⟡ We Filed It to Trump ⟡
Because if the British state won’t back down, maybe someone in Manhattan will.
Filed: 20 June 2025
Reference: SWANK/USA/TRUMP-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-06-20_SWANK_Letter_Trump_CrossBorderRetaliation.pdf
A formal letter from a disabled U.S. mother seeking American intervention after the UK targeted her and her four children for documenting institutional misconduct.
I. What Happened
A mother of four disabled U.S. citizen children began publishing an evidentiary archive from London.
The British state didn’t investigate. It retaliated.
Safeguarding was weaponised. Medical accommodations were denied. Packages were shoved through her door in veiled coercion.
And when she refused to answer — they kept escalating.
So she wrote to Donald J. Trump.
II. What the Letter Establishes
That a disabled American citizen is being stalked and harassed by British authorities for publishing lawful records
That safeguarding protocols have been used not for protection — but for suppression
That four disabled American children have been targeted solely to silence their mother
That these actions violate international disability law and parental rights
That the U.S. government is now formally asked to intervene — and cannot claim ignorance
III. Why SWANK Filed It
Because what is happening is not procedural. It’s punitive.
Because retaliation under the guise of child protection is not just unethical — it’s legally unsustainable.
Because when the U.K. won’t investigate itself, escalation becomes a matter of diplomacy.
And because “international relations” do not override maternal instinct, medical exemption, or the U.S. Constitution.
IV. Violations Identified
Institutional Retaliation for Lawful Expression
Systematic Disability Discrimination (Parent and Children)
Misuse of Safeguarding for Procedural Coercion
Cross-Border Civil Rights Breach
V. SWANK’s Position
This isn’t a letter of complaint. It’s a declaration of jurisdiction.
Filed with timestamp, reference code, and evidentiary archive.
If the U.K. continues its harassment, it will do so knowing the American public — and its leadership — have been formally informed.
There are five U.S. citizens at risk.
And now there are zero excuses.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡ Every entry is timestamped. Every sentence is jurisdictional. Every structure is protected. To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach. We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence. This is not a blog. This is a legal-aesthetic instrument. Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation. Because evidence deserves elegance. And retaliation deserves an archive. © 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved. Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.