🦚 On Clarification, Conditional Timelines, and the Art of Pre-Rejection: A Letter from RBKC, Translated for the Archive
Filed under the documentation of polite deferral, procedural pause, and administratively sanctioned uncertainty.
13 February 2024
Our reference: 12136041
To: Polly
📜 Dear Polly,
Thank you for your recent complaint, received on 12 February 2024. We extend our thanks for bringing this matter to our attention — though not, it would seem, to a conclusion.
🧾 On Scope, Specificity, and Cross-Departmental Discomfort
We note that your concerns span multiple organisations, including but not limited to the NHS and Housing departments.
The implication being: breadth of concern is somehow a disqualifier of immediacy.
While we usually aim to respond to complaints within:
10 working days at Stage One, or
20 working days at Stage Two,
we must first pause to request clarity — namely:
What is your complaint specifically in relation to RBKC?
What outcome do you seek?
Only with this information, it seems, may the wheels of public service begin their elegant crawl.
📎 On Links, Deadlines, and Pre-Emptive Closure
Please provide the requested details no later than Friday 16 February 2024, by clicking the designated digital link.
Should silence greet our inbox, we shall interpret it —
not as illness, overwhelm, or bureaucratic exhaustion —
but as a voluntary withdrawal of your complaint.
If no response is received by close of business, your complaint will be formally rejected, with the process considered null and void —
a neat conclusion to an unresolved harm.
Please note: the clock has not yet started ticking.
Time, in this context, only begins when clarity meets form.
📜 Yours bureaucratically,
The Polite Arm of Procedural Suspension
RBKC Complaints Department