Every Proper Channel

On 6 August 2020, Polly Chromatic met with Willette A. Pratt, Senior Investigative Officer of the Complaints Commission, expecting an investigation into her trauma and systemic abuse by the Department of Social Development. What she received was an administrative boomerang: the original truancy threat from 2017 — revived, rebranded, and hurled back at her by the very commission meant to hear her complaint.

---

🔁 I. The Complaint Was About Trauma. The Response Was a Checklist.

She described the following:

• Her sons were sexually abused by a doctor under state orders.
• Her fence was dismantled.
• Her home was entered illegally during a pandemic.
• She was dragged to hospital under false accusations.

What did Willette Pratt say?

“Your children aren’t approved for homeschool, and they may be taken away.”

---

📋 II. The New Requirements — Delivered with a Smile

Pratt claimed Polly had spoken to the wrong official in 2017.
Apparently, Mark Garland, Deputy Director of Education, was not “senior enough.”
Despite having:
✓ Met with her
✓ Approved her curriculum
✓ Notified Social Development

Now, she was told to:

• Re-submit all documentation
• Include proof of social interaction
• Hire a teacher to assess her children annually
• Address it to Edgar Howell, Director
• Send it through Pratt (of course)

---

🧠 III. The Gaslight Was Institutional

“I feel like the entire issue is much bigger than just with the Department of Social Development.”

Indeed. The Complaints Commission had become another arm of the same dysfunction. Rather than investigating the abuse, it pivoted to treating the victim as the problem.

---

⚖️ Final Position:

“Because obtaining homeschool approval is so important for my children’s well-being… I feel it is necessary to consult an attorney.”

A mother filed a complaint to protect her children.
She left that meeting more endangered than when she arrived.

---