“Please Stop Pretending My Children Are Truant When You’ve Read None of the Emails”
⟡ A Formal Complaint to the Complaints Commission on the Abuse, Trespass, and Fictional Truancy Allegations of TCI Social Development
IN THE MATTER OF: Illegal safeguarding, contradictory state instructions, fabricated truancy threats, and the absurdity of being harassed for following directions
⟡ METADATA
Filed: 6 August 2020
Reference Code: SWANK-TCI-COMPLAINTS-TRUANCYTHREAT
Court File Name: 2020-08-06_Court_Letter_TCI_ComplaintsCommission_SocialDevComplaint_TruancyThreat
Summary: This complaint letter was sent following a face-to-face meeting with Willette A. Pratt (Senior Investigative Officer) to formally document a series of illegal actions and procedural contradictions by the Turks and Caicos Islands Department of Social Development. The letter outlines sexualised medical abuse, illegal home entries, false vaccination claims, and a fabricated truancy threat — all rooted in the state’s inability to remember its own policy or communicate within departments. The tone is resolutely civil, even as the content burns through institutional credibility like acid.
I. What Happened
In May 2017, social workers and police forced Polly Chromatic and her children into a hospital where her sons were sexually assaulted by a doctor in front of nine adults, including herself and her mother — with no lawful basis or privacy
In August 2020, police and social workers again entered her property — this time by dismantling her fence — and forcibly removed the family for interrogation without cause or paperwork
In the same month, another forced hospital visit occurred over fabricated non-vaccination concerns, again disproven by medical staff
In March 2020, staff entered the property during COVID-19 lockdown, without consent, PPE, or legal justification
At every stage, the Department of Social Development failed to provide any investigative reports, despite legal obligation
Despite a homeschooling arrangement approved by Mark Garland in 2017, Polly was accused of truancy by the Complaints Commission — because, as it turns out, she “spoke to the wrong person”
II. What the Complaint Establishes
That Polly followed every instruction from officials — and was punished for it
That Mark Garland, the Deputy Director, provided the homeschool approval and policy in 2017 — which she followed to the letter
That the Department of Education never made direct contact or provided updated procedures
That Willette Pratt herself implied Polly’s children could be removed unless she complied with new (undisclosed) procedures
That abuse and trespass were regular, unacknowledged occurrences, presented as if they were routine
That institutional memory is nonexistent, but institutional overreach is flourishing
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because when your children are assaulted in a hospital and then accused of truancy three years later, something has gone catastrophically wrong. Because safeguarding doesn’t mean fabricated drama followed by radio silence. Because this mother followed the law — and the state simply forgot what it told her. Because a “policy” that cannot be named or provided is not a policy — it’s institutional gaslighting.
IV. Violations
Sexual abuse of minors under clinical pretext
Trespass and unlawful removal
Violation of Children Ordinance 2015: failure to provide investigative reports
COVID-19 Emergency Law violations
Misuse of truancy enforcement to harass a law-abiding mother
Procedural deflection by social development, education, and complaints staff
Violation of right to education and protection from arbitrary state interference
V. SWANK’s Position
We log this letter as an unflinching statement of lawful resistance. SWANK London Ltd. affirms:
That a parent who follows departmental policy should not be threatened with child removal
That speaking to a deputy director is not “the wrong person” — it’s a chain of command
That safeguarding authorities cannot operate on memory, mood, and untraceable policy
That asking for the actual written procedure you’re accused of breaching is not subversive — it’s survival
That institutional confusion is not an excuse — it’s a liability