“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label Weaponised Procedure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weaponised Procedure. Show all posts

Anatomy of Institutional Malice: A Forensic Record of Procedural Retaliation

 

🦯 Retaliation & Procedural Escalation Timeline

A Stylised Chronology of Disability Discrimination, Retaliatory Safeguarding, and State-Endorsed Harassment

By: Polly Chromatic

This is not a record of mere bureaucratic malfunction. It is a silk-gloved indictment. A forensic reconstruction of how public authorities — emboldened by their own impunity — sought to punish a disabled woman for insisting on written standards.

Westminster Children’s Services. RBKC. The NHS.
Each implicated. Each archived.

Every entry below is backed by police reports, clinical documentation, legal submissions, and the imperturbable clarity of written truth.

What follows is a timeline — not of time, but of intent.

🕰 June – October 2023 — Toxic Foundations

  • Sewer gas poisoning in the Claimant’s flat, documented yet dismissed. Environmental Health (RBKC) ignored repeated warnings. Not a single urgent inspection until February 2024 — eight months too late.

  • October 2023: Forced hotel relocation — mother and four children — at their own expense. Landlord refused repairs, sold the flat from under them.

  • While in hotel: Personal belongings stolen. Not one authority intervened.

🕰 November 2023 — Medical Distress, Misread

  • First emergency visit to St Thomas’ Hospital: respiratory collapse. No toxicology. No urgency. A clinical shrug.

🕰 December 2023 — The Cat Dies First

  • The family cat dies in the poisoned flat. Still, no environmental response from RBKC. The death was logged — as were their silences.

🕰 January 2024 — Second Hospital Visit

  • Second A&E admission: identical symptoms, identical neglect. Instead of investigating toxins, the NHS escalates to social services.

🕰 Nov 2023 – Feb 2025 — A&E Asylum

  • Multiple emergency visits for the Claimant and her children — all stemming from sewer gas exposure and infections made worse by the trauma of social work intrusion. Not a home. Not a system. A trigger loop in policy drag.

🕰 February 2024 — The Fabrication Begins

  • Physical assault attempt at Virgin Active Gym (Notting Hill): A Black male customer attempted to punch the Claimant in the face. Rather than protect the victim, Virgin Active banned the Claimant. A police report was filed. No action was taken.

  • Safeguarding referrals from St Thomas’ and Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals: red eyes interpreted as "possible intoxication."

  • No tests. No consent.

  • Environmental data provided. Ignored. The result: escalation by fiction.

  • RBKC Child Protection Plan imposed because the Claimant could not speak.

  • Eosinophilic asthma, PTSD, and muscle tension dysphonia — all documented, all dismissed.

🕰 October 2024 — Paper Downgrade, Not Relief

  • Downgraded to Child in Need, not because the harm ended, but because the panic attacks began. The abuse of process merely changed outfits.

🗓 15 February 2025 — First Police Strike

  • Report BCA-10622-25-0101-IR filed against Kirsty Hornal:
    ✓ Coercion
    ✓ Discrimination
    ✓ Adjustment refusal

🗓 7 March 2025 — The Claim Hits Court

  • N1 Civil Claim filed. The accusations:
    ✓ Harassment
    ✓ Disability Discrimination
    ✓ Weaponised safeguarding

🗓 14 April 2025 — Retaliation Rehearsed

  • Westminster issues PLO letter. No new evidence. No new assessment. Pure retaliation — days after legal filings.

🗓 15 April 2025 — Police Again

  • Report BCA-25130-25-0101-IR filed:
    ✓ Escalation
    ✓ Harassment
    ✓ Breach of adjustments

🗓 16 April 2025 — Repeat Offender: Hornal

  • Report BCA-25249-25-0101-IR:
    ✓ Coercive control
    ✓ Data misuse
    ✓ Health endangerment

🗓 18 April 2025 — Flag Raised

  • Formal notification to safeguarding and legal bodies. Pattern cited. Silence returned.

🗓 21 April 2025 — The Medical Response

  • Asthma clarified. Written-only needs reaffirmed. Misrepresentation denounced.

🗓 22 April 2025 — Legal Line Drawn

  • Written-only demand formalised. Equality Act cited.

🗓 24 April 2025 — Evidence Supplied (Again)

  • PLO agenda. Medicals. Legal. Delivered.

🗓 17 May 2025 — Dual Filing Day

  • N16A Injunction

  • N461 Judicial Review

  • The fight, formalised.

🗓 21 May 2025 — Encrypted Retaliation

  • Police Report ROC-10237-25-0101-IR:
    ✓ Sam Brown
    ✓ Unlawful contact
    ✓ Adjustment breach

🗓 22 May 2025 — Final Refusal

  • Final written response. CIN visit declined. Accompanied by:
    ✓ Police reports
    ✓ Psychiatric reports
    ✓ Legal claims

  • All future contact (non-written) to be treated as unlawful harassment.

🗓 29 May 2025 — The Letter of Intent

  • Kirsty Hornal’s final act of theatre:

    • 11:14am — Email threat

    • 11:41am — Follow-up urging legal advice

  • Documents included:
    ✓ Solicitor list
    ✓ Duplicate PLO
    ✓ So-called "Letter of Intent"

“Please do take the letter of intent to a solicitor for advice.”
A line more befitting a bailiff than a children's service.

📟 Conclusion

This is not a “safeguarding concern.” It is a documented campaign of retaliatory escalation, carried out beneath the pastel pretence of procedure.

No risk. No injury. No protection.
Only a refusal — to let a disabled mother live, speak, and raise her children without interference.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

No comments:

Documented Obsessions