⟡ SWANK ENTRY — HEIR POLICE REPORT ⟡
Filed: 06 October 2025
Reference: SWANK/WESTMINSTER/CRIMINAL-ABUSE
Download PDF: 2025-10-06_SWANK_Report_HeirBurnIncident.pdf
Summary: Formal police report documenting a physical injury (curling iron burn) sustained by eight-year-old Heir while in foster care under Westminster supervision.
I. What Happened
On 5 October 2025, during a supervised contact at Green Mayes Contact Centre (Ilford), Heir — aged eight, American citizen, and child of the Applicant — disclosed that someone deliberately burned her hand with a curling iron.
The injury was visibly open, untreated, and consistent with a thermal burn.
Her mother, Polly Chromatic, photographed the wound and immediately filed an online Metropolitan Police Report(Ref: TAA-50108-25-0101-IR) at 20:01 on 6 October 2025.
The report identifies:
• Victim: Heir (8, female, Mixed White–Black Caribbean heritage, severe eosinophilic asthma)
• Reporter: Polly Chromatic, mother, Director of SWANK London Ltd.
• Incident Location: 79 Duke Road, Ilford IG6 1NL
• Nature of Offence: Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (thermal burn)
• Perpetrator: Unknown (suspected foster carer or household member)
II. What the Document Establishes
• A recorded physical injury inflicted upon a disabled child under Local Authority care.
• Formal acknowledgment by the Metropolitan Police Service that the injury was severe enough to warrant a criminal report.
• Evidence of medical neglect — untreated wound visible at time of contact.
• Confirmation of racial and national-origin hostility cited as contributing factors.
• Corroboration that the incident took place while the child was under Westminster’s delegated safeguarding duty.
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because Westminster Children’s Services continue to frame their safeguarding interventions as protective, when in reality their placements have produced physical harm, untreated injury, and the visible distress of a U.S. citizen child.
Because Heir’s pain was met with procedural silence.
Because institutional custody without accountability is not protection — it is custody with injury.
IV. Violations
• Children Act 1989, s.22(3) – failure to safeguard and promote welfare while in care.
• Human Rights Act 1998, Art. 3 – inhuman or degrading treatment.
• ECHR, Art. 8 – violation of family life through unsafe foster placement.
• UNCRC, Art. 19 – failure to protect child from all forms of physical violence.
• Equality Act 2010, ss. 6 & 20 – neglect of disability-related welfare needs (asthma).
V. SWANK’s Position
This incident is not an isolated act of carelessness but part of a pattern of neglect masked as oversight.
The Local Authority’s continued control over medical access, supervision, and reporting constitutes a structural abuse of safeguarding powers.
SWANK London Ltd. considers the burn on Heir’s hand to be prima facie evidence of criminal negligence under delegated care, warranting immediate suspension of the current placement, police investigation, and a full welfare reassessment.
Filed under the jurisdiction of the Mirror Court — SWANK London Ltd.
A House of Velvet Contempt and Evidentiary Precision.
🪞 We file what others forget.