Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.): asthma abuse

Showing posts with label asthma abuse. Show all posts

Chromatic v. Shopna [2025] – On the Illegality of “You Can’t Eat Because You’re 10”

🪞SWANK Evidentiary Catalogue

Filed 5 August 2025

Reference: 2025-08-07_SWANK_Letter_WestminsterFosterer_ShopnaSafeguardingProsecution.pdf
PDF Title: Shopna LOI Official.pdf
1-Line Summary:
A foster carer assigned by Westminster allegedly told a child with asthma he “couldn’t eat because he’s 10.” We responded with a criminal summons.

I. What Happened

Between June and August 2025, a foster carer known only as Shopna, working under contract with Westminster Children’s Services, allegedly subjected multiple American-born children to degrading restrictions, verbal abuse, and disability-based neglect.

Reported violations include:
– Denying a 10-year-old asthmatic child food “because he’s 10”
– Prohibiting children from taking water bottles or drawing materials upstairs
– Mocking U.S. nationality: “You’re from America” (said with derision)
– Emotional suppression through device bans, surveillance, and infantilisation

These abuses were documented in a handwritten journal by Romeo Bonneannee, age 16, and reported to the Metropolitan Police on 2 August 2025 (Ref: TAA-38017-25-0101-IR). The children’s mother, Polly Chromatic, submitted this evidence alongside a formal Laying of Information for a criminal summons.

II. What the Complaint Establishes

This is not simply poor parenting. This is state-sponsored neglect carried out by a foster carer funded by the Local Authority. The formal LOI submitted to Westminster Magistrates’ Court includes the following charges:

Child Cruelty – s.1 Children and Young Persons Act 1933
Disability Neglect – s.15 Equality Act 2010
Neglect of Medically Vulnerable Child
Harassment and Coercive Control – s.76 Serious Crime Act 2015
Suppression of Safeguarding Disclosures – Articles 8 & 12 ECHR
Racially Aggravated Harassment – s.31 Crime and Disorder Act 1998

This isn’t a hypothetical claim. It’s backed by:
– Police filings
– Journal evidence
– Medical documents confirming eosinophilic asthma in all four children
– Reports submitted to the Central Family Court, U.S. Embassy, Social Work England, and international human rights monitors

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because we do not “manage behaviour” by depriving chronically ill children of water and food.
Because “you’re from America” is not an excuse to humiliate or marginalise a child.
Because cruelty disguised as routine must be confronted with law, not leniency.

And because no matter how obscure your surname, if you harm children under Westminster’s protection, we will find your name in court.

IV. Violations

Domestic Law Breaches:
– Children and Young Persons Act 1933
– Equality Act 2010
– Serious Crime Act 2015
– Crime and Disorder Act 1998
– Children Act 1989

Human Rights:
– ECHR Article 3 (Freedom from degrading treatment)
– ECHR Article 8 (Family life and dignity)
– UNCRC Article 12 (Right to be heard)

Safeguarding Framework Violations:
– Foster Placement Oversight
– Disability Accommodations
– Communication Rights

V. SWANK’s Position

We filed this LOI on 7 August 2025 in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court and simultaneously added it to Case No: ZC25C50281 at the Central Family Court.

We will not accept private apologies.
We do not seek corrective training.
We seek criminal prosecution.

Because if a 10-year-old with asthma is told he can’t eat, we will file until justice does.

⚖️ Legal Rights & Archival Footer This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. This document does not contain confidential family court material. It contains the lawful submissions, filings, and lived experiences of a party to multiple legal proceedings — including civil claims, safeguarding audits, and formal complaints. All references to professionals are strictly in their public roles and relate to conduct already raised in litigation. This is not a breach of privacy. It is the preservation of truth. Protected under Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 12 of the Human Rights Act, and all applicable rights to freedom of expression, legal self-representation, and public interest disclosure. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. It is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt. Preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance, retaliation deserves an archive, and writing is how I survive this pain. Attempts to silence or intimidate this author will be documented and filed in accordance with SWANK protocols. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

𝒀𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕 𝒖𝒔, 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒖𝒔.

🖋 𝒮𝒲𝒜𝒩𝒦 Dispatch | 21 November 2024

We Do Not Argue. We Archive.

Filed Under: Bullying in A&E, NHS Defensiveness, Verbal Refusal, Respiratory Abuse, SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty (et al.),

“I do not waste my time arguing with people.”

This is not silence.
This is strategy.

“They either want to help or they don’t. It’s that simple.”

And when they don’t? I do what sovereign archivists do best—
I document.

I file. I publish. I dismantle.

Because when you argue with a breathless mother,
you reveal who you serve—and it isn’t care.

“I cannot speak verbally to argue or explain things period.”

Let me translate:
I am not the problem.
Your communication expectations are.

“The hospital bullies me and my children every time we have a respiratory issue…”

And still you dare call it support.
No. It is clinical coercion by disbelief.

“Talking exacerbates my asthma.”
“My asthma is worse now because of that ignorant doctor.”

And this is why I speak only through the written record.
Typed. Filed. Forwarded.

You refused treatment.
I responded with documented clarity.

You denied belief.
I delivered archival consequence.

—

📍 Typed Between Attacks. Filed Without Permission.
𝒫𝑜𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸, Non-Verbal Strategist, Director of Breath-Controlled Resistance

—

Labels: A&E bullying, asthma abuse, hospital neglect, NHS misconduct, verbal refusal, archival retaliation, SWANK maternal strategy

—

Search Description:
Mother refuses verbal conflict with NHS. Hospital accused of bullying and neglect. Asthma worsened by doctor. Future conflicts to be archived, not argued.

The Abuse Cycle: Explained by the One Forced to Breathe Through It

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
“My Lungs Are Not a Policy Debate”

Filed Under: Asthma Ignorance · Verbal Violence · Medical Misrecognition · NHS Gatekeeping · Disability Advocacy · SWANK London Ltd

—

Dear Kirsty,

You received the email.
You read the subject line: “The abuse cycle.”
And still — you requested a meeting. A call.
A verbal medium, knowing full well that my voice is a medical casualty.

“Everyone tries to force me to explain things verbally…
and they also get angry if I try to communicate via email.”

This is not miscommunication.
This is discipline by design.
A coercive loop: pressure the disabled to perform, then punish them for failing to comply.

“When I get sick… the hospital is so ignorant about asthma that they refuse us treatment.”

You provoke the flare.
You deny the care.
You demand verbal grace from a throat clamped by protocol.

So here’s the official workaround — since you thrive on officialdom:

A disability advocate to attend, not perform.
A GP-issued directive stating what I’ve said a hundred times: Verbal harms me.
A verbal ban in all clinical engagements. Not a preference — a protection.

This isn’t a request.
This is a legal wall dressed in velvet syntax.

And yes: your refusal will be archived.
Your escalation will be indexed.
Your silence will be printed.

—

📍 Exhaled Calmly by:
Polly Chromatic
Archival Asthmatic · Sovereign Communicator of Breach Logic
✉ director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
© SWANK London Ltd. All Loops Broken.

Recently Tried in the Court of Public Opinion