“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Showing posts with label email-based communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label email-based communication. Show all posts

I Prefer Telepathy, But Email Will Suffice.



🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 14 December 2024
I DON’T EMAIL FOR FUN. I EMAIL BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO READ.
Also Titled: “I Prefer Telepathy, But Email Will Suffice.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Ignored Emails · Lawyer Apathy · Accessibility Failure · Verbal Disability · Repetitive Dismissal · Institutional Ghosting · Folder Abuse · SWANK Telepathic Litigation Ledger


📣 IN CASE YOU “MISSED IT” AGAIN (AND AGAIN):

“I’ve been emailing you all asking for advice about the problem for a whole year and have received zero advice.”
“My lawyers told me to contact them for advice but put my emails in a separate folder so I can’t reach them.”
“Why would you just ignore my emails and assume they are meaningless?”
“My ability to talk is getting worse because no one will read my emails.”
“If you don’t understand the problem, you can’t help me.”

You didn’t lose the message.
You categorised it into oblivion.


🧠 ACCESS STATEMENT (WHICH YOU PREFER TO GHOST):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult.
I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

This is a medical necessity.
Not a lifestyle choice. Not a whim.
And certainly not a reason to route me into “Folder: Do Not Open.”


📎 TRANSLATED FOR THE NON-TELEPATHIC:

  • Email is not excessive.

  • Silence is not defiance.

  • Non-verbal communication is not non-compliance.

  • And “no response” is not an ethical stance. It’s cowardice.


🛑 LITIGATION-READY CLOSURE:

I write because speech harms me.
I persist because you disappeared.
If you do not comprehend this by now, it's not due to complexity.
It’s due to contempt.


Polly Chromatic
Written. Archived. Ignored only by those who fear documentation.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com



Documented Obsessions