“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label constructive eviction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constructive eviction. Show all posts

He Promised Reimbursement. He Delivered a Crime Scene.


⟡ The Landlord Who Evicted Us with Sewer Gas ⟡

Filed: 19 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/HOUSING/AIRROCK-EJECTION
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-19_SWANK_Complaint_Landlord_EladKatz_AirRock_ConstructiveEviction_DisabilityHousingBreach.pdf

I. He Promised Reimbursement. He Delivered a Crime Scene.

This complaint against Elad Katz, operating under AirRock UK, sets out the legal and material basis for constructive eviction due to:

  • Prolonged sewer gas exposure at 37 Elgin Crescent

  • Failure to remediate hazardous conditions

  • Withholding of agreed reimbursements

  • Breach of disability accommodations, tenancy duty, and housing law

The flat became uninhabitable.
The air became dangerous.
And the landlord — became legally irrelevant.

II. What Was Promised. What Was Weaponised.

This was not a dispute over rent.
This was housing by chemical warfare.

The complaint evidences:

  • Internal confirmation of known gas leaks

  • Negligence in coordinating repair or relocation

  • Evasion of legal liability disguised as polite delay

  • A landlord more responsive to image than asthma

He didn’t issue an eviction notice.
He used the plumbing.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because “constructive eviction” isn’t metaphor — it’s legal precision.
Because the landlord’s inaction constituted forced departure through toxicity.
Because disability law is not paused when a pipe bursts.

Let the record show:

  • The tenancy was sabotaged

  • The promises were performative

  • The harm was chemical

  • And SWANK — filed the eviction he pretended not to issue

This isn’t about poor maintenance.
It’s about calculated silence that cleared a flat without paperwork.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not permit landlords to escape liability through attrition.
We do not consider gas leaks a form of negotiation.
We do not redact the name of the man who let children inhale sulphide to avoid relocation costs.

Let the record show:

The air was lethal.
The flat was unlivable.
The contract was breached.
And SWANK — filed it all, for housing court and public record.

This is not tenant grievance.
It is disability eviction by sewer line — and we archived every molecule.




No comments:

They Took Over a Toxic Tenancy. Then They Pretended Not to Notice.


⟡ The Estate Agent Who Took the Keys and Left the Gas On ⟡

Filed: 5 May 2025
Annex to N1 Claim: Elgin Crescent – £4,500 Damages
📎 Download PDF — 2025-05-05_SWANK_N1Annex_Chestertons_AgentNegligence_ElginCrescent_SewerGasConstructiveEviction.pdf

I. “Not Our Fault” Was Filed Too Late

This annex was submitted as part of the civil proceedings documenting:

  • Known environmental hazard at 37 Elgin Crescent

  • Medical collapse of tenants (including children)

  • Formal documentation served to Chestertons

  • No protective action taken — despite assuming legal management duties

They accepted the contract.
They declined the responsibility.
Now they’re named — in court.

II. What the Agents Knew. What They Didn’t Do.

Chestertons was informed of:

  • Hydrogen sulphide gas presence

  • Tenant vulnerability due to documented disability

  • Need for emergency accommodation

  • Regulatory filings already submitted (HSE, RBKC)

Their reaction:

  • No contact

  • No mitigation

  • No response

  • No lawful excuse

This wasn’t a miscommunication.
It was estate-agency-level collusion by omission.

III. Why SWANK Filed It

Because estate agents who take over toxic tenancies do not inherit immunity — they inherit accountability.
Because when four children are involved and the air is medically hostile, “We’re just the agents” is not a defence — it’s an admission of proximity to harm.

Let the record show:

  • The hazard was inherited

  • The tenancy was neglected

  • The injury was real

  • And SWANK — filed the annex with £4,500 in damages attached

This isn’t slander.
It’s procedural memory, filed before the judge.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not allow rebranded management to excuse legacy endangerment.
We do not accept silence in the face of housing law breaches.
We do not redact agents who took over a crime scene and continued the performance.

Let the record show:

The hazard stayed.
The family left.
The agent did nothing.
And SWANK — annexed their name to the civil claim.

This isn’t property management.
It’s gas-lit abandonment — now legally embossed.





No comments:

Documented Obsessions