⟡ The Child Was Hypoxic. I Emailed Everyone. And They Escalated Anyway. ⟡
“We were trying to stabilise her oxygen. They were trying to stabilise a narrative.”
Filed: 21 November 2024
Reference: SWANK/WCC-NHS/EMAILS-08
📎 Download PDF – 2024-11-21_SWANK_EmailUpdate_WCC-NHS_HonorOxygenCrisis_DisabilityDisclosure.pdf
Written update to NHS and Westminster Children’s Services regarding Honor’s medical emergency, oxygen desaturation, and hospital referral — sent while the family was under active investigation.
I. What Happened
On 21 November 2024, the parent emailed both Westminster Children’s Services and NHS GP Dr Philip Reid to report that:
Her daughter, Heir, was suffering from critically low oxygen levels
At-home treatment with a nebuliser was raising oxygen only to 93%
They were attempting stabilisation at home to avoid traumatic A&E refusal
The GP confirmed that an immediate hospital visit was medically necessary
Records were attached; communication was written-only due to a respiratory disability
Despite the medical nature of the email, and the fact that safeguarding staff were directly copied, no support was offered— and procedural escalation continued as though the family had said nothing at all.
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That Westminster Children’s Services was aware of a serious respiratory emergency involving a child
That the parent coordinated medical response via her GP and shared the outcome with the safeguarding team
That this communication occurred in the middle of an active safeguarding plan — yet was treated with silence
That the parent again referenced her own disability and need for email-only communication
That the institutional response was not care — but tactical indifference
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when your child is experiencing oxygen levels below clinical thresholds and you still have to write the email yourself, it’s not a communication breakdown —
it’s evidence of neglect at the institutional level.
Because when safeguarding staff are informed of a hospital referral and say nothing,
that silence isn’t neutrality. It’s liability.
And because when a disabled parent sends medical records to the local authority — not as evidence, but as plea —
you don’t just escalate the file. You expose the institution.
IV. Violations
Children Act 1989 / 2004
Failure to respond to or record critical medical updates during an active child protection planHuman Rights Act 1998 – Article 8
Interference with family and private life under duress and disabilityEquality Act 2010 – Section 20
Ignored written-only communication request due to respiratory disabilityNHS Safeguarding Protocols & Duty of Coordination
Breach of collaborative responsibility between health and safeguarding professionals
V. SWANK’s Position
This wasn’t a family in crisis.
This was a family in treatment.
This wasn’t a safeguarding risk.
This was medical data sent under pressure.
And what did they do?
Nothing. Because any response would have made them accountable.
So now we make the record.
And they can try to catch up with the archive.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.