⟡ “I Filed My Lawsuit. They Ignored My Lungs.” ⟡
Polly Chromatic Informs Kirsty Hornal, NHS, Legal Counsel, and RBKC of N1 Claim Filing — Links Ongoing Respiratory Harm to Social Work Conduct
Filed: 24 February 2025
Reference: SWANK/WCC/EMAIL-10
📎 Download PDF – 2025-02-24_SWANK_Email_KirstyHornal_N1ClaimFiling_DisabilityImpactStatement.pdf
Summary: Email from Polly Chromatic announcing formal N1 lawsuit filing. Sent to Kirsty Hornal, NHS, and legal teams. Cites exacerbated vocal cord injury and asthma from Hornal’s previous visit.
I. What Happened
On 24 February 2025, Polly Chromatic sent a group email to:
Kirsty Hornal (Westminster)
Laura Savage (Merali Beedle)
Simon O’Meara (Blackfords)
Gideon Mpalanyi (RBKC)
Philip Reid (NHS)
She stated:
“I’m submitting my lawsuit today. Have a nice week.”
“My vocal cords are still extremely exacerbated from Kirsty’s last visit... I can barely talk and also can’t breathe well.”
She attached the N1 Claim Form, making this a formal timestamped filing announcement.
The email was also forwarded to Harley Street Mental Health, requesting delivery to Dr. Rafiq — confirming clinical documentation of harm.
II. What the Record Establishes
• The N1 claim was served and timestamped to all relevant actors on 24 Feb 2025
• A direct health impact (vocal cord damage, asthma exacerbation) from Kirsty’s presence was documented
• This forms part of the disability timeline and adjustment refusal narrative
• NHS staff were made aware that social work visits were causing harm
• No responsive duty of care was triggered — reinforcing deliberate inaction
III. Why SWANK Logged It
Because lawsuits don’t begin with papers — they begin with harm.
Because emailing “I can’t breathe” isn’t a metaphor when it follows safeguarding escalation.
Because the harm and the legal filing were in the same sentence — and the system still refused to adjust.
SWANK logs every filing that came with a body count.
IV. SWANK’s Position
We do not accept that social work visits can physically injure disabled claimants.
We do not accept that such injuries are irrelevant when disclosed alongside legal action.
We do not accept that this message was unclear.
This wasn’t a declaration of intent. It was a declaration of injury — and SWANK preserved it.
⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡
Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.
To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.
This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.
Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.
© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.